JoyMax banning
- marijnz0r
- Active Member
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:17 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Netherlands
JoyMax banning
Bot punishment list:
1st: 572 accounts
2nd: 145 accounts
3rd: 26 accounts
It looks to me like they are actually doing something...
Let's hope they will keep on going and even more punishments on daily base!
1st: 572 accounts
2nd: 145 accounts
3rd: 26 accounts
It looks to me like they are actually doing something...
Let's hope they will keep on going and even more punishments on daily base!
- pr0klobster
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1427
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:28 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Olympus
Re: JoyMax banning
Seen it before, I won't hold my breath that they will continue.
If faith is a crutch, I'm not limping anymore.
Re: JoyMax banning
Is there any proofs that those guys are actually banned?
In kSro they said they banned bots and then unbanned at the end of the day -.-"
In kSro they said they banned bots and then unbanned at the end of the day -.-"
- CeLL
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4441
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: JoyMax banning
is there any proof they still play or are effected by this ban?

^^Thanks Thomas42
- Gladiator_RN
- SRF Herald
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:12 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: JoyMax banning
Joymax is never gonna ban the silk buying bots, believe me. Not permanently. They might try to ban all these gold bots but they will come back anyway.
- fckerr
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:02 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Bulgaria
Re: JoyMax banning
Fake or real bans,there isnt any result in server traffic. 
- Strwarrior
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:41 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: ....
Re: JoyMax banning
ofy1993 wrote:"Those who cannot learn from history are bound to repeat it."
Don't get your hopes up. Use the search button.
Honestly, no kidding, read the history in Srf. You will learn a lot from it about how Joymax "bans" bots.
+1, i still remember these days when we was saying "omg 80k bots banned", now they are 500...
there is no difference, those who got banned are those stupids who use wrong opcodes.

HUUU MADE THIS SIG?? Amarisa
- aishsharma
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1301
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:58 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: SilkroadSalvation
- Contact:
Re: JoyMax banning
the 572 ppl probbly had chars like: "asghasd" or "asjkdghads" and ofcourse "zjhgkvhasd"
but i bet that sdhgsd, sdufygsdf and sdligcv will take their place 5 minutes after the client is up agn...or if its up already
but i bet that sdhgsd, sdufygsdf and sdligcv will take their place 5 minutes after the client is up agn...or if its up already
Spoiler!
Theseus - lvl 5x - warrior/rogue
- curvekiller
- Active Member
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Bavaria
- Contact:
Re: JoyMax banning
CeLL wrote:is there any proof they still play or are affected by this ban?
Uh, uh, uh, spelling error.
OnTopic: This is nothing. Just another random detection by their fail automatic system.
We had a good ban once, 25000 first ban, but that was gone after a week, too, so
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*
Guild Wars 2
Still checking SRF for the community.
- CeLL
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4441
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: JoyMax banning
curvekiller wrote:CeLL wrote:is there any proof they still play or are affected by this ban?
Uh, uh, uh, spelling error.
OnTopic: This is nothing. Just another random detection by their fail automatic system.
We had a good ban once, 25000 first ban, but that was gone after a week, too, so![]()
![]()
Affect
1. influence somebody or something
to act upon or have an effect on somebody or something
so i gues i should have said
"is there any proof they still play or that this will have an effect on them."
not so much spelling as grammar.
Last edited by CeLL on Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

^^Thanks Thomas42
- Strwarrior
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:41 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: ....
Re: JoyMax banning
aishsharma wrote:the 572 ppl probbly had chars like: "asghasd" or "asjkdghads" and ofcourse "zjhgkvhasd"
but i bet that sdhgsd, sdufygsdf and sdligcv will take their place 5 minutes after the client is up agn...or if its up already
lol

HUUU MADE THIS SIG?? Amarisa
- curvekiller
- Active Member
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Bavaria
- Contact:
Re: JoyMax banning
CeLL wrote:curvekiller wrote:CeLL wrote:is there any proof they still play or are affected by this ban?
Uh, uh, uh, spelling error.
OnTopic: This is nothing. Just another random detection by their fail automatic system.
We had a good ban once, 25000 first ban, but that was gone after a week, too, so![]()
![]()
Affect
1. influence somebody or something
to act upon or have an effect on somebody or something
so i gues i should have said
"is there any proof they still play or that this will have an effect on them."
not so much spelling as grammar.
Yes, you can say "Is there any proof they still lay or that this will affect them?", too.
Btw, i'm from Germany
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*
Guild Wars 2
Still checking SRF for the community.
- CeLL
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4441
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: JoyMax banning
Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.

^^Thanks Thomas42
- .AWAKE.
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2070
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:06 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Rome
Re: JoyMax banning
CeLL wrote:Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.
my thoughts exactly..

- majincooler
- Active Member
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:17 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Odin
Re: JoyMax banning
.AWAKE. wrote:CeLL wrote:Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.
my thoughts exactly..
There isn't a community anymore. Don't you see it's the same 10-15 users posting in almost all the topics? Silkroad is dead, hence these forums are dead. If MOD can show us statistics about how many posts, topics, registered users per day go through Silkroad-related sections, I m pretty sure you ll be convinced, or atleast know that its nowhere near how it was before.
- .AWAKE.
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2070
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:06 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Rome
Re: JoyMax banning
that totally justifies the MODS bashing the only remaining community they have left on there forums..

- majincooler
- Active Member
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:17 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Odin
Re: JoyMax banning
.AWAKE. wrote:that totally justifies the MODS bashing the only remaining community they have left on there forums..
I am not creating a justification. I m just highlighting the part where CeLL said the entire community, he made it sound like as if we were hundreds of active posters in an interactive community.
- dom
- Global Moderator

- Posts: 9962
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:46 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: västkustskt
Re: JoyMax banning
Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
+1

- curvekiller
- Active Member
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Bavaria
- Contact:
Re: JoyMax banning
dom wrote:Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
+1
omagawd, all the mods hate us

cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*
Guild Wars 2
Still checking SRF for the community.
- CeLL
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4441
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: JoyMax banning
majincooler wrote:.AWAKE. wrote:that totally justifies the MODS bashing the only remaining community they have left on there forums..
I am not creating a justification. I m just highlighting the part where CeLL said the entire community, he made it sound like as if we were hundreds of active posters in an interactive community.
i didnt make it look like anyhthing, that is simply how you precieved it. it doesnt matter if it were 5 people, its still a little rude.
and @ AWAKE they have otl dont forget.

^^Thanks Thomas42
- dom
- Global Moderator

- Posts: 9962
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:46 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: västkustskt
Re: JoyMax banning
curvekiller wrote:dom wrote:Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
+1
omagawd, all the mods hate us![]()
![]()
http://pan-am.uniserve.com/pg000005.htm

- curvekiller
- Active Member
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Bavaria
- Contact:
Re: JoyMax banning

Still want to kill me?
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*
Guild Wars 2
Still checking SRF for the community.
- curvekiller
- Active Member
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Bavaria
- Contact:
Re: JoyMax banning

Edit: My pet died 1 year ago, too
Last edited by curvekiller on Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*
Guild Wars 2
Still checking SRF for the community.
- Swindler
- Forum God
- Posts: 11256
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:49 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Pimpas Paradise.
Re: JoyMax banning
Is this like selfmade pictures? They're not funny 
Re: JoyMax banning
HejsaN wrote:Is this like selfmade pictures? They're not funny
hmm...maybe we should go back to topic itself indeed...
Moar bunnys!
Re: JoyMax banning
CeLL wrote:Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.
np, anytime broski.
Maddening


- PR0METHEUS
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:30 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: JoyMax banning
CeLL wrote:is there any proof they still play or are effected by this ban?
+1. I'll start believing it more when active leaders of big botting guilds are banned permanently. I'll really know something GREAT is happening when entire botting guilds, or even 2/3rds, are banned from a server.
Missing the good times in SRO... 
SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)



