archers with cold buff and passive or heuksal passive

[BOEE]

is it a good idea?

[Stress]

Maxed out, cold buff + passive gives an extra 97 physical defence. Archers usually invest in cold (there are alot of cold based archers) but it's not necessary. i believe fire archers are better. I think you should level COLD for the novas and buff + passive. To be really effective heuksal passive needs to be maxed out. As heuksal is NOT the tree for archers, the heuksal passive is a pretty bad idea.

[BOEE]

but don't srowd nukers also have the heuskal passive maxed out i was thinking that archers were kinda the same except damage wise that they out any class but there nukes takes time to cast likes archers attacks so the extra hp help to tank

[The_One_]

Well, of course, extra HP is always nice. ut as a full Str archer, ou can tank ALOT more than a nuker. Therefor I think extra defense would be more wise to invest in.

[BOEE]

yes ur rite bout the defense but glavie and spear users have stuns(not to mention very high attaks plus passive) srowd and blade users have extra defense by sheild KD and stab archers have high criticals but no attacks that the other class have but its defence over hp which is better?

[The_One_]

In fact, no. Extra HP will give you advantages in both physical and magical damages. Cold only against physical damage.

But Cold is more usefull than heuksal. Because sometimes it's just cool/useful to have the cold imbue. Or having fun with friends with frost nova.

[BOEE]

yea i like freezing them but pills stop that in pvp

[The_One_]

yea i like freezing them but pills stop that in pvp

Yes, but still. If you fight against nukers, and freeze them, their attack wont continue.

[BOEE]

what if there immune?