Anti-Bot thingy

A place for general discussion about Silkroad Online. Talk about the game or ask questions. Please keep threads Silkroad Online related.
User avatar
William-CL
Forum Legend
Posts: 7363
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:10 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: N/A

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by William-CL »

SpInKsTaR wrote:Crap idea.
Why cant they get protection so that nothing is able to inject sro_client.exe and connect successfully, Punkbusters? Maybe a REAL GameGuard that works? Develop own protection? -_-

or even a Button in the Actions menu "Report Botter" and GM's check it out

Lazy joymax

What's this about injecting :roll:


And I'm sure we'll get report butting sooner or later. I mean Csro has it. Ksro. Jsro Im sure has it lol.
Image

SpInKsTaR
Valued Member
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:45 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Pacific
Contact:

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by SpInKsTaR »

Injecting..as in modifying the sro_client.exe

They could just have a serverside MD5 Checksum and if it isnt the right size it will boot you off the server
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
PileOfMush
Valued Member
Posts: 456
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:55 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Venus

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by PileOfMush »

SpInKsTaR wrote:Injecting..as in modifying the sro_client.exe

They could just have a serverside MD5 Checksum and if it isnt the right size it will boot you off the server


They don't even need to modify the SRO client to make a bot. You just need to read and write to the data stream between the client and server. In effect, you run a parallel client... and if I'm not mistaken, you can read/write to the memory SRO_Client uses to gather some other info or perform certain actions. If I had continued down a more pure programming path and not diverted to become a database programmer, I'd probably even know how to do this crap. I just know how they do it, if not exactly the specifics of how to do it.

All this is a buncha BS tho... they can do so many things to solve the problem and they just don't even try. I mean these people aren't idiots. They aren't scratching their heads wondering how all these bots are getting away with it. It's obvious that they do not want to put forth any effort because they aren't.

BTW, I've also considered that idea of flagging bots hitting bot points back when I actually thought JMax was looking for a solution. It's a good plan. Too bad they aren't interested.

The players have a solution... bot traps. <3
Venus: Crush
Oasis: BuryMe

User avatar
streetrobban
Active Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 8:22 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Aege

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by streetrobban »

I tried Rappelz before. And when I played it there was stones for bots to hit on, if you kept on hitting you get kicked. But I was noob so I tried to break the stone, I actually bought a special hammer that I thought would break the stone. Finally some other player told me it was for bots :)
Aege
Level: 73 | Build: Pure STR [Fire/Light/Cold/Heuksal]
Level: 63 | Build: Pure INT [Wizard/Cleric] (FF to 90)

Athens (inactive)
Level: 46 | Build: Pure INT [Fire/Light/Cold/Bicheon] (farming)
Level: 27 | Build: Pure STR [Rouge/Cleric]

User avatar
wildmanfrost
Hi, I'm New Here
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:21 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Michigan, USA

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by wildmanfrost »

PileOfMush wrote:
SpInKsTaR wrote:Injecting..as in modifying the sro_client.exe

They could just have a serverside MD5 Checksum and if it isnt the right size it will boot you off the server


They don't even need to modify the SRO client to make a bot. You just need to read and write to the data stream between the client and server. In effect, you run a parallel client... and if I'm not mistaken, you can read/write to the memory SRO_Client uses to gather some other info or perform certain actions. If I had continued down a more pure programming path and not diverted to become a database programmer, I'd probably even know how to do this crap. I just know how they do it, if not exactly the specifics of how to do it.

All this is a buncha BS tho... they can do so many things to solve the problem and they just don't even try. I mean these people aren't idiots. They aren't scratching their heads wondering how all these bots are getting away with it. It's obvious that they do not want to put forth any effort because they aren't.

BTW, I've also considered that idea of flagging bots hitting bot points back when I actually thought JMax was looking for a solution. It's a good plan. Too bad they aren't interested.

The players have a solution... bot traps. <3


We trapped the entire city of Jangan last night. That is the solution. A community sponsored gold bot killing spree. Our NPC thieves had the entire Jangan gold bot population running inline to be killed.

This is the way to go. De-level all of them back to Jangan and keep them pinned in!!

Joymax makes too much off the bots to do it them selves. If every server pulled together, we could stop them! And then we would easily know who the player bots are, and if so, choose to shun them.

SpInKsTaR
Valued Member
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:45 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Pacific
Contact:

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by SpInKsTaR »

Easier said then done
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
PR0METHEUS
Senior Member
Posts: 4093
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:30 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by PR0METHEUS »

Hey, if I knew that I could stay logged in afk all day without getting DC'd, AND know that hunters and traders would leave me alone in thief suit, I'd set up a transport outside of Jangan and let the bot trap run while I go to work. Maybe have some clerics come by and heal me now and then while they PVP so my pots don't run out.

Sadly, my client locks up sometimes, and I do DC randomly. :(
Missing the good times in SRO... :love:

SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)

User avatar
PileOfMush
Valued Member
Posts: 456
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:55 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Venus

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by PileOfMush »

Ah so the truth finally comes to light! The client DCs users "at random" so the bots (who aren't using sro_client.exe) have a chance to run freeeeeee!

Jmax, you're magnificent!
Venus: Crush
Oasis: BuryMe

Cy <ash>
New Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:06 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Solihull

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by Cy <ash> »

They wouldnt implement this in to sro cuz joymax are bot supporters, if joymax were not bot supporters they would of got rid of bots along time ago.
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
Amalie
Valued Member
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:08 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Babel

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by Amalie »

Awwwwwwwwww moon rabbits thats so cute :love:
<< banned for proof of botting. -cin >>

User avatar
XMoshe
Ex-Staff
Posts: 17293
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:13 am
Location: Ghosting around

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by XMoshe »

Cy <ash> wrote:They wouldnt implement this in to sro cuz joymax are bot supporters, if joymax were not bot supporters they would of got rid of bots along time ago.


Nice user bar..It suggests something but meh ^_^
Image
Props to chrisorg for the sig <3

Cy <ash>
New Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:06 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Solihull

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by Cy <ash> »

[SW]XMoshe wrote:
Cy <ash> wrote:They wouldnt implement this in to sro cuz joymax are bot supporters, if joymax were not bot supporters they would of got rid of bots along time ago.


Nice user bar..It suggests something but meh ^_^


Lol yer its for peeps like you who allways accuse without evidence, so many times when I try and stick up for bots cuz there my m8s and people like you say things like that. Thats y my sig says that. All the nice legits im not waring against u lol.

Its my own private war Legit Vs Asshole Legits.

Any way this thread isnt about my sig but meh wtever.
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
XMoshe
Ex-Staff
Posts: 17293
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:13 am
Location: Ghosting around

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by XMoshe »

Cy <ash> wrote:
[SW]XMoshe wrote:
Cy <ash> wrote:They wouldnt implement this in to sro cuz joymax are bot supporters, if joymax were not bot supporters they would of got rid of bots along time ago.


Nice user bar..It suggests something but meh ^_^


Lol yer its for peeps like you who allways accuse without evidence, so many times when I try and stick up for bots cuz there my m8s and people like you say things like that. Thats y my sig says that. All the nice legits im not waring against u lol.

Its my own private war Legit Vs Asshole Legits.

Any way this thread isnt about my sig but meh wtever.


Give me one quote on this entire forum where I accuse someone of botting rofl ^_^
Image
Props to chrisorg for the sig <3

User avatar
Summanus
Casual Member
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 4:27 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Venus

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by Summanus »

Cy <ash> wrote:
[SW]XMoshe wrote:
Cy <ash> wrote:They wouldnt implement this in to sro cuz joymax are bot supporters, if joymax were not bot supporters they would of got rid of bots along time ago.


Nice user bar..It suggests something but meh ^_^


Lol yer its for peeps like you who allways accuse without evidence, so many times when I try and stick up for bots cuz there my m8s and people like you say things like that. Thats y my sig says that. All the nice legits im not waring against u lol.

Its my own private war Legit Vs Asshole Legits.

Any way this thread isnt about my sig but meh wtever.


OMFG MY EYES!! MY EYES DAMMIT!
"So that is what hell is. I would never have believed it.
You remember: the fire and brimstone, the torture.
Ah! the farce. There is no need for torture: hell is other people."

Cy <ash>
New Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:06 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Solihull

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by Cy <ash> »

[SW]XMoshe wrote:
Give me one quote on this entire forum where I accuse someone of botting rofl ^_^


It doesnt take an Einstein to work out what your trying to imply. But you know u should leave it right there tbh dont want to turn this thread into what most of the other threads on this forum are about.
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

User avatar
XMoshe
Ex-Staff
Posts: 17293
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:13 am
Location: Ghosting around

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by XMoshe »

Cy <ash> wrote:
[SW]XMoshe wrote:
Give me one quote on this entire forum where I accuse someone of botting rofl ^_^


It doesnt take an Einstein to work out what your trying to imply. But you know u should leave it right there tbh dont want to turn this thread into what most of the other threads on this forum are about.


Sure w/ ever...But I just wanted to make sure I'm not the guy you say I am : )
Image
Props to chrisorg for the sig <3

User avatar
OlHybrid
Casual Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:00 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Absolute or relative?

Re: Anti-Bot thingy

Post by OlHybrid »

wildmanfrost wrote:We trapped the entire city of Jangan last night. That is the solution.

Yes and no. It may make a small dent in the bot companies' revenues and it's probably the only active way to interfere with their grinding, however it should not be the players' duty to do JM's work, while still paying them.
The community is just too weak as a whole to make players' efforts worthwile in the long run anyway.
And unfortunately as someone else said, JM doesn't have the will to take serious steps, everyone should be pretty clear about that one by now.
I mean, an icon popping in game every hour, asking you enter an image code within 15 minutes (or any of the suggestions filling up their fora for that matter), is that hard?
Asking for powerleveling is like asking for someone else to hold your junk while you're taking a leak.
The words "skilled" and "rogue" have NOTHING to do close to each other for whatever reason.
Trice wrote:If you want to flame, take it to 4chan.

Post Reply

Return to “Silkroad General Discussion”