Squirt wrote:Is it cause i'm black >=(q
lol'd
Squirt wrote:Is it cause i'm black >=(q
Squirt wrote:Mirosuke wrote:Squirt wrote:I got the Galaxy S4 and I have to say, this is pretty cool.
Well done, good choice. S4 is amazing, although not everyone make 100% use of its functionality.
Do you own an S4?
The camera feature doesn't seem to work where a video is suppose stop if you look away. Is it cause i'm black >=(q



Mirosuke wrote:Lol. My friend has it and we've been experimenting it. Air flip, eye reading, etc. Surprisingly, neither did work for us. Maybe cuz we were asian and couldn't recognize our eyes well... there must be an option.
edit: omg 6666 post :I

Fiction wrote:
Works for me. I think you have to turn the features on in the settings.
Mirosuke wrote:Lol. My friend has it and we've been experimenting it. Air flip, eye reading, etc. Surprisingly, neither did work for us. Maybe cuz we were asian and couldn't recognize our eyes well... there must be an option.
edit: omg 6666 post :I
Tasdik wrote:Squirt wrote:Is it cause i'm black >=(q
lol'd

woutR wrote:Squirt, you're a genius when it comes to raping women.

poehalcho wrote:ltsune wrote:poehalcho wrote:
...I hope that's extra and not total D:
1-3 days is a long time for a Smartphone battery to last, lol.
how the **** did people decide these things were ready to go on the market D:
I can do a whole week with my Sony Ericsson k320i....


woutR wrote:Squirt, you're a genius when it comes to raping women.
Azilius wrote:That's a very narrow sighted view..

Day[9] wrote:"Tea is a lot like gold expansions - it helps you kill people."
- Day[9] Daily 337 -
Squirt wrote:What are these cases the salesman tried pitching for me to buy? They are like 34$ otter something. Are they worth buying, if so any other cheap alternatives?
Yes I am new to smart phones as advanced as this..
Rawr wrote:What do you expect from a phone that is quite literally 100 times more powerful? They're not going to strap a brick sized battery onto it.
1.7" screen vs 5", 128x160 resolution vs 1920x1080, 2G vs 4G, very little functionality vs damn near laptop functionality.
Rawr wrote:What do you expect from a phone that is quite literally 100 times more powerful? They're not going to strap a brick sized battery onto it.
1.7" screen vs 5", 128x160 resolution vs 1920x1080, 2G vs 4G, very little functionality vs damn near laptop functionality.

Day[9] wrote:"Tea is a lot like gold expansions - it helps you kill people."
- Day[9] Daily 337 -
poehalcho wrote:Rawr wrote:What do you expect from a phone that is quite literally 100 times more powerful? They're not going to strap a brick sized battery onto it.
1.7" screen vs 5", 128x160 resolution vs 1920x1080, 2G vs 4G, very little functionality vs damn near laptop functionality.
Please tell, why in the love of god does a 5" screen need a 1920x1080 resolution. My 20" monitor isn't big fcking enough to need that. Why does a phone need a quad core processor when all it does is call, play some music, chat and play games that are simpler than most flash games on newground.
Smartphones are packed to the core with hardware and software that they do not need at all. And if they do need it, it seems like it's made rather inefficiently.
Sanktum wrote:poehalcho wrote:Rawr wrote:What do you expect from a phone that is quite literally 100 times more powerful? They're not going to strap a brick sized battery onto it.
1.7" screen vs 5", 128x160 resolution vs 1920x1080, 2G vs 4G, very little functionality vs damn near laptop functionality.
Please tell, why in the love of god does a 5" screen need a 1920x1080 resolution. My 20" monitor isn't big fcking enough to need that. Why does a phone need a quad core processor when all it does is call, play some music, chat and play games that are simpler than most flash games on newground.
Smartphones are packed to the core with hardware and software that they do not need at all. And if they do need it, it seems like it's made rather inefficiently.
I thought 1080p was a bit too much for even 15,6" I have 17,3" with 1600x900 and I wouldn't buy a smaller laptop with a higher resolution. My old phone takes 1200x1600 pics but they're bad quality anyways because it's only 2MP.

Day[9] wrote:"Tea is a lot like gold expansions - it helps you kill people."
- Day[9] Daily 337 -
poehalcho wrote:Sanktum wrote:poehalcho wrote:Please tell, why in the love of god does a 5" screen need a 1920x1080 resolution. My 20" monitor isn't big fcking enough to need that. Why does a phone need a quad core processor when all it does is call, play some music, chat and play games that are simpler than most flash games on newground.
Smartphones are packed to the core with hardware and software that they do not need at all. And if they do need it, it seems like it's made rather inefficiently.
I thought 1080p was a bit too much for even 15,6" I have 17,3" with 1600x900 and I wouldn't buy a smaller laptop with a higher resolution. My old phone takes 1200x1600 pics but they're bad quality anyways because it's only 2MP.
Pictures and actual screen are completely set apart :/
Nothing wrong with a good camera on your phone, but that doesn't mean it needs a 1920x1080 screen.

Rawr wrote:I prefer power and functionality, you prefer battery economy and simplicity. No matter what we say our opinions will always differ because of that.
I've got a 27" 1440p monitor, a $200 chair, and a 500 watt sound system within 2 feet of me. I assume you have the opposite because you don't feel any of it to be necessary.
You're an economic person with simple desires, if anything I'd say that's a good thing.


Day[9] wrote:"Tea is a lot like gold expansions - it helps you kill people."
- Day[9] Daily 337 -
