Joymax "considering" banning bots...

A place for general discussion about Silkroad Online. Talk about the game or ask questions. Please keep threads Silkroad Online related.
Post Reply
User avatar
cuchulainn
Advanced Member
Posts: 2168
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:09 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Troy

Joymax "considering" banning bots...

Post by cuchulainn »

morningdew wrote: Players were getting frustrated with some of their ideas possibly never being considered or never noticed and this is just not true. I wanted to hopefully clear some suggestions players wanted to know are being considered.

This will be updated as more suggestions come and go.
There is no need to post suggestions in this thread as they are coming from your topics already posted.

-Suggestions Considered-

Bot Prevention
Alternate Silk Purchasing Methods
Website/Forum Update
Login Issues
Crash/Bug Error Disconnects
Text Revision

- More to TBA


Apparently they're finally thinking about banning bots, but it doesn't look liked they decided whether or not to yet.

*2 weeks later*

sro.net wrote:We have considered banning bot users, but have come to the conclusion it would be bad for business so instead of providing a cheat-free game, we're just going to take as much money as we can from you suckers and when the game dies, we'll take a money bath
I'm in your posts, stealing your quotes.
Image

DarkLaw
Active Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:48 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: RedSea

Post by DarkLaw »

...

Can i have those ten seconds of my life it took me to read that back? :P
Last edited by DarkLaw on Sat Mar 24, 2007 8:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lexies2
Loyal Member
Posts: 1739
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:29 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: The staircase to heaven

Post by lexies2 »

I find that humorous... :)
Image

User avatar
XMoshe
Ex-Staff
Posts: 17293
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:13 am
Location: Ghosting around

Post by XMoshe »

Can't wait for that 2nd message >.>
Image
Props to chrisorg for the sig <3

User avatar
Pulsartm
Common Member
Posts: 185
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:08 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Athens

Post by Pulsartm »

We have considered banning bot users, but have come to the conclusion it would be bad for business so instead of providing a cheat-free game, we're just going to take as much money as we can from you suckers and when the game dies, we'll take a money bath


who said that???????
Pure Str Glavie lvl 7x
Pure Int S/S Nuker lvl 69

User avatar
Innovacious
Advanced Member
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:24 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic
Contact:

Re: Joymax "considering" banning bots...

Post by Innovacious »

cuchulainn wrote:
morningdew wrote: Players were getting frustrated with some of their ideas possibly never being considered or never noticed and this is just not true. I wanted to hopefully clear some suggestions players wanted to know are being considered.

This will be updated as more suggestions come and go.
There is no need to post suggestions in this thread as they are coming from your topics already posted.

-Suggestions Considered-

Bot Prevention
Alternate Silk Purchasing Methods
Website/Forum Update
Login Issues
Crash/Bug Error Disconnects
Text Revision

- More to TBA


Apparently they're finally thinking about banning bots, but it doesn't look liked they decided whether or not to yet.


The thread you took that from is a month old now. Bit slow arnt we? :P
ImageImage

User avatar
cuchulainn
Advanced Member
Posts: 2168
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:09 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Troy

Re: Joymax "considering" banning bots...

Post by cuchulainn »

Innovacious wrote:
cuchulainn wrote:
morningdew wrote: Players were getting frustrated with some of their ideas possibly never being considered or never noticed and this is just not true. I wanted to hopefully clear some suggestions players wanted to know are being considered.

This will be updated as more suggestions come and go.
There is no need to post suggestions in this thread as they are coming from your topics already posted.

-Suggestions Considered-

Bot Prevention
Alternate Silk Purchasing Methods
Website/Forum Update
Login Issues
Crash/Bug Error Disconnects
Text Revision

- More to TBA


Apparently they're finally thinking about banning bots, but it doesn't look liked they decided whether or not to yet.


The thread you took that from is a month old now. Bit slow arnt we? :P


Amazing how little I pay attention to sro when I'm playing a game run by a good company, huh?
I'm in your posts, stealing your quotes.
Image

User avatar
[SD]MARKsman7328
Valued Member
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 8:59 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Xian
Contact:

Re: Joymax "considering" banning bots...

Post by [SD]MARKsman7328 »

cuchulainn wrote:
Innovacious wrote:
cuchulainn wrote:
morningdew wrote: Players were getting frustrated with some of their ideas possibly never being considered or never noticed and this is just not true. I wanted to hopefully clear some suggestions players wanted to know are being considered.

This will be updated as more suggestions come and go.
There is no need to post suggestions in this thread as they are coming from your topics already posted.

-Suggestions Considered-

Bot Prevention
Alternate Silk Purchasing Methods
Website/Forum Update
Login Issues
Crash/Bug Error Disconnects
Text Revision

- More to TBA


Apparently they're finally thinking about banning bots, but it doesn't look liked they decided whether or not to yet.


The thread you took that from is a month old now. Bit slow arnt we? :P


Amazing how little I pay attention to sro when I'm playing a game run by a good company, huh?


wow ftw. except its so much more expensive
Image
Phoenix - Mark
ex-Iris. Hybrid Bow - dydx
ex-Venus: BHA:SD Wizard GreatGatsby
ex-Xian character: MARKsman7328

User avatar
SoBlu
Valued Member
Posts: 389
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 4:26 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Athens

Post by SoBlu »

This from the forums?

Just looks like their mentioning what their working on so ppl stop flooding them with Bot Topics like this and the Tavern fan site get flooded with.

I think they failed :roll: .
Image
"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

User avatar
cuchulainn
Advanced Member
Posts: 2168
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:09 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Troy

Re: Joymax "considering" banning bots...

Post by cuchulainn »

MARKsman7328 wrote:
cuchulainn wrote:
Innovacious wrote:
cuchulainn wrote:
morningdew wrote: Players were getting frustrated with some of their ideas possibly never being considered or never noticed and this is just not true. I wanted to hopefully clear some suggestions players wanted to know are being considered.

This will be updated as more suggestions come and go.
There is no need to post suggestions in this thread as they are coming from your topics already posted.

-Suggestions Considered-

Bot Prevention
Alternate Silk Purchasing Methods
Website/Forum Update
Login Issues
Crash/Bug Error Disconnects
Text Revision

- More to TBA


Apparently they're finally thinking about banning bots, but it doesn't look liked they decided whether or not to yet.


The thread you took that from is a month old now. Bit slow arnt we? :P


Amazing how little I pay attention to sro when I'm playing a game run by a good company, huh?


wow ftw. except its so much more expensive


I spent around $600 on SRO in the year I played. That's almost 4 years of playing WoW. WoW cheaper than SRO for me.

Gold Ticket+Monkey>$15/month for WoW
I'm in your posts, stealing your quotes.
Image

User avatar
lolster
Regular Member
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:57 am

Post by lolster »

well wow is sort of a stupid game... there is liek 70 quickslots all over the screen that sor ga y :P
Image

oktaytheazer
Frequent Member
Posts: 1123
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:16 pm
Quick Reply: Yes

Post by oktaytheazer »

its even sounds good "GMs are goin round baning bots" :) dont u just love it ? 8) :D

User avatar
SoBlu
Valued Member
Posts: 389
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 4:26 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Athens

Post by SoBlu »

oktaytheazer wrote:its even sounds good "GMs are goin round baning bots" :) dont u just love it ? 8) :D


Sarcasm or love?

I like WoW and I like SRO, but personally like the rest of us we would rather play a corrupted korean grind MMO for free and pay God knows how much on silk in the background then play WoW for around $180 a year.

We are silly aren't we. :roll:
Image
"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

User avatar
Innovacious
Advanced Member
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:24 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic
Contact:

Post by Innovacious »

SoBlu wrote:
oktaytheazer wrote:its even sounds good "GMs are goin round baning bots" :) dont u just love it ? 8) :D


Sarcasm or love?

I like WoW and I like SRO, but personally like the rest of us we would rather play a corrupted korean grind MMO for free and pay God knows how much on silk in the background then play WoW for around $180 a year.

We are silly aren't we. :roll:


I played WoW for a while, one time i was in one of the big citys and someone said something about bots, another person had no idea what he was talking about! If only silkroad was like that :cry:
ImageImage

User avatar
DeathJester
Frequent Member
Posts: 1074
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 4:02 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: 日本です

Post by DeathJester »

It's like 10$/monthly fee here in Taiwan :o
Image
Image
Lol at people who read year old threads :o

Roh Han
Hi, I'm New Here
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:26 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Somewhere in the world.

Please please please LET - IT - DIE!

Post by Roh Han »

Not With a Bang but a Whimper
By Clive Thompson
02:00 AM Dec, 19, 2005

"Anybody out there?" I type, but I already know it's pointless. There's nobody anywhere near me. For almost an hour, I've been wandering around a desolate plain: Gray clouds scud slowly over rough quartz mountains, while a few birds wheel in the air near mushroom-shaped trees. I never see another living soul. It feels like the end of the world.

And in fact, it is. I'm inside Asheron's Call 2, an online game that is scheduled to die in two weeks. It never acquired enough players to make it self-sufficient, so the game's owner -- Turbine -- is going to do something that only happens rarely in the world of online play: On Dec. 30, it'll flip the power off on the remaining servers, and an entire world will blink out of existence.

This got me wondering: How do people behave in a world where the end is actually nigh? Sci-fi aficionados, Cold War moviemakers and Christian apocalyptics have mused over this for years, since they've assumed that the end of life would have a catalytic effect on the human spirit. In nuclear-war or alien-invasion films like The Day After or War of the Worlds, catastrophic attacks turn America into a landscape of venal looting and family togetherness -- our best impulses mixed with our worst.

But after talking to several longtime players of Asheron's Call 2, I've realized the end of a game world is less cataclysmic -- and more subtle. The players aren't dying in real life; they're just being forced to disband. Their emotional state is thus more like the grief of an indigenous tribe that is being driven off its land by a megacorporation and is losing its way of life. It's kind of like the villagers at the end of Fiddler on the Roof, forced by the czar to abandon their homes and scatter to the four winds.

"It's really heart-wrenching. How will you connect with those people you spent every single day with? It's as though someone suddenly took away all e-mail," as one player who calls herself "Ellen Ripley" online told me. "Suddenly they seem nameless and ethereal, where once they were as real and important as our families, co-workers and Earth-realm friends."

Online worlds are, of course, more than just playlands for slaughtering ogres and collecting magic chain mail. They're social hangouts where players sit around shooting the breeze about their lives, their jobs, their favorite music. "That gives one an odd sense of home. And no one likes to see their homes be demolished," said Chris Thorn, a 26-year-old player in Arlington, Virginia.

The economy has also tanked. When the announcement first came down, players say, a majority of gamers immediately fled. Previously, you'd log on and find several hundred people online; now you'll get nine or 10. High-powered character accounts used to sell for as much as $500, but the online auctions have gone silent. That's partly because, as the end nears, Turbine is tossing out some freebies and giving away more "rare" items, making them less rare. Without a sense of a future, capitalism ends. There's no demand in a condemned world.

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,69848-0.html

I wanted to see all this for myself. But it turned out to be quite difficult to get into the game, because Turbine has sealed the borders; when I called the company, I was told they are no longer allowing any new accounts. So I had to sneak in -- by borrowing the account of an existing user and going in under an assumed identity.

What struck me immediately was how creepy the world had become. "Being in-game is like walking around a ghost town," I was warned by Amy Gilson, a 31-year-old from Philomath, Oregon. "You can almost see the tumbleweeds pass you by." Indeed: Since I'd created a brand-new avatar, I was teleported to "Arwic North Outpost," a newbie area that was gorgeous -- Asheron's Call 2 is a visual treat -- but sepulchrally quiet.

To get in character, I gamely tried to level up my character by killing a few monsters. But I couldn't get past the sense of existential emptiness. At one point, a non-player character assigned me a quest of killing all the burrowing beasts in a nearby canyon, to save her town. I'm like, save the town? Lady, the whole damn world is about to end!

Now as the final days click down, the last denizens of Asheron's Call 2 are wrestling with a question that historically faces all displaced peoples: Where next? Thorn says many in his guild have emigrated to World of Warcraft, a game that is now so hugely popular -- and so overcrowded, with migrants fleeing to other games -- that it has become a virtual version of 19th-century America: A hallowed land of opportunity, where everyone can have fresh start.

Those who still linger are trying to collect memories in any way they can. A newly popular pastime is to take nostalgic photographs. "A lot of folks have gone back to take screenshots of points of memory -- places where 'firsts' took place, like the first time to solo a difficult mob, that kind of thing," Gilson said. Maybe one day 30 years from now, they'll pull them out of a virtual shoebox to show their grandkids. You can't go home again.

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,698 ... page_next1

:twisted:

User avatar
SoBlu
Valued Member
Posts: 389
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 4:26 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Athens

Post by SoBlu »

Roh Han are u a troll,

I just saw this on the tavern site 5 mins ago.

Let ppl browse and comment on their own time, dont leech users from other threads.
Image
"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

User avatar
cuchulainn
Advanced Member
Posts: 2168
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:09 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Troy

Post by cuchulainn »

lolster wrote:well wow is sort of a stupid game... there is liek 70 quickslots all over the screen that sor ga y :P


Lol, you can customize your UI to look exactly how you want it to. You can have as many action bar/buttons as you need, no more, no less.

I have two full 12 slot bars at the bottom, then a few more buttons in the bottom right corner and right side. There's nothing on there I don't need and there aren't any slots showing that I don't need either :P
I'm in your posts, stealing your quotes.
Image

User avatar
ShizKnight
Veteran Member
Posts: 3104
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:01 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: _______

Post by ShizKnight »

cuchulainn wrote:
lolster wrote:well wow is sort of a stupid game... there is liek 70 quickslots all over the screen that sor ga y :P


Lol, you can customize your UI to look exactly how you want it to. You can have as many action bar/buttons as you need, no more, no less.

I have two full 12 slot bars at the bottom, then a few more buttons in the bottom right corner and right side. There's nothing on there I don't need and there aren't any slots showing that I don't need either :P

My UI causes spasgasms. The good kind.

Katou
New Member
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 6:12 am

Re: Joymax "considering" banning bots...

Post by Katou »

cuchulainn wrote:
morningdew wrote: Players were getting frustrated with some of their ideas possibly never being considered or never noticed and this is just not true. I wanted to hopefully clear some suggestions players wanted to know are being considered.

This will be updated as more suggestions come and go.
There is no need to post suggestions in this thread as they are coming from your topics already posted.

-Suggestions Considered-

Bot Prevention
Alternate Silk Purchasing Methods
Website/Forum Update
Login Issues
Crash/Bug Error Disconnects
Text Revision

- More to TBA


Apparently they're finally thinking about banning bots, but it doesn't look liked they decided whether or not to yet.

*2 weeks later*

sro.net wrote:We have considered banning bot users, but have come to the conclusion it would be bad for business so instead of providing a cheat-free game, we're just going to take as much money as we can from you suckers and when the game dies, we'll take a money bath


I don't get it, your saying "they're finally thinking about banning bots"
All I can read is "Bot Prevention"
Bot Prevention is to stop bot application from opening or to make it not working. It doesn't in any way mean they will ban bot.
They only ban gold bot, annoying player and non-existent players, everyone aware of it...

User avatar
cuchulainn
Advanced Member
Posts: 2168
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:09 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Troy

Re: Joymax "considering" banning bots...

Post by cuchulainn »

Katou wrote:
cuchulainn wrote:
morningdew wrote: Players were getting frustrated with some of their ideas possibly never being considered or never noticed and this is just not true. I wanted to hopefully clear some suggestions players wanted to know are being considered.

This will be updated as more suggestions come and go.
There is no need to post suggestions in this thread as they are coming from your topics already posted.

-Suggestions Considered-

Bot Prevention
Alternate Silk Purchasing Methods
Website/Forum Update
Login Issues
Crash/Bug Error Disconnects
Text Revision

- More to TBA


Apparently they're finally thinking about banning bots, but it doesn't look liked they decided whether or not to yet.

*2 weeks later*

sro.net wrote:We have considered banning bot users, but have come to the conclusion it would be bad for business so instead of providing a cheat-free game, we're just going to take as much money as we can from you suckers and when the game dies, we'll take a money bath


I don't get it, your saying "they're finally thinking about banning bots"
All I can read is "Bot Prevention"
Bot Prevention is to stop bot application from opening or to make it not working. It doesn't in any way mean they will ban bot.
They only ban gold bot, annoying player and non-existent players, everyone aware of it...


It's more bullshit from Joymax about maybe doing something that should've been done ages ago.
I'm in your posts, stealing your quotes.
Image

Post Reply

Return to “Silkroad General Discussion”