crazyskwrls wrote:your completely ignorant of these "logical" stats
most of the first world countries pay farmers not to grow food and they will throw away any food surplus
they rather throw away these food rather than give it to anyone who needs it
if u stop eating, they throw more shit away, ur not helping anyone
While I may agree with your statement, it's not that they would
rather throw it away, it is that it becomes more costly to package/identify/ship the food in a usable form to affected countries. Then add in the previous problem, i.e. certain regimes are not set up to handle/accept food, or store it, or distribute it, and certain regimes will simply not accept the help, or they will simply steal it and use it for their own ends.
We have more than enough food in the US today. I was brought up to eat everything on my plate so as not to waste it. You want to change something, cook less food, take longer to eat it, etc.
We would have to change our entire way of life to be simpler. But due to the American stressed-out, rush rush rush, work/eat/play hard, time becomes a factor and we don't do what we should. That, and not everyone in the US likes the idea of spending money and time to help someone overseas when we have our own problems (currently, huge problems in the financial industry and our economy). This also spreads out further and makes us all consumers, rather than producers. Thus the lack of acceptance of an electric car, which has been available and doable since the 1980's.
There is no one simple solution. Some people prefer not to eat meat. That's fine. I can't change my work/eating habits enough, so I eat it (although probably less than others). Moderation is something that - while it's not frowned upon - doesn't seem to exist well in the US.
If faith is a crutch, I'm not limping anymore.