One step for ManKind, One giant leap for privacy laws.

Crumpets · Post by **Crumpets** » Thu May 31, 2007 10:44 pm

Friend found this ..

I mean what gives. Technologies is great yeah, but for anyone in the world to zoom up to your god damn number plae .. or your face?

http://www.shoutwire.com/viewstory/7114 ... on_Streets

Thank god it's limited for now to that area, and it's not live .. but it's updated frequently .... God damn them.

MastaChiefX · Post by **MastaChiefX** » Thu May 31, 2007 10:46 pm

Lol thats crazy.

Big brother is becoming realer by the day.

Zypher · Post by **Zypher** » Thu May 31, 2007 10:51 pm

looks like i cant do my business outside anymore.

StealMySoda · Post by **StealMySoda** » Thu May 31, 2007 10:59 pm

1984 *spooky sci-fi music*

Silver0 · Post by **Silver0** » Thu May 31, 2007 11:22 pm

Well What A Nice Map For A Criminal To Use

Found My House
And My Sis BF's car Parked Outside xD

LuV3r8o1 · Post by **LuV3r8o1** » Thu May 31, 2007 11:29 pm

Crumpets wrote:Thank god it's limited for now to that area, and it's not live .. but it's updated frequently .... God damn them.

Just how often is it updated?

[SD]Master_Wong · Post by **[SD]Master_Wong** » Thu May 31, 2007 11:35 pm

lol we get filmed on cctv like 300 times a day so who cares about google doing it aswel?

Vandall · Post by **Vandall** » Thu May 31, 2007 11:53 pm

StealMySoda wrote:1984 *spooky sci-fi music*

i loled, prob cause i just read it this year 4 school (yes i ACTUALLY read the book)

XemnasXD · Post by **XemnasXD** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:05 am

don't you have to sign a release or something saying they can use your photo

Crumpets · Post by **Crumpets** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:18 am

[SD]Master_Wong wrote:lol we get filmed on cctv like 300 times a day so who cares about google doing it aswel?

Seeing as anyone in the world with a PC will be able to check up on ANYONE in the world soon ... Yeah it's concerning. Alltho for now it's still 'Fun'

@LuV3r8o1 ... I think atm It's like in beta so once a week orso.

Reise · Post by **Reise** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 am

I'm sure there's nothing on Google Earth our gov't wouldn't want the public to see. And I'm sure they've been able to do this (with much much more detail) for years now.

IguanaRampage · Post by **IguanaRampage** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:52 am

MastaChiefX wrote:Lol thats crazy.

Big brother is becoming realer by the day.

+1

shadowman20875 · Post by **shadowman20875** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:26 am

that just makes my job so much easier :twisted:

Sefris · Post by **Sefris** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:38 am

I think this is a great actually ^.^ I love it when something new like this comes up and still "wows" me. For all of you concerned, don't be. If someone really wanted to do something bad to you they would. They didn't need google before and they don't need it now.

fena · Post by **fena** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:54 am

Wait...
This stuff isn't in real time, though, right? It's still frames, taken a long time ago... so you can't REALLY spy on someone. Unless someone was dancing naked in front of their door the second the frame was taken.

Then they'd be in trouble.

Youtubeee.

Sharp324 · Post by **Sharp324** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:57 am

Actually the US government made them remove their airforce bases from their ressed in area due to security matters. For most bases anyway.

takolin · Post by **takolin** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:06 am

I found my house.
Can one spy the Pentagon?

Orilana · Post by **Orilana** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:01 pm

LuV3r8o1 wrote:
Crumpets wrote:Thank god it's limited for now to that area, and it's not live .. but it's updated frequently .... God damn them.

Just how often is it updated?

Not been updated in over a year. They're just images from Google Earth. They sent a satellite up to photograph the earth in that way over the space of a few months.

I see the same images for places I've lived in as they were a year ago. Some of these were in central London.

If they updated it frequently, they'd update the cities first I think so don't panic.

It was a one off which may be updated once things start going out of date.

Orilana · Post by **Orilana** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:05 pm

XemnasXD wrote:don't you have to sign a release or something saying they can use your photo

Nope. Anything out in the public is just that...public. Photographers only have to get model releases signed when photographs are taken on private premises.

You could stand outside any US Airforce Base and take pics of anything as long as you are using a normal lens and not some super zoom spy one. As long as you are standing on public property, nothing is illegal although the Governement would like to have you believe different.

Website · Post by **satman83** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:13 pm

Orilana wrote:
XemnasXD wrote:don't you have to sign a release or something saying they can use your photo

Nope. Anything out in the public is just that...public. Photographers only have to get model releases signed when photographs are taken on private premises.

so... i could use pics of a say...someone drunk at one of those theme
school disco nights?

[SD]Master_Wong · Post by **[SD]Master_Wong** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:17 pm

Orilana wrote:
LuV3r8o1 wrote:
Crumpets wrote:Thank god it's limited for now to that area, and it's not live .. but it's updated frequently .... God damn them.

Just how often is it updated?

Not been updated in over a year. They're just images from Google Earth. They sent a satellite up to photograph the earth in that way over the space of a few months.

I see the same images for places I've lived in as they were a year ago. Some of these were in central London.

If they updated it frequently, they'd update the cities first I think so don't panic.

It was a one off which may be updated once things start going out of date.

they have updated google earth but the images are stil very old

Orilana · Post by **Orilana** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:58 pm

satman83 wrote:
Orilana wrote:
XemnasXD wrote:don't you have to sign a release or something saying they can use your photo

Nope. Anything out in the public is just that...public. Photographers only have to get model releases signed when photographs are taken on private premises.

so... i could use pics of a say...someone drunk at one of those theme
school disco nights?

Yup

Post by **Stress** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 8:13 pm

This is more then worrying to me. not fun at all.

Website · Post by **satman83** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:06 pm

Orilana wrote:
satman83 wrote:
Orilana wrote:
XemnasXD wrote:don't you have to sign a release or something saying they can use your photo

Nope. Anything out in the public is just that...public. Photographers only have to get model releases signed when photographs are taken on private premises.

so... i could use pics of a say...someone drunk at one of those theme
school disco nights?

Yup

lol....well guess its posted time :twisted:

........lol jk jk i wouldnt do that
to my firend...a firens that should go on msn

takolin · Post by **takolin** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:16 pm

satman83 wrote:
Orilana wrote:
satman83 wrote:
Orilana wrote:
XemnasXD wrote:don't you have to sign a release or something saying they can use your photo

Nope. Anything out in the public is just that...public. Photographers only have to get model releases signed when photographs are taken on private premises.

so... i could use pics of a say...someone drunk at one of those theme
school disco nights?

Yup

lol....well guess its posted time ........lol jk jk i wouldnt do that
to my firend...a firens that should go on msn

If you publicise it you might get sued for harassment?
But I'm not sure.

Silkroad Online Forums

One step for ManKind, One giant leap for privacy laws.

One step for ManKind, One giant leap for privacy laws.

Re: One step for ManKind, One giant leap for privacy laws.

Re: One step for ManKind, One giant leap for privacy laws.

Re: One step for ManKind, One giant leap for privacy laws.