Another stupid block list

nero22 · Post by **nero22** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:56 pm

BlackFox wrote:@ nero22 Yea and what ?

You seem to be awfully nervous about rev6, why is that?

BlackFox · Post by **BlackFox** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:07 pm

nero22 wrote:
BlackFox wrote:@ nero22 Yea and what ?

You seem to be awfully nervous about rev6, why is that?

NO NO Realy I´am not .. I´am only annyoing when they think they can but not joymax and is only BS what they say about this program only show who have this isrobot not who bots...

And they say it to..

Though we don't call suspicious player a bot, we only add those that match the criteria of a bot.

beav · Post by **beav** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:54 am

so much for "war on bots" lol

Alfred · Post by **Alfred** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:21 am

yamataka wrote:Just a thought about that list ... I know it is short but did everyone notice that it says that these are "alleged bot users"?

Maybe that means that they are these are only the ones that they have received reports on about botting. So maybe all of us need to be very sure we all are reporting bots before there are any complains about the length of the lists.

Oh, I promise they get a fair amount of botter names every week or so.

The quote you are using all the time blackfox is kinda taken out of its sentence.

Normally those who do teleport a lot are called suspicious.
Though we don't call suspicious player a bot, we only add those that match the criteria of a bot.

Which means they can only use the teleporting thing as a way to narrow down suspicious people.

It says clearly in the beginning:

Everyone appearing on this list used isrobot with auto-party feature.

It is pity though that they are even doing this. Botting shouldn't become a problem at this scale. JoyMax need to hire some more and better programmers, thinking more in the direction as 6th rev does. GM's running around asking if people bot or not is lame. And too much time consuming.

BlackFox · Post by **BlackFox** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:47 am

@ Alfred
No is not kinda taken out of its sentence.

(Which means they can only use the teleporting thing as a way to narrow down suspicious people)

(Though we don't call suspicious player a bot)

MastaChiefX · Post by **MastaChiefX** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:51 am

Another great job by JoyMax.

Kenshura · Post by **Kenshura** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 2:48 am

i've only seen one of those bots from the venice list, which was TotemDerErde. He was lvl 3x hardly 40 -.-

FuryAngle · Post by **FuryAngle** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 3:34 am

I just loged onto Xian and made a character named "suunddjd" its also on their BOT list. I made the char after the list was released, so that would mean that char is..........you get the point

Alfred · Post by **Alfred** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:03 am

BlackFox wrote:@ Alfred
No is not kinda taken out of its sentence.

(Which means they can only use the teleporting thing as a way to narrow down suspicious people)

(Though we don't call suspicious player a bot)

you should read it one more time, or maybe even a couple.

[SD]Frites · Post by **[SD]Frites** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 11:18 am

JM is like stalin.. they just make lists of innocent people and ban them (well stalin didnt banned them he killed them)

ranger4life · Post by **ranger4life** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:29 pm

http://www.silkroadonline.net/sro_board ... picID=7864

thats screwed up
disscuss

i cant find his topic so i had to make new topic

nycxfool · Post by **nycxfool** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:01 pm

if the GMs spent ..... 30 minutes per server, they could get rid of at least 20 REAL bots

Silkroad Online Forums

Another stupid block list

master_wongs topic