Debate! Capitalism
- [SD]Frites
- Active Member
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:51 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
- non ego man
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 2699
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:26 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Why I gotta do this???
-
JacksColon
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:56 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Rome
quote]
Proletariat = good
Private ownership = bad
Just saved you 2 hours, 59 minutes and 53 seconds of BS.[/quote]
Wow, that is probably the most simplified and absurd statement regarding to Marxism I have ever heard/read.
What about "Greed is Good" for capitalism? lame
Proletariat = good
Private ownership = bad
Just saved you 2 hours, 59 minutes and 53 seconds of BS.[/quote]
Wow, that is probably the most simplified and absurd statement regarding to Marxism I have ever heard/read.
What about "Greed is Good" for capitalism? lame
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J
- dom
- Global Moderator

- Posts: 9962
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:46 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: västkustskt
sirdingydang wrote:
Proletariat = good
Private ownership = bad
Just saved you 2 hours, 59 minutes and 53 seconds of BS.
Wow, that is probably the most simplified and absurd statement regarding to Marxism I have ever heard/read.
What about "Greed is Good" for capitalism? lame
+1.
Assuming that I don't understand the basic ideas of marxism is insulting. Please don't patronize me.

-
JacksColon
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:56 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Rome
- non ego man
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 2699
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:26 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Why I gotta do this???
dom wrote:Assuming that I don't understand the basic ideas of marxism is insulting. Please don't patronize me.
You want patronizing? How about this: why don't you go and rest a bit sweetie, because you're getting a little worked up over what was nothing more than little joke. I "assum[ed] you don't understand the basic ideas of Marxism..."? What I actually assumed was that you were intelligent enough to realize this was more a comment about my feelings of the limits of Marxist intellectual thought than an assumption about your own knowledge. My apologies...won't make that mistake again.
There. That's patronizing.
- dom
- Global Moderator

- Posts: 9962
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:46 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: västkustskt
non ego man wrote:dom wrote:Assuming that I don't understand the basic ideas of marxism is insulting. Please don't patronize me.
You want patronizing? How about this: why don't you go and rest a bit sweetie, because you're getting a little worked up over what was nothing more than little joke. I "assum[ed] you don't understand the basic ideas of Marxism..."? What I actually assumed was that you were intelligent enough to realize this was more a comment about my feelings of the limits of Marxist intellectual thought than an assumption about your own knowledge. My apologies...won't make that mistake again.
There. That's patronizing.
The mistake you made was attempting a poor joke. When you try to humour someone, make sure it's about something worth laughing about. You failed at making a joke, and as such it could not be taken as one.

- non ego man
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 2699
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:26 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Why I gotta do this???
dom wrote:You failed at making a joke, and as such it could not be taken as one.
It can't have been a joke because I didn't think it was funny so it must be a personal attack on me for my lack of knowledge about Marxism?
*note to self: don't joke with dom*
Last edited by non ego man on Tue Oct 30, 2007 8:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- dom
- Global Moderator

- Posts: 9962
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:46 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: västkustskt
non ego man wrote:dom wrote:You failed at making a joke, and as such it could not be taken as one.
It can't have been a joke because I didn't think it was funny so it must be a personal attack on me for my lack of knowledge about Marxism?
*note to self: don't joke with dom*
The joke is insulting because of it's content, and it's content is not justified because the joke was not funny.

- non ego man
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 2699
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:26 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Why I gotta do this???
Look, there's a long tradition of humor reducing a complex idea to (over)simplified basics using the "X = good, Y = bad" framework. It is meant to be silly but contain a kernel of truth.
I'm sorry you took my silly statement to be "insulting" and "patronizing" but your response is "oversensitive" and "irrational."
I'm sorry you took my silly statement to be "insulting" and "patronizing" but your response is "oversensitive" and "irrational."
-
JacksColon
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:56 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Rome
- non ego man
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 2699
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:26 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Why I gotta do this???