So who's gonna see the new Rambo

Stallowned · Post by **Stallowned** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 8:58 pm

I'm gonna be camping outside the movie theater with a little hut and log fire the night before, some woodsman type shit. Gonna be the first one in the theater on opening day.

http://imdb.com/title/tt0462499/

Doppleganger · Post by **Doppleganger** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 8:59 pm

t

EDIT: 1 SEC 1 SEC

bk lol
Yea i want to see it, the trailer was crazy! O_o

redneck · Post by **redneck** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 8:59 pm

ARE YOU SERIOUS!@!!!

New Rambo Movie!!!

YES!!!

Can't Wait

Gotta Call my Chinese Bootlegger

THANK YOU!!!

cin · Post by **cin** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:01 pm

wow.

i thought stallone was done after that last rocky movie o.O

tough dude

x_CodeZero_x · Post by **x_CodeZero_x** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:01 pm

Definately!

CrimsonNuker · Post by **CrimsonNuker** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:02 pm

redneck wrote:ARE YOU SERIOUS!@!!!

New Rambo Movie!!!

YES!!!

Can't Wait

Gotta Call my Chinese Bootlegger

THANK YOU!!!

You dont have to call me, im right here

Vandall · Post by **Vandall** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:02 pm

I saw the preview for it when I went to see "American Gangster" (which was a great movie) and I was like O_O.

Belgarath · Post by **Belgarath** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:55 pm

Aren't YOU Rambo Stallowned? You beast.

Casey613 · Post by **Casey613** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:11 pm

I thought Sylvester had enough with the lame Rocky movie...

Jstar1 · Post by **Jstar1** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:14 pm

Casey613 wrote:I thought Sylvester had enough with the lame Rocky movie...

no rambo is a cool movie

but if stallone is coming out as rambo in 2008, its a lot like indiana jones with harrison ford whos old enough to be your grandaddy

_Lana_ · Post by **_Lana_** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:21 pm

I want to see it looks cool

XemnasXD · Post by **XemnasXD** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:22 pm

i can't understand Sylvester Stallone.

Zypher · Post by **Zypher** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:25 pm

Casey613 wrote:I thought Sylvester had enough with the lame Rocky movie...

i actually thought it was great

redneck · Post by **redneck** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:28 pm

Zypher wrote:
Casey613 wrote:I thought Sylvester had enough with the lame Rocky movie...

i actually thought it was great

All the Rocky Movies were amazing. And Cobra, and Cliffhanger, And Ramo and all the Other Stalone movies

Silkroad · Post by **Silkroad** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:58 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=allDHk14Nes

Mrs. Santa · Post by **Mrs. Santa** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:07 am

He's getting old. =(

Can't wait to see it.

Casey613 · Post by **Casey613** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:27 am

Silkroad wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=allDHk14Nes

Lol @ the music!
But why must they add exploding boats in every Rambo movie?

HOLLAstir · Post by **HOLLAstir** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:39 am

Sorry Sylvester Stallone's acting is just laughable. Rocky wouldn't have been the same without him so i'll keep him at the first Rocky, but he really didn't need to push his luck by making 5 going on 6, it was overkill. When the trailer was playing in theaters everyone was laughing. Definately a movie I won't be seeing. For now i'm waiting on "Walk Hard." That comes out December 21st.

Stallowned · Post by **Stallowned** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:42 am

Action heroes aren't about acting, they're about being badass.
Sly is badass.
Arnie is badass.
Van Damme is (was) badass.
Chuck is badass.

HOLLAstir · Post by **HOLLAstir** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:49 am

Stallowned wrote:Action heroes aren't about acting, they're about being badass.
Sly is badass.
Arnie is badass.
Van Damme is (was) badass.
Chuck is badass.

Sorry but I look at the overall picture. Everything about movies is acting, so that statement didn't make sense. Haha van damme, steven seagal, chuck norris, all laughable "heroes" if you ask me. Whatever floats your boat though <3

Jstar1 · Post by **Jstar1** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:14 am

HOLLAstir wrote:Sorry Sylvester Stallone's acting is just laughable. Rocky wouldn't have been the same without him so i'll keep him at the first Rocky, but he really didn't need to push his luck by making 5 going on 6, it was overkill. When the trailer was playing in theaters everyone was laughing. Definately a movie I won't be seeing. For now i'm waiting on "Walk Hard." That comes out December 21st.

yeah I hate how our movie directors aren't coming up with new ideas and just trying to get money by making remakes or stupid comic book charecters. Be a little original please

cause king kong, spiderman, batman (seriously how many more batman movies do we need?), indiana jones 4 (lmao 3 is enough and we don't need an old man to do it) are just so terrible regarding originality. All we got now are flashy colors and explosions that keep people interested

shoto · Post by **shoto** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:18 am

actually i haven't seen the other rambo movies

so not too excited

Stallowned · Post by **Stallowned** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:24 am

HOLLAstir wrote:
Stallowned wrote:Action heroes aren't about acting, they're about being badass.
Sly is badass.
Arnie is badass.
Van Damme is (was) badass.
Chuck is badass.

Sorry but I look at the overall picture. Everything about movies is acting, so that statement didn't make sense. Haha van damme, steven seagal, chuck norris, all laughable "heroes" if you ask me. Whatever floats your boat though <3

Well if you look at the overall picture of action hero type films 70s/80s/even early 90s you need a badass and lots of guns. You don't need lots of acting skills to keep a straight face throughotu a whole movie as you gun down legions of men. What you do need is a badass attitude, badass look, and preferrably a jacked frame (no homo)

These days actions films don't have heroes, they always have a bunch of stuff that deviates from the main plot and there's always some chick in there for a bit of romance and sex (which ends up being awkward 90% of the time.)

HOLLAstir · Post by **HOLLAstir** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:27 am

Jstar1 wrote:
HOLLAstir wrote:Sorry Sylvester Stallone's acting is just laughable. Rocky wouldn't have been the same without him so i'll keep him at the first Rocky, but he really didn't need to push his luck by making 5 going on 6, it was overkill. When the trailer was playing in theaters everyone was laughing. Definately a movie I won't be seeing. For now i'm waiting on "Walk Hard." That comes out December 21st.

yeah I hate how our movie directors aren't coming up with new ideas and just trying to get money by making remakes or stupid comic book charecters. Be a little original please

cause king kong, spiderman, batman (seriously how many more batman movies do we need?), indiana jones 4 (lmao 3 is enough and we don't need an old man to do it) are just so terrible regarding originality. All we got now are flashy colors and explosions that keep people interested

I didn't enjoy King Kong, Although I did enjoy the Spiderman series minus the 3rd, too many flaws to rant on and on about. I enjoyed the new Batman movie, and i'm awaiting the new Dark Knight movie to be coming out in 2008. I liked the Indiana Jones series, but yes....unfortionately they are making a new one for 2008 which is just ridiculous, I'm assuming Harrison Ford will be in a wheel chair cruising out of the way of the rolling boulder. So I agree, yet at the same time don't. Some series just don't get old. Take James Bond. How many have they made? A LOT. Yet From Sean Connery to Roger Moore, to Pierce Brosnan and finally to Daniel Craig, it's a series that never gets old. In my opinion.

HOLLAstir · Post by **HOLLAstir** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:32 am

Stallowned wrote:
HOLLAstir wrote:
Stallowned wrote:Action heroes aren't about acting, they're about being badass.
Sly is badass.
Arnie is badass.
Van Damme is (was) badass.
Chuck is badass.

Sorry but I look at the overall picture. Everything about movies is acting, so that statement didn't make sense. Haha van damme, steven seagal, chuck norris, all laughable "heroes" if you ask me. Whatever floats your boat though <3

Well if you look at the overall picture of action hero type films 70s/80s/even early 90s you need a badass and lots of guns. You don't need lots of acting skills to keep a straight face throughotu a whole movie as you gun down legions of men. What you do need is a badass attitude, badass look, and preferrably a jacked frame (no homo)

These days actions films don't have heroes, they always have a bunch of stuff that deviates from the main plot and there's always some chick in there for a bit of romance and sex (which ends up being awkward 90% of the time.)

*sigh* The attitude, and all that comes with the actors portrayal of the character is acting. So them being "badass" is their ability to act "badass" Some pull it off better then others. I think we are thinking of the same concept, just looking at it different ways. I guess in theory to add to your list you could take Terminator to be one of those non "acting" roles that portrays a "badass" character with guns and violence. Some don't really care about how the acting is in an action film. I'm just a little more critical about those small things I suppose.

takolin · Post by **takolin** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:34 am

I haven't seen 1 rambo movie.
I have no intentions to change that.

olivierd · Post by **olivierd** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:16 pm

Seems like stallone is a lot like joymax, MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY

Stallowned · Post by **Stallowned** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:26 pm

olivierd wrote:Seems like stallone is a lot like joymax, MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY

Read in an interview (that I can't find anymore :banghead:

) that he's making the new movie because he felt rambo 2 and 3 were drifting farther and farther away from what he originally wanted.

.//curb · Post by **.//curb** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:44 pm

hell yeah

rambo kicks ass.

heroo · Post by **heroo** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:08 pm

ME ME ME ME ME ME ME

and....

ME !