Best and Worst Movie of 2007

Hitman144 · Post by **Hitman144** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:06 am

best: 300 ,american pie beta house, i am legend , transformers

worst: harry potty

huejas · Post by **huejas** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:19 am

Best:
-Superbad
-Transformers
-Borat
-I Am Legend

Worst:
-Dan in Real Life
-Shrek 3
-Good Luck Chuck

Yet to watch:
-300
-The Bourne Ultimatum
-Hot Fuzz
-Simpson Movie
-American Gangster
-Knocked Up (saw half)
-Pan's Labrynth
-Saw 4 <<<<<<< nobdy mentioned it
-Jackass 2.5 (2007 or 2008?)

hmmmm i have alot of movies to watch ....most of which will probably be added to the best

crazyskwrls · Post by **crazyskwrls** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:37 am

Best:
-Superbad
-I Am Legend
-Hot Fuzz
-300

Worst:
-Simpson Movie

y do so many people hate epic movie it wasnt that bad, saw 4 was okay took me a while to realize the movie is kinda backwards

olivierd · Post by **olivierd** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:13 am

best: ratatouille
worst: rush hour 3 (dude stop screaming for f*ck sake)

and i expected more from i am legend, it looked like it was going te be best movie ever but it was rather average.

my favorite all time is still

ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED ??

====> GLADIATOR !

Website · Post by **satman83** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:18 am

dom wrote:
satman83 wrote:
dom wrote:Batman = historically inaccurate account of New York.

ummm...sorry to burst your bubble but its set in Gotham city

Hate to burst your bubble, but you're an idiot:

Name and New York City connection

Gotham is known to be architecturally modeled after New York City, but with exaggerated elements of the styles of the city; before Detective Comics #48, Batman's adventures were said to happen in New York City. Gotham City derives its name from a sobriquet for New York City which was first popularized by the author Washington Irving in his satirical work Salmagundi (1807). Irving adopted the name from the story of the Wise Men of Gotham, in which the inhabitants of the town of Gotham (in Nottinghamshire, England) behave like madmen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotham_City

You shouldn't be so quick to try to point out mistakes. There's a reason why I wrote New York, and not Gotham. Think about it, in the context of the argument I pushed.

Ummmm you just quoted wikipedia...so that any credibility for that argument
gone right away, next time use something more credible ok...i didnt think
you were this stupid.

Priam · Post by **Priam** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:22 am

Best: Superbad, the first half of iam legend. And i gotta agree on JacksColon with keira Knightley.

Wordt: Epic movie, the 2nd half of Iam Legend.

Trice · Post by **Trice** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:27 pm

Best
Ultimatum Maaaaaaatt Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaymon (team america voice)
Pan's Labyrinth wonderful film, just plain wonderful
Superbad Thought it was gonna be awful, but some of the best teen-cringe-comedy since Road Trip and AP I... McLovin.
Die Hard 4 The best action movie series ever. Fact.
Departed not as good as it was hyped, but it was good. Standout performance from Wahlberg
Pirates 3 coulda been better, but Johnny saves it
Hot Fuzz of course. :love:

Rush Hour 3 tucker and chan will never get old
Theres a film i cant remember the name of, British film about akid that hooks up with skinhead culture, has a lot of fun, but then things get nasty. Will edit when the name comes to me
300, imax ftw.

Nothing massively stood out for me in 07 like they did in 06, but these were my favourite viewings. Below however, are the wastes of freaking money, unlisted are the ok films, these below are just plain shite.

Worst
Shoot 'em Up - oh clive, clive clive clive, why? why would you make such a bad film?
Beowulf - let down much?
Potter 5- But Emma Watson is still hawt.
Smokin' Aces - Really Really Really Really Really Really Really Really Bad.

Waisha · Post by **Waisha** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:57 pm

Lol @ people saying 300, Transformers, I am Legend, Spiderman and Pirates III are best.

worst^

best: American gangster, it's the only good '07 movie I watched.

Barotix · Post by **Barotix** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:30 pm

satman83 wrote:
dom wrote:
satman83 wrote:
dom wrote:Batman = historically inaccurate account of New York.

ummm...sorry to burst your bubble but its set in Gotham city

Hate to burst your bubble, but you're an idiot:

Name and New York City connection

Gotham is known to be architecturally modeled after New York City, but with exaggerated elements of the styles of the city; before Detective Comics #48, Batman's adventures were said to happen in New York City. Gotham City derives its name from a sobriquet for New York City which was first popularized by the author Washington Irving in his satirical work Salmagundi (1807). Irving adopted the name from the story of the Wise Men of Gotham, in which the inhabitants of the town of Gotham (in Nottinghamshire, England) behave like madmen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotham_City

You shouldn't be so quick to try to point out mistakes. There's a reason why I wrote New York, and not Gotham. Think about it, in the context of the argument I pushed.

Ummmm you just quoted wikipedia...so that any credibility for that argument
gone right away, next time use something more credible ok...i didnt think
you were this stupid.

Sat dude batman takes place in America, and Gotham is styled after New York. Gotham City isn't even a real city :shock:

Post by **dom** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:46 pm

satman83 wrote:
dom wrote:
satman83 wrote:
dom wrote:Batman = historically inaccurate account of New York.

ummm...sorry to burst your bubble but its set in Gotham city

Hate to burst your bubble, but you're an idiot:

Name and New York City connection

Gotham is known to be architecturally modeled after New York City, but with exaggerated elements of the styles of the city; before Detective Comics #48, Batman's adventures were said to happen in New York City. Gotham City derives its name from a sobriquet for New York City which was first popularized by the author Washington Irving in his satirical work Salmagundi (1807). Irving adopted the name from the story of the Wise Men of Gotham, in which the inhabitants of the town of Gotham (in Nottinghamshire, England) behave like madmen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotham_City

You shouldn't be so quick to try to point out mistakes. There's a reason why I wrote New York, and not Gotham. Think about it, in the context of the argument I pushed.

Ummmm you just quoted wikipedia...so that any credibility for that argument
gone right away, next time use something more credible ok...i didnt think
you were this stupid.

lol @ sore loser

With that post you're just proving how much of an idiot you are, again.

Website · Post by **satman83** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:08 pm

dom wrote:
satman83 wrote:
dom wrote:
satman83 wrote:
dom wrote:Batman = historically inaccurate account of New York.

ummm...sorry to burst your bubble but its set in Gotham city

Hate to burst your bubble, but you're an idiot:

Name and New York City connection

Gotham is known to be architecturally modeled after New York City, but with exaggerated elements of the styles of the city; before Detective Comics #48, Batman's adventures were said to happen in New York City. Gotham City derives its name from a sobriquet for New York City which was first popularized by the author Washington Irving in his satirical work Salmagundi (1807). Irving adopted the name from the story of the Wise Men of Gotham, in which the inhabitants of the town of Gotham (in Nottinghamshire, England) behave like madmen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotham_City

You shouldn't be so quick to try to point out mistakes. There's a reason why I wrote New York, and not Gotham. Think about it, in the context of the argument I pushed.

Ummmm you just quoted wikipedia...so that any credibility for that argument
gone right away, next time use something more credible ok...i didnt think
you were this stupid.

lol @ sore loser

With that post you're just proving how much of an idiot you are, again.

how am i a sore loser? when your being a retard! i know Gotham isnt
real and while it may of been originally based on 1930's New York, its
in fact a fictional city.
and how am i proving am an idiot? your the one using a source from wikipedia
and acting like its 100%....looks like those people who say your a stupid
moron are right. Because you are the idiot here, its Gotham not New York
you dumb twat, so what if its based on 1930's new york...doesnt make it
new york you Farking moron.

Post by **dom** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:21 pm

*sigh* here comes the drawing since you don't have the capacity to understand anything

1) The thread is made.

2) Someone brings up that 300 is historically inaccurate.

3) I post the following, showing a picture of one of the monsters to remind that the movie is not based on historical fact, but a fictional graphic novel inspired by the battle. Also, an attempt at baiting Valkasdar to ccorrect me on "and elephants and rhinos in Greece? bought in by desert people??? " proving again, that he can't read and doesn't realize that we don't care about his history lesson:

Valkasdar wrote:
Jstar1 wrote:as for 300 haters, I thought it sucked because of no historical accuracy, but its really made for the action and action only, and the iconic scene when leonidas kicks the persian into the well. there isn't supposed to be a plot when all there is are 300 buffy men fighting persians

Yep I hate it coz of this messup history in there, but if it was only for the action and special effects... the movie is awesome

+1

Why would they even try to make a historical movie if it isn't accurate at all?

This guy looks SOOO FAKE, I bet monsters like this DIDN'T EVEN EXIST

and elephants and rhinos in Greece? bought in by desert people??? WTFFFFFFFFFF

4) I lol at Valksadars point, highlighting my stance on the issue again. It shows that I clearly believe that the movie is based on the graphic novel, as explained in the movie's trailers.

Valkasdar wrote:
Actually, they dont come from the desert, yes nowadays there is a desert, but back in the years when this is happend there was just a normal place were ppl lives (lol) nvm this.
About the elephants... well in the movie they look like some kind copy&pastetd from LOTR but actually in the Myth about this story, it say s that there actually is like 500-600 ppl on elephants... and most of the other were with horses.
And they actually defend sparta from the persians invasion, and they actually was 300 ppl. But the thing is, the milions of persians WIN at the end, kill every spartain and going pass tru this passage. But they were so few at the end. And the other tribes and ppls from the north (nowadays Bulgaria and some of the north Greece) finish and stoped the invasion of the Persians.

This is what the actual history book says about this

lol.

5) After seeing you, among others, trying to beat this into his head I post "Batman = historically inaccurate account of New York." The reason behind this simple, Batman is as historically accurate as 300 is accurate about the battle of thermopylae.

6) Because you're an idiot and can't read, and are anxious to jump on anything to try to disprove me, you post:

satman83 wrote:
dom wrote:Batman = historically inaccurate account of New York.

ummm...sorry to burst your bubble but its set in Gotham city

7) I post my wikipedia antichrist bit of information, I should highlight this part for you: "Gotham is known to be architecturally modeled after New York City, but with exaggerated elements of the styles of the city"

Bold for double emphasis.

Of course, here you go again, like an idiot:

satman83 wrote:its Gotham not New York
you dumb twat, so what if its based on 1930's new york...doesnt make it
new york you Farking moron.

I reply with:

dom wrote:You shouldn't be so quick to try to point out mistakes. There's a reason why I wrote New York, and not Gotham. Think about it, in the context of the argument I pushed.

Bold for emphasis, do I have to be explicit about that part too? I guess I should. I SAID TO REREAD THE THREAD AND REALIZE I'M NOT SAYING THAT GOTHAM IS NEW YORK, did caps help?

To recap: I'm not saying gotham city exists. I'm saying that gotham city is to new york city what 300 is to the battle of thermopylae, which is a movie based on a graphic novel with exaggerated elements of the styles of the battle of thermopylae.

Do I have to break out the photoshop and litterally draw it for you?

You are angry and arguing about something that you didn't even take the time to understand. By writing:

satman83 wrote:its Gotham not New York
you dumb twat, so what if its based on 1930's new york...doesnt make it
new york you Farking moron.

it shows that you're an idiot (as i've explained many times before, in many other threads)

SM-Count · Post by **SM-Count** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:24 pm

I liked Hot Fuzz, thought it was very ingenious. As for worst, really can't think of one, I usually delete bad movies no more than 10% through.

XemnasXD · Post by **XemnasXD** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:31 pm

Hot Fuzz was a great movie....

Website · Post by **satman83** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:33 pm

@ dom

Sorry to burst your bubble but instead of trying to be a know it all cunt
maybe you should of looked at at i posted a big more clearly ok

ummm...sorry to burst your bubble but its set in Gotham city

notice the " :roll:

" face...its called sarcasim...your the one who took it too
far and per usual you have to be right and so dont bother to really read
what i wrote and so post like you normally do, try to disprove people by
act like a moronic child by ignore what anyone posts just so long as you
get your point across.

So please do everyone a favour and actually take the time to read what they
post ok...not to hard now is it :roll:

< oh look i used that face again...do
you see it know...idiot.

Post by **dom** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:36 pm

satman83 wrote:@ dom

Sorry to burst your bubble but instead of trying to be a know it all cunt
maybe you should of looked at at i posted a big more clearly ok

ummm...sorry to burst your bubble but its set in Gotham city

satman83 wrote:Because you are the idiot here, its Gotham not New York
you dumb twat

^ So which one do you believe, that it's set in gotham (of course, your universal sarcasm emoticon means it's set in new york!) Or, the second one, that gotham is not new york and it's set in gotham?

satman83 wrote:your the one who took it too
far and per usual

satman83 wrote:
Ummmm you just quoted wikipedia...so that any credibility for that argument
gone right away, next time use something more credible ok...i didnt think
you were this stupid.

satman83 wrote:how am i a sore loser? when your being a retard! i know Gotham isnt
real and while it may of been originally based on 1930's New York, its
in fact a fictional city.
and how am i proving am an idiot? your the one using a source from wikipedia
and acting like its 100%....looks like those people who say your a stupid
moron are right. Because you are the idiot here, its Gotham not New York
you dumb twat, so what if its based on 1930's new york...doesnt make it
new york you Farking moron.

You phail x2

Website · Post by **satman83** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:39 pm

no i think your trying to turn it around by proving that your 0% reliable wiki
post is right...

i used that face at the time and anyone can see that...but you ignored it and
acted like an idiot just like you always do, its like you have this strange mental
condition where you always have to be right and ignore what people say

seriously get some help ok :roll:

Post by **dom** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:44 pm

satman83 wrote:no i think your trying to turn it around by proving that your 0% reliable wiki
post is right...

Try google. It's common knowledge. I found it in the Batman Encyclopedia, and on various comic book fan sites - cross checking wikipedia. Not to mention, wikipedia is as accurate as encyclopedia britannica, according to studies ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4530930.stm - is BBC a credible source?)

satman83 wrote:
acted like an idiot just like you always do, its like you have this strange mental
condition where you always have to be right and ignore what people say

Isn't that what you're doing now? Even though i've ripped your arguments apart?

satman83 wrote:
seriously get some help ok

Is that sarcasim [sic] ?

Barotix · Post by **Barotix** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:48 pm

dude I'm surprised you didn't catch Dom's [Professor sarcasm's] analogy earlier and to make things worst now you are trying to argue simply because the credibility of Wikipedia is questionable. Sat dude do you not realize Google is having a love affair with Wikipedia :shock:

seriously its like every search on google related to the sciences now a days leads to a wiki

.

OT:, EDIT: Worst: Spiderman 3 [wth was this garbage spidey was a friggin emo

, and the dude they had as venom :banghead:

]

Post by **dom** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:51 pm

Barotix wrote:Worst: Spiderman 3 [wth was this garbage spidey was a friggin emo , and the dude they had as venom ]

The reason why I didn't name it one of the worst, in my list, is because I haven't been able to see it all. I always start watching it, get bored, and turn it off.

XemnasXD · Post by **XemnasXD** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:53 pm

Best: The movies i liked Bold are the best of them...
Pans Pabyrinth
PotC: AT Worlds End (Davy Jones=badass)
The Last King of Scotland
Smokin Aces
300
ATHF:Movie Film for Theaters Colon
Transformers
Futurama: Benders Big Score
The Simpsons Movie
SuperBad
Across the Universe
I Am Legend
Juno

Worst: I don't really watch bad movies but i saw these ones...by mistake >>
Hitman
Epic Movie

Post by **dom** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:55 pm

XemnasXD wrote:Best: The movies i liked Bold are the best of them...
Pans Pabyrinth
Smokin Aces
300
The Simpsons Movie
SuperBad
I Am Legend

Worst: I don't really watch bad movies but i saw these ones...by mistake >>
Epic Movie

+1

I just remembered about Smokin' Aces. I watched it over the days I didn't have internet/cable/telephone - even though it was action, it undoubtedly had an artistic direction to it.

I liked superbad too, I know it was stupid (it's the kind of stupid you're not supposed to take serious) but it wasn't overdoing it like epic movie.

Website · Post by **satman83** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:58 pm

dom wrote:
Barotix wrote:Worst: Spiderman 3 [wth was this garbage spidey was a friggin emo , and the dude they had as venom ]

The reason why I didn't name it one of the worst, in my list, is because I haven't been able to see it all. I always start watching it, get bored, and turn it off.

watch the first 10 mins, and u will have seen a good movie...after that turn it off.
Also has any one seen "The Host" or do people not watch films with subs?

Post by **dom** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:00 pm

satman83 wrote:
dom wrote:
Barotix wrote:Worst: Spiderman 3 [wth was this garbage spidey was a friggin emo , and the dude they had as venom ]

The reason why I didn't name it one of the worst, in my list, is because I haven't been able to see it all. I always start watching it, get bored, and turn it off.

watch the first 10 mins, and u will have seen a good movie...after that turn it off.

I watched a bit more than half.

XemnasXD · Post by **XemnasXD** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:01 pm

I made the mistake of taking superbad to seriously the first time i saw it and was very disappointed...after i realized what kind of movie it was i watched it again and i liked it better the second time around

Spiderman 3 was disappointing but i blame the writers....i think Topher did a good job but after Alfred Molina as Doc. Oc no super villian even venom could compete with that...

Post by **dom** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:07 pm

XemnasXD wrote:I made the mistake of taking superbad to seriously the first time i saw it and was very disappointed...after i realized what kind of movie it was i watched it again and i liked it better the second time around

Spiderman 3 was disappointing but i blame the writers....i think Topher did a good job but after Alfred Molina as Doc. Oc no super villian even venom could compete with that...

I watched superbad with friends, I think if the first time I would of watched it alone, I would of not enjoyed it at all. It's like mario party I guess, it's not fun unless you do it with lots of people.

Website · Post by **satman83** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:19 pm

So what no one see "The Host" then?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0468492/

XemnasXD · Post by **XemnasXD** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:28 pm

The best Foreign Film i saw this year was

Paprika

trippy little movie by satoshi kon an amazing director or animation..

heroo · Post by **heroo** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:15 am

For all the I am Legend haters:

it's a very good movie, but people simply expected TOO MUCH, and therefor many find it suck.

i bet if there wasn't such a big publicity about this movie, almost all people would find the movie good.

but yeah, Will Smith is the best actor alive. i focking ALMOST got tears in my eyes when that dog died

Scott · Post by **Scott** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:19 am

BEST - 300

WORST - I Am Legend

(didn't really understand I am legend)