I lol @ the debates

Post by **dom** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:46 am

discuss

BrokenSaint · Post by **BrokenSaint** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:48 am

Can I ask why?

redneck · Post by **redneck** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:49 am

seriously I can't believe Britney lost custody of her children...

She's just going through hard times now. WHY CANT YOU JUST LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!!!

magisuns · Post by **magisuns** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:50 am

<<:roll:>>- edit..
Lets discuss~ the order of the food chain instead =)
The people have h4xd every pop stars life... and you can see an example through Britney. Why do people like 2 pick on them like that... dam life hax0rz

Silver0 · Post by **Silver0** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:57 am

There all scum Politicians are all scums in america
The ones that are not, get murdered

CrimsonNuker · Post by **CrimsonNuker** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:21 am

magisuns wrote:<<:roll:>>- edit..
Lets discuss~ the order of the food chain instead =)
The people have h4xd every pop stars life... and you can see an example through Britney. Why do people like 2 pick on them like that... dam life hax0rz

LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!!!!1!1!!1111!1

taintofsleep · Post by **taintofsleep** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:26 am

I never used to know anything about celebrities. However, I work as a cashier now. I get bored and read the magazines. It's all crazy man.

Brittany is becoming the tabloids favorite target. Now they are trying to move to Jamie.

At least some good stories are going on in the magazines now days. Like how Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are hanging out with their kids. Dang, they wanted 12 kids!!! Now they are shooting for 9, or have 9 I think.

Vandall · Post by **Vandall** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:56 am

may I ask...who cares

Fat_Smurf · Post by **Fat_Smurf** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:01 am

taintofsleep wrote:I never used to know anything about celebrities. However, I work as a cashier now. I get bored and read the magazines. It's all crazy man.

Brittany is becoming the tabloids favorite target. Now they are trying to move to Jamie.

At least some good stories are going on in the magazines now days. Like how Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are hanging out with their kids. Dang, they wanted 12 kids!!! Now they are shooting for 9, or have 9 I think.

poor angy

taintofsleep · Post by **taintofsleep** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:26 am

Fat_Smurf wrote:
taintofsleep wrote:I never used to know anything about celebrities. However, I work as a cashier now. I get bored and read the magazines. It's all crazy man.

Brittany is becoming the tabloids favorite target. Now they are trying to move to Jamie.

At least some good stories are going on in the magazines now days. Like how Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are hanging out with their kids. Dang, they wanted 12 kids!!! Now they are shooting for 9, or have 9 I think.

poor angy

She doesn't have to worry about it. They adopt from 3rd world countries for some reason. (think it has to do that they aren't good enough parents to pass for adoption in the US)

magisuns · Post by **magisuns** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:26 am

CrimsonNuker wrote:
magisuns wrote:<<:roll:>>- edit..
Lets discuss~ the order of the food chain instead =)
The people have h4xd every pop stars life... and you can see an example through Britney. Why do people like 2 pick on them like that... dam life hax0rz

LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!!!!1!1!!1111!1

I is in favour of Britney

Can I haz my Samwedge now?

Priam · Post by **Priam** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:55 pm

Let's discuss Dom, opinions: Is he hot?

Swindler · Post by **Swindler** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:56 pm

What do you people think of the crowding taxes?

Waisha · Post by **Waisha** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:21 pm

dom 'aint nothin' without his breast implants.

Draquish · Post by **Draquish** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:35 pm

IMO Obama won it. Even though he was stuttering like a b1tch. :roll:

XemnasXD · Post by **XemnasXD** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 8:02 pm

wow i love how the OTL decided to act retarded and go completely off topic....way to go!

OT: i agree with draquish anyway.....Obama won that

Nuklear · Post by **Nuklear** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:34 pm

I think this is the direction future debates should be based upon. Even though it was more of the same I just fell in love with with the round table atmosphere. Good to see what the evolution of 'debates' might be.
After seeing the nth debate I feel that people will vote more on feeling than issues/experience. To me, all the candidates in their respective parties are the same except for the way they act. I see very little disagreement on issues and if there is any it's very minuet. It also seems that people, this is only two states though, are latching onto the 'change' propaganda which all the Dems and Ron Paul are using. If the trend of the states voting more for the Dems keeps up I'll bet we'll have a Dem president. None of the Rep, besides Paul who's still polling low, really has any change a part of their platform. Change as in the White House politics anyway.
Assuming the trend does keep up I predict a McCain (or Paul if Rep don't wake up) v. the Dems (which are still too close to call imo) with the Dem winning against McCain or most likely winning against, hopeful, Paul.

As to the debate 'winners'

[SD]draquish wrote:IMO Obama won it. Even though he was stuttering like a b1tch.

I completely disagree. Obama was tired over the work he's been doing and it showed. After hearing good things about his victory speech I was very underwhelmed by his performance. Like I said above, there aren't many things differentiating candidates and Obama's strong point, charisma, didn't get to me.
I felt Edwards took the floor for the Dems. He had a lot of passion, talked about change, and a couple of strats. I also thought Richardson did fairly well considering I knew nothing about his positions. He did reiterate his record too much though.
For the Rep I have to go for the lite of the night. All the candidates seemed to argue and were very serious except Thompson. He's usually an uptight dick but last night was very lively and humorous. I don't like him because he's another warmonger like Rudy but he had an "I don't care" tude. Humor ftw. Lastly, it's always nice when Paul gets his crazy liberty ideas out even though he did ramble on like he does sometimes.

XemnasXD wrote:wow i love how the OTL decided to act retarded and go completely off topic....way to go!

I try not to comment on it anymore since the mods have a laissez faire policy.

Caras · Post by **Caras** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:39 pm

Nuklear wrote:I think this is the direction future debates should be based upon. Even though it was more of the same I just fell in love with with the round table atmosphere. Good to see what the evolution of 'debates' might be.
After seeing the nth debate I feel that people will vote more on feeling than issues/experience. To me, all the candidates in their respective parties are the same except for the way they act. I see very little disagreement on issues and if there is any it's very minuet. It also seems that people, this is only two states though, are latching onto the 'change' propaganda which all the Dems and Ron Paul are using. If the trend of the states voting more for the Dems keeps up I'll bet we'll have a Dem president. None of the Rep, besides Paul who's still polling low, really has any change a part of their platform. Change as in the White House politics anyway.
Assuming the trend does keep up I predict a McCain (or Paul if Rep don't wake up) v. the Dems (which are still too close to call imo) with the Dem winning against McCain or most likely winning against, hopeful, Paul.

As to the debate 'winners'
[SD]draquish wrote:IMO Obama won it. Even though he was stuttering like a b1tch.

I completely disagree. Obama was tired over the work he's been doing and it showed. After hearing good things about his victory speech I was very underwhelmed by his performance. Like I said above, there aren't many things differentiating candidates and Obama's strong point, charisma, didn't get to me.
I felt Edwards took the floor for the Dems. He had a lot of passion, talked about change, and a couple of strats. I also thought Richardson did fairly well considering I knew nothing about his positions. He did reiterate his record too much though.
For the Rep I have to go for the lite of the night. All the candidates seemed to argue and were very serious except Thompson. He's usually an uptight dick but last night was very lively and humorous. I don't like him because he's another warmonger like Rudy but he had an "I don't care" tude. Humor ftw. Lastly, it's always nice when Paul gets his crazy liberty ideas out even though he did ramble on like he does sometimes.

XemnasXD wrote:wow i love how the OTL decided to act retarded and go completely off topic....way to go!

I try not to comment on it anymore since the mods have a laissez faire policy.

Ummmmm...
I agree.

DrunkiMunki · Post by **DrunkiMunki** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:05 pm

to lazy to read long posts atm. Im sure i'd agree 2.

magisuns · Post by **magisuns** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Leipo wrote:to lazy to read long posts atm. Im sure i'd agree 2.

lolx I swear there are like 5 different topics in here so far

Post by **dom** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:06 pm

Democrats don't have any viable candidates - it's a joke; the only possible one is Richardson but like the american people are going to elect a mexican.

Nuklear · Post by **Nuklear** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:18 pm

I agree, but we're still talking about the stupid average american who takes things for granted and will vote on feelings and what people tell them. On election day I'm not voting for a socialist or a fascist. If Ron Paul or a better candidate isn't on the ballet I'm going to write-in or skip that question.