rouge or warrior?

[noobert mclagg]

I hav a rouge and I dont really like it that much. I know they get a lot better a lvl 40 but I think a warrior would be more fun and better. Plz leave reason for your choice.

[Nitro]

2handed warrior ftw XD
Good Dmg but lower than rogue .....
Has knockdown , knockback and stun ....
Looks awesome

Great Defense (has iron (+700 phy def.) and mana (+1k mag def.)
skin buffs (last for 45 seconds) ... [You mix it with bless and you
got 1.30 seconds of god mode and chain again after 30 seconds)

Can kill everything in pvp

[akuji^]

Take 2h warrior because you cant even spell Rogue.

[mike456]

then would warrior be good for a hunter?

[Nitro]

then would warrior be good for a hunter?

They look good

@akuji ... is that name from psx game ... Akuji The Heartless?

[ciddy]

Take 2h warrior because you cant even spell Rogue.

i agree lol

[noobert mclagg]

what about s/s warrior with warlock sub

[X20AFreedom]

s/s warrior u shuld forget it its really hard to play.i got a lvl 23 s/s warrior im fightning crabs it took me 3 hits to kill those crabs normal ones. slash , shield crush,stab. i did these to kill every monster. i saw 2 handed warrior 2 hits them.its really sad.

u cant kill a person but u really look cool with those shield.
but u might kill rogue or wiz but rogue and wiz its depend on luck

[nphillip]

but I think a warrior would be more fun and better.

u think? cause i dont think so

[XCaosX]

Take 2h warrior because you cant even spell Rogue.

hahahahaa
go warrior coolest euro char*_* armor rox

[corkscrew]

warrior ftw

[noobert mclagg]

s/s is really hard to play but with warlock debuffs wouldnt it make it easier to kill

[rumpleKillskin]

s/s is really hard to play but with warlock debuffs wouldnt it make it easier to kill

wo ho ho, where did you get that idea??
lol

*cough*VforVendetta*cough*

[XemnasXD]

^ because V invented the Warrior/Warlock -_-

OT: imo 2H warrior isn't that exciting, you might as well go be a Glaiver and skip the pot delay, so with axes or 1H(greatest tank)

[MasterKojito]

Take 2h warrior because you cant even spell Rogue.

Hypocrisy much?

[Nitro]

^ because V invented the Warrior/Warlock -_-

OT: imo 2H warrior isn't that exciting, you might as well go be a Glaiver and skip the pot delay, so with axes or 1H(greatest tank)

Axes sux at tanking ... and did you even play 2H?

[GEF_Slayer]

im going to try a 1h/cleric, in theory it should be an excelent support/tank build. good for uniques, and tanking is such a good feeling

[noobert mclagg]

as I was looking at the 1h sword moves and one said you can use this skill while the person is kd. So does 1h sword hav a kd move because I didnt see one on there.

[binnosh]

1h hasn't got kd skill

only the 2h skills have it

[Jstar1]

^ because V invented the Warrior/Warlock -_-

OT: imo 2H warrior isn't that exciting, you might as well go be a Glaiver and skip the pot delay, so with axes or 1H(greatest tank)

+1 pot delay can get annoying

but 2H does look nice, 2hand sword looks good

and you will almost always be accepted into parties since you are a tanker (provided that you do your job)

[XemnasXD]

^ because V invented the Warrior/Warlock -_-

OT: imo 2H warrior isn't that exciting, you might as well go be a Glaiver and skip the pot delay, so with axes or 1H(greatest tank)

Axes sux at tanking ... and did you even play 2H?

actually i have so take a minute and feel stupid....



done yet?


anyway i was calling 1H the greatest tank not axes and it is so that not even debatable, good forbid 1H warrior has a warlock or Cleric sub then your in for a fight.....And i like the way axes reminded me of my rogue + those axe moves look amazing so IMO (in case you missed it the first time) Axes or 1H warrior would be more fun to play.....

[noobert mclagg]

thanks guys I think im going 1h warrior/warlock