Silkroad Online WEBMASTER is a retard

Promet · Post by **Promet** » Mon May 21, 2007 2:36 am

<<< 550 No inbox for <abuse@silkroadonline.net>.

so where do our reports supposed to go?? BOT allowed FTW??

Code: Select all

Your domain does not have an SPF record. This means that spammers can easily send out E-mail that looks like it came from your domain, which can make your domain look bad (if the recipient thinks you really sent it), and can cost you money (when people complain to you, rather than the spammer). You may want to add an SPF record ASAP, as 01 Oct 2004 was the target date for domains to have SPF records in place (Hotmail, for example, started checking SPF records on 01 Oct 2004).

useless ingame global to prevent users from getting hacked...... they must secure there systems first.....

Code: Select all

ERROR: One or more of your mailservers does not accept mail from "<>". Mailservers are required by RFC1123 5.2.9 to accept mail from "<>". By refusing this mail, you will never get reject/bounce messages, or return receipts, and you may get other mail server admins upset at you if they have to deal with your bounce messages.

ERROR: mail.joymax.co.kr's MAILFROM <> response: 501 bad sender address expression. .

maybe the reason why they are that very busy?? :banghead:

Code: Select all

WARNING: One or more of your mailservers is claiming to be a host other than what it really is (the SMTP greeting should be a 3-digit code, followed by a space or a dash, then the host name). If your mailserver sends out E-mail using this domain in its EHLO or HELO, your E-mail might get blocked by anti-spam software. This is also a technical violation of RFC821 4.3 (and RFC2821 4.3.1). Note that the hostname given in the SMTP greeting should have an A record pointing back to the same server. Note that this one test may use a cached DNS record.

mail.joymax.co.kr claims to be host joymax.com [but A lookup times out]: 
220 joymax.com SMTP G-Mail.Net v4.8 Free , Service Ready

this is easy to fix.....

Code: Select all

ERROR: Your SOA (Start of Authority) record states that your master (primary) name server is: jmx_web1.. However, that is not a valid domain name!

jmx_web1? lol.. looks like the webmaster's first project at school is joymax website...

Code: Select all

FAIL: You have one or more missing (stealth) nameservers. The following nameserver(s) are listed (at your nameservers) as nameservers for your domain, but are not listed at the parent nameservers (therefore, they may or may not get used, depending on whether your DNS servers return them in the authority section for other requests, per RFC2181 5.4.1). You need to make sure that these stealth nameservers are working; if they are not responding, you may have serious problems! The DNS Report will not query these servers, so you need to be very careful that they are working properly.

jmx_web1.
This is listed as an ERROR because there are some cases where nasty problems can occur (if the TTLs vary from the NS records at the root servers and the NS records point to your own domain, for example).

Missing (stealth) nameservers

StealMySoda · Post by **StealMySoda** » Mon May 21, 2007 2:45 am

Wow.thats pretty retarded.

cin · Post by **cin** » Mon May 21, 2007 2:48 am

lawl >_<

TibusOfVenice · Post by **TibusOfVenice** » Mon May 21, 2007 5:38 am

no clue what any of this means so i'm going to nod my head and smile.

Blurred · Post by **Blurred** » Mon May 21, 2007 5:53 am

wow... Good job JM

bigmachini · Post by **bigmachini** » Mon May 21, 2007 5:57 am

i don't get it

Promet · Post by **Promet** » Mon May 21, 2007 6:48 am

bigmachini wrote:i don't get it

it means they dont follow and they are not valid W3C compliant....

Programers/Webmasters look at them as NOOBS because they cant do there site the correct way... and may cause account hack due to bugged codes.... unsafe practice that is.....

Death2U · Post by **Death2U** » Mon May 21, 2007 7:32 am

They probably hired some kid off the street for the administration of their DNS and mail server.

Penguin13 · Post by **Penguin13** » Mon May 21, 2007 7:34 am

I've said it a million times before. They hired German programmers/coders to translate a Korean game into English. Well, that's MY theory at least >.>

Vandango · Post by **Vandango** » Mon May 21, 2007 10:17 am

Lawl
this is what SRF got

Code: Select all

Your domain does not have an SPF record. This means that spammers can easily send out E-mail that looks like it came from your domain, which can make your domain look bad (if the recipient thinks you really sent it), and can cost you money (when people complain to you, rather than the spammer). You may want to add an SPF record ASAP, as 01 Oct 2004 was the target date for domains to have SPF records in place (Hotmail, for example, started checking SPF records on 01 Oct 2004).

and this was just a warning

MonstaH · Post by **MonstaH** » Mon May 21, 2007 10:57 am

Dimitri13 wrote:I've said it a million times before. They hired German programmers/coders to translate a Korean game into English. Well, that's MY theory at least >.>

If they had done that, this game would be excellent, believe me :roll:

It were rather some Hawaiians

xMoDx · Post by **xMoDx** » Tue May 22, 2007 12:46 am

MonstaH wrote:
Dimitri13 wrote:I've said it a million times before. They hired German programmers/coders to translate a Korean game into English. Well, that's MY theory at least >.>

If they had done that, this game would be excellent, believe me It were rather some Hawaiians

whats with hawaiians?? :shock:

Matrixman__ · Post by **Matrixman__** » Tue May 22, 2007 1:57 am

TibusOfVenice wrote:no clue what any of this means so i'm going to nod my head and smile.

+1

fena · Post by **fena** » Tue May 22, 2007 2:20 am

TibusOfVenice wrote:no clue what any of this means so i'm going to nod my head and smile.

+1

PureOwnage · Post by **PureOwnage** » Tue May 22, 2007 3:52 am

Ya good thinking einstein, post their vunerabilities on a public forum so some script kiddie can go mess with the site. You sir are an idiot!

(sarcasm... or is it! o.O)

Post by **Rainigul** » Tue May 22, 2007 4:10 am

TibusOfVenice wrote:no clue what any of this means so i'm going to nod my head and smile.

+3

MrJoey · Post by **MrJoey** » Tue May 22, 2007 4:17 am

PureOwnage wrote:Ya good thinking einstein, post their vunerabilities on a public forum so some script kiddie can go mess with the site. You sir are an idiot! (sarcasm... or is it! o.O)

That information is publicly available anyways. If you're upset at anyone, it should be that site for existing.

PureOwnage · Post by **PureOwnage** » Tue May 22, 2007 4:19 am

MrJoey wrote:
PureOwnage wrote:Ya good thinking einstein, post their vunerabilities on a public forum so some script kiddie can go mess with the site. You sir are an idiot! (sarcasm... or is it! o.O)

That information is publicly available anyways. If you're upset at anyone, it should be that site for existing.

Ya guess you are right XD

BrokenSaint · Post by **BrokenSaint** » Tue May 22, 2007 4:58 am

Posting Spree ftw?

PureOwnage · Post by **PureOwnage** » Tue May 22, 2007 5:04 am

SPREE FTW! lol I desever e-cookies!... (dammit now I want munchies! DAM WEED!)

BrokenSaint · Post by **BrokenSaint** » Tue May 22, 2007 5:06 am

How many spacecakes did you have... >_> lol

PureOwnage · Post by **PureOwnage** » Tue May 22, 2007 5:16 am

um I smoked 1/3 an ounce of chron -.-

SuicideGrl · Post by **SuicideGrl** » Tue May 22, 2007 5:19 am

it's no easy task being W3C compliant. most of the time it takes 2x the code to fix things that those validators catch, and 9/10 times the so-called failures don't affect usability anyway. i usualyl do what i can to make the sites i design comply, but sometimes i can't be bothered.

i should add an additional fee for making all sites i design compliant lol.

BrokenSaint · Post by **BrokenSaint** » Tue May 22, 2007 5:26 am

Nice avatar Sui. :O

Don't know if this is on-topic or not but here goes:

Anyways, if they're worried about the security and functionality of ther website they should actually do something about it instead of racking in money, but not putting it to any use, LIKE HIRING A GOOD WEBMASTER. lol

Not sure exactly when, but back in it's early days their website was so insecure that you could become a GM, all you had to do was to inject an SQL code and your done.

Promet · Post by **Promet** » Tue May 22, 2007 8:02 am

joymax security had been breached before..... they must know there lesson.... if they LOVE there customers/gamers they must do some extra effort to protect its players and silkbuyers......

BrokenSaint wrote:
Anyways, if they're worried about the security and functionality of ther website they should actually do something about it instead of racking in money, but not putting it to any use, LIKE HIRING A GOOD WEBMASTER. lol

Not sure exactly when, but back in it's early days their website was so insecure that you could become a GM, all you had to do was to inject an SQL code and your done.

SQL injection FTL....

Due to poor Website Maintenance... this can happen again... and again....