Warrior is not for Rogue!

[zeldazoo22]

Ok, let me EXPLAIN! Most people will get all the skills in Rogue to start I presume, or at least thats what I'm doing, and therefore leaves the mwith two weapons. The Crossbow for range and the daggers for melee. Now, WHY on earth would someone choose warrior as a sub-class? That leaves you with three weapons! Now, all your dagger skills were a waste!

[pengachu]

unless they decide only to get the buffs...but i also find it confusing and not making any sense

[Biscuit]

[...]

Now, WHY on earth would someone choose warrior as a sub-class?

[...]

Because you might have a hard time getting and keeping monsters attention if you try to tank with a rogue.

[Vandall]

[...]

Now, WHY on earth would someone choose warrior as a sub-class?

[...]

Because you might have a hard time getting and keeping monsters attention if you try to tank with a rogue.

+1

[zeldazoo22]

Theres plenty of monsters to kill so I don't think I need to be warried about that. If I shoot the guy with a crossbow, they run too me but oops! I turn invisible...now, I stab them with posion dagger....DEAD. What have u got to say to that?! huh? huh?

[LAki]

I think he was talking about your role in the party.
You cant pull monsters, then turn invisible and let the monsters you pulled kill rest of the party.

[Biscuit]

Theres plenty of monsters to kill so I don't think I need to be warried about that. If I shoot the guy with a crossbow, they run too me but oops! I turn invisible...now, I stab them with posion dagger....DEAD. What have u got to say to that?! huh? huh?

Have you actually tried that strategy?