2 new "noob" sigs, comment a rate

Flightmeck · Post by **Flightmeck** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:27 pm

Hey all

So i spent the holliday with my grandparents and scense the don't have internet i was getting quite boored after a couple of days. Therefor i tried to be a little creative and made theese two signs.

This was the first one, well not much to say about it, i like planes and i am studdying to become a flight technician so basically my whole existence circles around planes.

The second one, i like this very much my self, and yeah i was listening to some calm musik when i made it ^^ Thinking of the girl i once loved when i made it ^^

Very well, pleace comment and rate them, sorry if a used a little sloppy language and spelling but im in a hurry, got to eat

Edit:

So i tried to change the text but i don't know if it's any better...

I allso tried to create a little less bright lensflare...

The stocks for the first sig (might be better if i linked to them, if so, tell me):

pineapples · Post by **pineapples** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:41 pm

There's nothing noob about your first Signature. In fact, in my eyes, it looks wonderful. I think it has a fantastic focal point, not to mention the isolated yellow looks great with the grayscale background. The only thing I would change about it is the text. I think the font is fine, but to be honest, the position of it is slightly bugging me. However, still, it's a fine Sig. 8/10 on that one.

I think the second one looks nice as well; not as nice as your first one, however. It's not too much to my style, so I'll decline to comment on it. Just one thing, though - I think that the Lens Flare you used to create the focal point is a little too bright. Maybe tone it down a little?

Overall, nice Sigs. Welcome to the AC! :]

Faiien · Post by **Faiien** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:46 pm

This was the first one, well not much to say about it, i like planes and i studdying to become a flightteknichan (spelling?) so basicly my whole existence cirkles around planes.

This was the first one, well not much to say about it, i like planes and i am studying to become a flight technician. So basically my whole existence circles around planes.

spell check just4u

nice sigs, let me see the stock for the plane one and ill give you a rating
but atm ill give it a 7/10

second sig 5/10

cin · Post by **cin** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:46 pm

agreed with fena.

sig 1 > sig 2.

all i'd change in sig 1 is the txt. rest looks good as it is.

agreed with what fena said about the 2nd too, the lens flare is a tad too bright.

all and all, sig 1 gets a 8.5/10 from me. sig 2 gets a 7/10

Waisha · Post by **Waisha** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:51 pm

Sig one is sex.

Flightmeck · Post by **Flightmeck** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:06 pm

Faiien wrote:
This was the first one, well not much to say about it, i like planes and i studdying to become a flightteknichan (spelling?) so basicly my whole existence cirkles around planes.

This was the first one, well not much to say about it, i like planes and i am studying to become a flight technician. So basically my whole existence circles around planes.

spell check just4u

nice sigs, let me see the stock for the plane one and ill give you a rating
but atm ill give it a 7/10

second sig 5/10

hehe thanks for the help with the spelling ^^

You where saying "let me see the stock for the plane one", uhm... im new to this so i don't really get what "the stock" is :oops:

, is it the pictures i have used to make this one (there are 3) before i have done anything to them?

Or is it the whole sig just without the "effects"?

About the lens flare and the text, i'll see what i can do ^^

cin · Post by **cin** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:07 pm

stock is the pic / pics u used for the sig yes :]

Flightmeck · Post by **Flightmeck** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:21 pm

Oh ok, i'm going to update in a min, if everything goes as planned i can try to upload the stocks to ^^

Edit, Updated

0l3n · Post by **0l3n** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:58 pm

Not bad but the first one is way to blured and text needs work on both.

cin · Post by **cin** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:59 pm

imo, the blurry is smex cause brings the focal plane more to the front.

Faiien · Post by **Faiien** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:01 pm

i like the blurring in the background but it would have been better if you eased it off the planes a little so it would create 3 separate layers for your sig

Flightmeck · Post by **Flightmeck** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:05 pm

0l3n wrote:Not bad but the first one is way to blured and text needs work on both.

cin wrote:imo, the blurry is smex cause brings the focal plane more to the front.

I think i'll let the blurr be, becauls as cin sais i think it brings some of the focal, it can be hard to sharpen it without destroying the focus... Or is it a way to do that?

The text will be as it is for a while, i don't have the energy to do anything about it taday anyway, maybe tomorrow ^^

0l3n · Post by **0l3n** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:09 pm

I get why you blured it but I think you blured to much of the sig thats all. 90% of the sig is blured and that makes it look empty.

HOLLAstir · Post by **HOLLAstir** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:10 pm

I agree with cin. I like how it's blurred. Makes the focal stronger. It's a simple sig, but I like it. But def change the text on it. Second one doesn't really tickle me fancy.

Luoma · Post by **Luoma** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:20 pm

I like what you made from those stocks.
Only thing is what everyone else also is saying, the text needs a little work.
Otherwise thats a really nice looking sig

Only talking about the first now.

BrokenSaint · Post by **BrokenSaint** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:25 pm

Lose the lens flare.

Flightmeck · Post by **Flightmeck** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:59 am

Yeah okey, i get it - you don't like the text and you don't like the second ^^ Thank you for the replys

christina · Post by **christina** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:17 pm

I love them both to be honest
9/10 for both of them

Flightmeck · Post by **Flightmeck** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:05 am

christina wrote:I love them both to be honest
9/10 for both of them

Oooh nice, happy to hear that =)
Do you like them better before or after i changed the text/flare? =)