Forgot about this thread.
agent420 wrote:...inconsistent voting record...
I should just stop here because if the person that wrote this can't even get his voting record right than it probably says a lot about the rest of his material. Paul's voting record is one of his staples. He is consistent with the Constitution.
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/71/agent420 wrote:...and archaic 19th century worldview...
That statement is abhorrently disrespectful to our founding fathers. It basically says they were wrong and this guy knows better.
agent420 wrote:...it's also the fact that his hordes of extremist followers have been collectively crapping their pants over him for the past several months now. It's admittedly refreshing to see an anti-war Republican on the stage, but that doesn't justify the cult of personality being built around him, especially when you factor in the fact that his policy initiatives run the gamut from returning to the gold standard and phasing out public education to demolishing the FBI and privatizing the military. Just Google Ron Paul and you'll find a wealth of bizarre, Stalinist devotion, often manifested in slavish praise on Youtube comment boards.
He wouldn't be getting so much praise if his views weren't well receive or on the verge of isolation from the political norm. This person fails to see we're praising the message, not the messenger. He just happens to be the only one giving it, or one of little.
agent420 wrote:A quick look at history disproves the claims I've heard made by Ronpaulogists: food and drug companies wouldn't self-regulate if we destroyed the FDA (in fact, they were dumping snake oil and arsenic into their goods with impunity before it existed)...
He's basically saying that if the FDA was taken away tomorrow that companies would get rid of established guidelines and start treating their customers like shit. Retarded. Part of why consumers could be taken advantage of long ago was one part a lack of science, another part too much trust in their fellow man. There's lots of reasons this stuff would be very rare in a free market, ie no govt regulation.
agent420 wrote:the gold standard isn't some magical inflation-proof cure-all (in fact, gold standard currency undergoes sporadic, wild spasms of inflation and deflation)...
I could care less about a metal standard as well. I do want the federal reserve abolished and our currency at least backed by gold. I don't know what his guy is smoking with gold being inflated. I'm pretty sure gold has remained about the same price as in 1913 but our dollar is only a couple cents compared to that of 1913 (I'm too lazy to look up official #'s.) Also, the definition of inflation:
A persistent increase in the level of consumer prices or a persistent decline in the purchasing power of money,
caused by an increase in available currency and credit beyond the proportion of available goods and services.
That doesn't happen with gold, much, fyi.
agent420 wrote:...and a lack of public schools left much of the population too illiterate to perform most of today's jobs.
A lack of the Dept of Edu. does not equate to dismantling public schools. It just means the power goes back to where it belongs, close to or at the parents hands.
agent420 wrote:Actually, when I said that the 19-year-old idealists were the worst offenders, I left out the white supremacists and conspiracy theorists, who have flocked to the nutty Dr. Paul like a messiah. David Duke, a former governor of Louisiana and the nation's most prominent KKK member and neo-Nazi, is a fervent supporter of Ron Paul and his 19th century ideals, and rants on his official website about the vast Zionist media conspiracy against the man he literally calls his "king." If it was just this guy supporting Paul, I wouldn't make a big deal about it, but I've had a hard time finding a single white supremacist, 9/11 truther or any other that doesn't rally behind the only presidential candidate to claim that the 1964 Civil Rights Act "increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty."
So the next time someone in a sandwich board waving a bunch of pamphlets around tries to talk to you about Dr. Ron Paul, just remember that the guy is supporting a certifiable nutcase.
So what if retards support someone? The money they might donate goes towards furthering the message of freedom and not what they could spend it on.
On the Civil Rights issue:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul188.htmlI'll address what Kewtie said later.