I mean, I've seen higher level fights, and rogue doesn't do very good.
Also, in parties, when I'm acting as the bard, I'll always attack in my off time from healing, and there was this one level 23 rogue, I was level 22 at the time, and she had on dagger desperate, all buffs with poisoning on too (I know it doesn't add any more damage, but whatever) using her strongest attack, and my bard still hit higher than her.
Bards aren't exactly the kings of damage either, not to mention they don't have any attack buffs until level 30.
So... Why does everyone insist that rogues are so good?
If you're talking about pvp, I think this is how it goes: 1 hand sword, 2 hand sword, wizard, cleric (these can ultimately be the best I think, but I'm not sure yet so I'll place them here), crossbow (these guys get better in later levels, but it pretty much has to do entirely with range), dual axes, bard (buffs ftw
Be super duper honest, how good do you really think rogues are, in your own experience.
Don't be like "omfg on csro tey sai dey pwn". Ok, csro has some pretty crazy players... So many of them are 1:1 hybrids, and by isro standards that's pretty weird. So, why should you listen to them about rogues? I think the whole manual potting thing changes their perspective on alot of stuff.
If you can hit someone 2 or 3 times before they realize you're there, that build is good in csro.
Discuss.
P.S. WTF is with people always calling rogues rouges? It's not a red french guy, it's a rogue... ROGUE.












