Attack Rate Increase V.S. Increase Phy Damage

Discuss building Silkroad characters and learning skill trees. Ask for advice and opinions, or help others.
Post Reply

Attack Rate Increase V.S. Increase Phy Damage

Bird "ATT RATE" increase
9
53%
Bird increase "PHY DAMAGE"
8
47%
 
Total votes: 17

User avatar
xMoDx
Valued Member
Posts: 456
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 6:50 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Xian
Contact:

Attack Rate Increase V.S. Increase Phy Damage

Post by xMoDx »

Attack Rate Increase V.S. Increase Phy Damage....




PS: i cant find this post on search so ill just post it,



to admin: if this post is already been posted and feel annoying, moderators feel free to delete this, thanks

User avatar
3DoorsDown
New Member
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:01 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Lietuva

Post by 3DoorsDown »

i think its ATT cuz... bowers needs to be fast..faster dmg...faster kill :P
[59lv blader Bich51/cold20/light51/fire51
Troy nickname: JaMzis_LT

Dark_Force
Regular Member
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:34 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Alexander

Post by Dark_Force »

blue hawk ftw :wink:
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>

Sekkaigan

Post by Sekkaigan »

well i would go phys because looks are EVERYTHING :P

User avatar
xMoDx
Valued Member
Posts: 456
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 6:50 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Xian
Contact:

Post by xMoDx »

hmmmm but technically which would be advisable for pvp and pve? phy dmg for pvp and attrate for pve? yes? no? :?

User avatar
glavie
Frequent Member
Posts: 1195
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 4:17 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Aege

Post by glavie »

Depends on your weapon.

Good weapon you want blue hawk to take advantage of weapon.

Crappy weapon you want an independent damage increase.



I don't think anyone has actually tested it though :( so I can't say 100% sure.
lvl 65 4gap 84:84 bow inactive.
GOLD GUIDE Just Read It

User avatar
tomiotar
Active Member
Posts: 598
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 3:56 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Tibet

Post by tomiotar »

I would suggest lightning for pve and blue for pvp because against a good defence (player defence) the bird damage is too low, but it can be usefull against mobs that have lower defence and maybe save 1 arrow.


PS: I use just blue and didnt farm the lighting.
Image
Image Latest addition
Now that I kill them all I can rest in peace ^^

User avatar
xMoDx
Valued Member
Posts: 456
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 6:50 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Xian
Contact:

Post by xMoDx »

if going with attack rate for pvp and your opponent has high parry it will null the damage and makes the blue hawk useless... right? so if using increase physical its a positive damage? correct me if im wrong.....

User avatar
elnawawi
Regular Member
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:22 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Venus

Post by elnawawi »

tomiotar wrote:I would suggest lightning for pve and blue for pvp because against a good defence (player defence) the bird damage is too low, but it can be usefull against mobs that have lower defence and maybe save 1 arrow.




if going with attack rate for pvp and your opponent has high parry it will null the damage and makes the blue hawk useless... right? so if using increase physical its a positive damage? correct me if im wrong.....


Both are right
Zanthra / lvl 9X Bard/Wizard / venus

User avatar
glavie
Frequent Member
Posts: 1195
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 4:17 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Aege

Post by glavie »

xMoDx wrote:if going with attack rate for pvp and your opponent has high parry it will null the damage and makes the blue hawk useless... right? so if using increase physical its a positive damage? correct me if im wrong.....


If your opponent has high parry it will just balance things. Its not useless, you will still hit harder more often then if you werent using any bird.

Anyone have the lighting bird?
lvl 65 4gap 84:84 bow inactive.
GOLD GUIDE Just Read It

lynette
Casual Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:47 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Athens

Post by lynette »

hmmm, i think attk rating will be much better for pvp,
whereas when farming, use the phy damage hawk.

Main reason i think that the phy damage dealt on human players is not going to be significant , there will be damage, but not significant
compared to when you use attk rating, there is higher chances for u to do your max range of damage ( is there higher chance to deal status too? i m not sure, but it seems does, need confirmation though) , and , that, is significant damage.

User avatar
tomiotar
Active Member
Posts: 598
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 3:56 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Tibet

Post by tomiotar »

glavie wrote:
xMoDx wrote:if going with attack rate for pvp and your opponent has high parry it will null the damage and makes the blue hawk useless... right? so if using increase physical its a positive damage? correct me if im wrong.....


If your opponent has high parry it will just balance things. Its not useless, you will still hit harder more often then if you werent using any bird.

Anyone have the lighting bird?



I dont have it but Ive fought people that have it and it did on me like 100 dmg and didnt hit really often :roll: .
Image
Image Latest addition
Now that I kill them all I can rest in peace ^^

lynette
Casual Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:47 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Athens

Post by lynette »

ya....thats y i think attk rating is better from what i stated above

Post Reply

Return to “Characters and Skills”