Two of a kind?

Key-J · Post by **Key-J** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:00 am

We all know the huge and mighty king of all dinosaurs, the most ferocious, meat eating killer of the dinosaur world. The Tyrannosaurus Rex, more commonly known as the T-Rex.

We also know that lovable, small cute and cuddly giver of food. The Chicken.

Two popular an unique animals, both completely different in nature… or so we thought. As recent findings have shown that there is likely possiblity that the chicken is a descendant of the T-Rex.

BBC News wrote:Protein extracted from 68 million-year-old T. rex bones has shed new light on the evolutionary link between dinosaurs and birds.

Researchers compared organic molecules preserved in the T. rex fossils with those of living animals, and found they were similar to chicken protein.

Well, thats conforting isnt it? Even if the resemblence might not be immediatly obviouse. It's there...

So just think, if you have a pet chickent. Thats Billions of years of preditoral history, locked away in the DNA of this little bird... Which could be released at any time....

If you want to read more, click me

Zypher · Post by **Zypher** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:06 am

this prob doesnt have anything to dowith the topic at hand, but when i was in 1st grade i told everyone i had a pet whale in my basement

lol i so sweet

and ive heard about the whole trx thing on tv i believe

BlackFox · Post by **BlackFox** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:30 am

Key-J wrote:
We also know that lovable, small cute and cuddly giver of food. The Chicken.

So just think, if you have a pet chickent. Thats Billions of years of preditoral history, locked away in the DNA of this little bird...

o.O scary so watch out so chicken dont chase you and whant eat you instead ..

or the chicken dont becomes be a Rex before your eyes..Key-J

[SD]Master_Wong · Post by **[SD]Master_Wong** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:36 am

BlackFox wrote:
Key-J wrote:
We also know that lovable, small cute and cuddly giver of food. The Chicken.

So just think, if you have a pet chickent. Thats Billions of years of preditoral history, locked away in the DNA of this little bird...

o.O scary so watch out so chicken dont chase you and whant eat you instead .. or the chicken dont becomes be a Rex before your eyes..Key-J

chicken digivolve to T-rex :twisted:

RuYi · Post by **RuYi** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:37 am

.........Shit.

We got two chickens.

Key-J · Post by **Key-J** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:39 am

Hehehehe, i was waiting for you to post RuYi

RuYi · Post by **RuYi** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:41 am

T-T Oh yeah just laugh at my misery!

I'm heading to the bunker.

Key-J · Post by **Key-J** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:57 am

Soz, but when i read this. It just had you written all over it

Their comming to get your RuYi... :twisted:

Now you know what goes, "bump" in the night :wink:

RuYi · Post by **RuYi** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:07 pm

......Maybe our chickens aren't like that?

Didn't the news say anything about some certain chickens not being related to t-rex?

BlackFox · Post by **BlackFox** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:57 pm

RuYi wrote:......Maybe our chickens aren't like that?

Didn't the news say anything about some certain chickens not being related to t-rex?

Never know :twisted:

Can be a invasion of chickens Rex And they chase you to RuYi ... So Run!!

Pan_Raider(`_´) · Post by **Pan_Raider(`_´)** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:50 pm

China is in trouble if a new virus makes chickens evolve back to dinosaurs :roll:

Anyway, that is true cos birds evolved from them scaly creatures, and we used to be fish.

Website · Post by **satman83** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 2:44 pm

I also saw and watched a TV show that said dinosaurs....had feathers?

WTF yes you heard me right feathers.

heres a pic

its how people think that actually used to look like

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1081677.stm

it was a discovery TV show, but that was the only link i had...lol it had
a pic of a T-Rex in feathers...so funny

Bakemaster · Post by **Bakemaster** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:14 pm

Human DNA is more than a 99% match for a dog's DNA. It's all relative. Pun intended.

Website · Post by **satman83** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:25 pm

acutally...were 98% monkey...and 2% banana :shock:

lol no its true...but i mean its just stupid, we all evolved on this planet
and as such share DnA with every lving organism

Isis · Post by **Isis** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:31 pm

I watched a program about Velociraptors. They only stood to about 2ft tall, not like in Jurassic Park where they stood to about 6ft tall..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velociraptor

Post by **dom** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:33 pm

Both are old news, the feathers and the birds. However, if I remember correctly, the widespread featherage only came before or after the period of the "typical" dinosaur, so the pictures we see are somewhat accurate.

Website · Post by **satman83** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:41 pm

Bastet wrote:I watched a program about Velociraptors. They only stood to about 2ft tall, not like in Jurassic Park where they stood to about 6ft tall..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velociraptor

you sure there raptors..and wikipedia?? lol not reliable at all also even in
that it says that there 2ft tall at the hip. i mean am 3ft tall at my
hip, doesnt mean thats my height :roll:

. Also the person who posted
that up posted a pic of a Sinornithosaurus (a small feathered dinosaur)

seriously anyone can make a section on wiki...its about as reliable a
academic source as giving your baby to micheal jackson, while hes standing
on a balcony and telling him to look after it :roll:

Isis · Post by **Isis** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:46 pm

satman83 wrote:
Bastet wrote:I watched a program about Velociraptors. They only stood to about 2ft tall, not like in Jurassic Park where they stood to about 6ft tall..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velociraptor

you sure there raptors..and wikipedia?? lol not reliable at all also even in
that it says that there 2ft tall at the hip. i mean am 3ft tall at my
hip, doesnt mean thats my height . Also the person who posted
that up posted a pic of a Sinornithosaurus (a small feathered dinosaur)

seriously anyone can make a section on wiki...its about as reliable a
academic source as giving your baby to micheal jackson, while hes standing
on a balcony and telling him to look after it

Yeah read what I said... I watched a program about Velociraptors on TV.. And basically they made them 6ft tall in Jurrasic park to make them look scary. It wouldn't look fun if they had a 2-3ft tall dinosaur running around..

Website · Post by **satman83** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:58 pm

but there not 2tf tall...only 2ft at their hip height which is what it says
in that link....but then goes on to contridict itself :roll:

whats happend is that the person who copyed and pasted this stuff from
other source coundlt read or understand the "2ft tall at hip" and so
just went a got a pic of a small dinosaur....this is one of the reason
why wikipedia is a joke and only fools think its reliable..i mean so what
if its the first result in a search?? i mean whats wrong with encharter
or britannic?

.

and in Jurrasic park their not 6ft tall, their acutally small compared to
the humans...maybe only 4 to 4.5ft tall when crouched over. But in truth
from what i can find the size varis from 3ft at the hips to 4ft. people dont
realise that "at the hips" means the animals hips...as most bipedal
dinosurs hips were normally only a few feet lower then there overall
height.
Also i mean look at the T-Rex, only 5 know full skelotons and each
one has a different height

Isis · Post by **Isis** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:17 pm

You make me laugh..

Website · Post by **satman83** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:35 pm

i make a lot of people laugh

Silkroad Online Forums

Two of a kind?

Two of a kind?

Re: Two of a kind?

Re: Two of a kind?