92% naked full int??

Vuesters92 · Post by **Vuesters92** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:59 am

is 92% mag balance naked is a full int?? if so im thinking about adding alittle str to my wizard and still keep the 92%. is that good??

Braka · Post by **Braka** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:16 pm

Vuesters92 wrote:is 92% mag balance naked is a full int?? if so im thinking about adding alittle str to my wizard and still keep the 92%. is that good??

i thought it was 96% for a naked full int but i could be wrong, mabe it changes in later lvls

bowner · Post by **bowner** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:49 pm

most people will disagree but i believe that wizards should have a hybrid build, they 1 hit everything with damage to spare, if you make a hybrid, youll still be able to do that but you can take more then one hit by the enemy.

MrBow · Post by **MrBow** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:54 pm

I'm keeping 90%

Penguin13 · Post by **Penguin13** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:11 pm

Wizards: Pure int is fine. There's a cleric there to buff you so you can tank a few glaives.

Int: 96% naked is pure int. But a 92% naked wouldn't make much of a difference..?

jay0303 · Post by **jay0303** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:59 pm

at lvl 80 int pure need to be 96%

Penguin13 · Post by **Penguin13** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 9:54 pm

At any decent level (above like, 20 I believe is when you start getting a steady %), pure int IS 96%, not needs to be, IS.

MrBow · Post by **MrBow** » Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:08 am

Penguin13 wrote:At any decent level (above like, 20 I believe is when you start getting a steady %), pure int IS 96%, not needs to be, IS.

No thats not true. At lower levels pure int can't be 96% mag balance

Vuesters92 · Post by **Vuesters92** » Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:32 pm

MrBow wrote:
Penguin13 wrote:At any decent level (above like, 20 I believe is when you start getting a steady %), pure int IS 96%, not needs to be, IS.

No thats not true. At lower levels pure int can't be 96% mag balance

wat lvl will a pure int reach 92% mag balance/?

Silkroad Online Forums

92% naked full int??

92% naked full int??

Re: 92% naked full int??

a