CrimsonNuker wrote:Ill carry one of these bitches later on in my life lmao
Lol crazy old guys with sword canes ftw!
Eukanuba wrote:At this point we're just having good, clean fun with eachother.

Bakemaster wrote:OMG you spoilt it I'm not playing anymore!
Bakemaster wrote:You: "Japanophilia (along with things like Bruce Lee worship and gangsta' culture) is a result of lacking good taste."
Your response there is what's making the implication (P --> Q), in the greater context of our BATTLE TO THE DEATH here. The quote was merely for reference and wasn't meant to indicate that the fallacy was in that very sentence.
Lance wrote:LOL, cna yuo nerds stop arguing on my topic about swords.
On 21 Mar 2007, MURDERER wrote:WRITING IN CAPS ARE NOT A THREAT TO ANYONE UNLESS IT IS WRITEN IN THREATS WITH PERVASIVE LANGUAGE.

Eukanuba wrote:Thus, "Japanophilia (...) is a result of lacking good taste." does not mean "If one lacks good taste, then he/she is a Japanophile."
Bakemaster wrote:Eukanuba wrote:Thus, "Japanophilia (...) is a result of lacking good taste." does not mean "If one lacks good taste, then he/she is a Japanophile."
Obviously. The sentence on its own is perfectly fine. Hence implication instead of statement, hence my use of the qualifier phrase, "in the greater context of our BATTLE TO THE DEATH here."
On 21 Mar 2007, MURDERER wrote:WRITING IN CAPS ARE NOT A THREAT TO ANYONE UNLESS IT IS WRITEN IN THREATS WITH PERVASIVE LANGUAGE.

Bakemaster wrote:I approve of the stylish manner in which you admit defeat, Eukanuba, as well as the source material.
On 21 Mar 2007, MURDERER wrote:WRITING IN CAPS ARE NOT A THREAT TO ANYONE UNLESS IT IS WRITEN IN THREATS WITH PERVASIVE LANGUAGE.
