JoyMax banning

A place for general discussion about Silkroad Online. Talk about the game or ask questions. Please keep threads Silkroad Online related.
User avatar
marijnz0r
Active Member
Posts: 824
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:17 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Netherlands

JoyMax banning

Post by marijnz0r »

Bot punishment list:

1st: 572 accounts
2nd: 145 accounts
3rd: 26 accounts

It looks to me like they are actually doing something...
Let's hope they will keep on going and even more punishments on daily base!

User avatar
pr0klobster
Frequent Member
Posts: 1427
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:28 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Olympus

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by pr0klobster »

Seen it before, I won't hold my breath that they will continue.
If faith is a crutch, I'm not limping anymore.

User avatar
TheKnight
Veteran Member
Posts: 3067
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 5:11 pm
Location: leagueoflegends

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by TheKnight »

Is there any proofs that those guys are actually banned?
In kSro they said they banned bots and then unbanned at the end of the day -.-"
Image

Image
League of Legends EUW - Summoner Name: Th3Knight

User avatar
CeLL
Senior Member
Posts: 4441
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by CeLL »

is there any proof they still play or are effected by this ban?
Image
^^Thanks Thomas42

User avatar
Gladiator_RN
SRF Herald
Posts: 2385
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:12 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by Gladiator_RN »

Joymax is never gonna ban the silk buying bots, believe me. Not permanently. They might try to ban all these gold bots but they will come back anyway.

User avatar
fckerr
Loyal Member
Posts: 1914
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:02 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Bulgaria

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by fckerr »

Fake or real bans,there isnt any result in server traffic. :banghead:

User avatar
Strwarrior
Veteran Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:41 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: ....

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by Strwarrior »

ofy1993 wrote:"Those who cannot learn from history are bound to repeat it."

Don't get your hopes up. Use the search button.

Honestly, no kidding, read the history in Srf. You will learn a lot from it about how Joymax "bans" bots.

+1, i still remember these days when we was saying "omg 80k bots banned", now they are 500...

there is no difference, those who got banned are those stupids who use wrong opcodes.
Image

HUUU MADE THIS SIG?? Amarisa

User avatar
aishsharma
Frequent Member
Posts: 1301
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:58 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: SilkroadSalvation
Contact:

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by aishsharma »

the 572 ppl probbly had chars like: "asghasd" or "asjkdghads" and ofcourse "zjhgkvhasd"

but i bet that sdhgsd, sdufygsdf and sdligcv will take their place 5 minutes after the client is up agn...or if its up already
Spoiler!

Theseus - lvl 5x - warrior/rogue

User avatar
curvekiller
Active Member
Posts: 974
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Bavaria
Contact:

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by curvekiller »

CeLL wrote:is there any proof they still play or are affected by this ban?

Uh, uh, uh, spelling error.

OnTopic: This is nothing. Just another random detection by their fail automatic system.
We had a good ban once, 25000 first ban, but that was gone after a week, too, so :?: :arrow: :banghead:
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*


Guild Wars 2


Still checking SRF for the community.

User avatar
CeLL
Senior Member
Posts: 4441
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by CeLL »

curvekiller wrote:
CeLL wrote:is there any proof they still play or are affected by this ban?

Uh, uh, uh, spelling error.

OnTopic: This is nothing. Just another random detection by their fail automatic system.
We had a good ban once, 25000 first ban, but that was gone after a week, too, so :?: :arrow: :banghead:



Affect
1. influence somebody or something
to act upon or have an effect on somebody or something

so i gues i should have said
"is there any proof they still play or that this will have an effect on them."
not so much spelling as grammar.
Last edited by CeLL on Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
^^Thanks Thomas42

User avatar
Strwarrior
Veteran Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:41 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: ....

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by Strwarrior »

aishsharma wrote:the 572 ppl probbly had chars like: "asghasd" or "asjkdghads" and ofcourse "zjhgkvhasd"

but i bet that sdhgsd, sdufygsdf and sdligcv will take their place 5 minutes after the client is up agn...or if its up already

lol
Image

HUUU MADE THIS SIG?? Amarisa

User avatar
curvekiller
Active Member
Posts: 974
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Bavaria
Contact:

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by curvekiller »

CeLL wrote:
curvekiller wrote:
CeLL wrote:is there any proof they still play or are affected by this ban?

Uh, uh, uh, spelling error.

OnTopic: This is nothing. Just another random detection by their fail automatic system.
We had a good ban once, 25000 first ban, but that was gone after a week, too, so :?: :arrow: :banghead:



Affect
1. influence somebody or something
to act upon or have an effect on somebody or something

so i gues i should have said
"is there any proof they still play or that this will have an effect on them."
not so much spelling as grammar.

Yes, you can say "Is there any proof they still lay or that this will affect them?", too.
Btw, i'm from Germany :D and currently in the US as an exchange student lol.
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*


Guild Wars 2


Still checking SRF for the community.

User avatar
Barotix
Ex-Staff
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:55 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Sand

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by Barotix »

I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
Maddening
Image

User avatar
CeLL
Senior Member
Posts: 4441
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by CeLL »

Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.


thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.
Image
^^Thanks Thomas42

User avatar
.AWAKE.
Advanced Member
Posts: 2070
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:06 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Rome

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by .AWAKE. »

CeLL wrote:
Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.


thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.


my thoughts exactly..
Image

User avatar
majincooler
Active Member
Posts: 579
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:17 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Odin

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by majincooler »

.AWAKE. wrote:
CeLL wrote:
Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.


thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.


my thoughts exactly..


There isn't a community anymore. Don't you see it's the same 10-15 users posting in almost all the topics? Silkroad is dead, hence these forums are dead. If MOD can show us statistics about how many posts, topics, registered users per day go through Silkroad-related sections, I m pretty sure you ll be convinced, or atleast know that its nowhere near how it was before.
Image

Quit SRO.

User avatar
.AWAKE.
Advanced Member
Posts: 2070
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:06 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Rome

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by .AWAKE. »

that totally justifies the MODS bashing the only remaining community they have left on there forums..
Image

User avatar
majincooler
Active Member
Posts: 579
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:17 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Odin

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by majincooler »

.AWAKE. wrote:that totally justifies the MODS bashing the only remaining community they have left on there forums..


I am not creating a justification. I m just highlighting the part where CeLL said the entire community, he made it sound like as if we were hundreds of active posters in an interactive community.
Image

Quit SRO.

User avatar
dom
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9962
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:46 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: västkustskt

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by dom »

Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.


+1
Image

User avatar
curvekiller
Active Member
Posts: 974
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Bavaria
Contact:

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by curvekiller »

dom wrote:
Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.


+1

omagawd, all the mods hate us :x :(
Image
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*


Guild Wars 2


Still checking SRF for the community.

User avatar
CeLL
Senior Member
Posts: 4441
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by CeLL »

majincooler wrote:
.AWAKE. wrote:that totally justifies the MODS bashing the only remaining community they have left on there forums..


I am not creating a justification. I m just highlighting the part where CeLL said the entire community, he made it sound like as if we were hundreds of active posters in an interactive community.

i didnt make it look like anyhthing, that is simply how you precieved it. it doesnt matter if it were 5 people, its still a little rude.

and @ AWAKE they have otl dont forget.
Image
^^Thanks Thomas42

User avatar
dom
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9962
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:46 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: västkustskt

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by dom »

curvekiller wrote:
dom wrote:
Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.


+1

omagawd, all the mods hate us :x :(
Image



http://pan-am.uniserve.com/pg000005.htm
Image

User avatar
curvekiller
Active Member
Posts: 974
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Bavaria
Contact:

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by curvekiller »

Image
Still want to kill me?
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*


Guild Wars 2


Still checking SRF for the community.

User avatar
dom
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9962
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:46 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: västkustskt

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by dom »

Image
Image

User avatar
TheKnight
Veteran Member
Posts: 3067
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 5:11 pm
Location: leagueoflegends

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by TheKnight »

dom wrote:Image

Thats just like my pet rabbit, died 1 year ago :(
Image

Image
League of Legends EUW - Summoner Name: Th3Knight

User avatar
curvekiller
Active Member
Posts: 974
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Bavaria
Contact:

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by curvekiller »

Image
Edit: My pet died 1 year ago, too :cry:.
Last edited by curvekiller on Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*


Guild Wars 2


Still checking SRF for the community.

User avatar
Swindler
Forum God
Posts: 11256
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:49 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Pimpas Paradise.

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by Swindler »

Is this like selfmade pictures? They're not funny :(

User avatar
TheKnight
Veteran Member
Posts: 3067
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 5:11 pm
Location: leagueoflegends

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by TheKnight »

HejsaN wrote:Is this like selfmade pictures? They're not funny :(

hmm...maybe we should go back to topic itself indeed...

Moar bunnys!
Image

Image
League of Legends EUW - Summoner Name: Th3Knight

User avatar
Barotix
Ex-Staff
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:55 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Sand

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by Barotix »

CeLL wrote:
Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.


thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.


np, anytime broski.
Maddening
Image

User avatar
PR0METHEUS
Senior Member
Posts: 4093
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:30 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: JoyMax banning

Post by PR0METHEUS »

CeLL wrote:is there any proof they still play or are effected by this ban?


+1. I'll start believing it more when active leaders of big botting guilds are banned permanently. I'll really know something GREAT is happening when entire botting guilds, or even 2/3rds, are banned from a server.
Missing the good times in SRO... :love:

SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)

Post Reply

Return to “Silkroad General Discussion”