This is how we do it

penfold1992 · Post by **penfold1992** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:17 pm

JuelzSantana wrote:pen is a rent a cop, did u see in exposed botters how he tried to get somebody with a post that was over 3 months old?

bots were illegal 3 months ago too, so were multiclients.

but that was an alluring story.

link2113 · Post by **link2113** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:47 pm

penfold1992 wrote:
JuelzSantana wrote:pen is a rent a cop, did u see in exposed botters how he tried to get somebody with a post that was over 3 months old?

bots were illegal 3 months ago too, so were multiclients.

but that was an alluring story.

I think you have way too much free time. And I bet you money that you got picked on at school

360apples · Post by **360apples** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:53 pm

I have to say, there are a lot of nerds on this forum but penfold is definitely locked in for at least top 5.... the scent of nerd is strong within this one. No doubt in my mind that he was picked on.

Strwarrior · Post by **Strwarrior** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:09 am

link2113 wrote:
penfold1992 wrote:
JuelzSantana wrote:pen is a rent a cop, did u see in exposed botters how he tried to get somebody with a post that was over 3 months old?

bots were illegal 3 months ago too, so were multiclients.

but that was an alluring story.

I think you have way too much free time. And I bet you money that you got picked on at school

Listen, its either ur so fkn stupid to think that, or ur trying to offend him.
Its simple, this guy liked sro, enjoyed it, bots farked it up for him, and he is doing his thing, thats all, also i checked that guy that was multiclienting, there is no pvt that will allow up to 32 mc, idk how many client u usually open but i bet you money that u bot.

And i dont think that anyone, including juelz have played fully legitly, bot was somewhere there, either pt or plvl, noone would ever stand a defending position(or opinion shit) if he didnt have something shared with bots(i doubt hero did), but most of the others are.

IMO sro is unplayable anymore, needs too much time for a legit.

penfold1992 · Post by **penfold1992** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:26 am

HAHAHA U GOT PICKED ON AT SCHOOL HAHAHA....

1. that isnt funny as bullying is a serious problem, im a strong believer that punishment in school isnt harsh enough. i was quiet in school and people that were disruptive not only to me but the whole class didnt seem to care.

im a strong believer that bullies should either be put in prison or a rehab center/mental clinic... just my opinion.

also i can say that i have never done anything that wasnt legit. never been in a party with a bot (that i knew of) never been plvled by a bot and never botted myself.
i used to pk2 edit and knew how to pk2 edit invis but didnt do that either.

but no no we all know that a botter has more of a life then a legit... even though they feel like they HAVE to lvl up whilst at sleep school and even watch their bot killing for hours... and post shit on a legit forum trying to single out the minority of people that actually gives a shit about silkroad online.

btw... xbox and facebook games are that way <------- go act like 5 year olds over there please.

Skyve · Post by **Skyve** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:37 am

Bot to Bullies. What's up SRF?

TillTheEnd · Post by **TillTheEnd** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:00 am

wow lol, all this because of a screenshot.
this is a iffing joke.
-This forums needs to add another rule
A:you must NOT reach lvl. 11x or you are a bot, u shall be flame.

Snazzi · Post by **Snazzi** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:40 am

Been following this thread for a while, and I have to agree with both of you (link & penfold + str). But you have no proof that link botted, so I am taking link's side.

penfold1992 · Post by **penfold1992** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:51 am

what about the party with the names Allcaps and Supervillains?

or the insane about of SP even though fire is fully farmed 118 and pacheon is at least 116 with light being at least 114...

but if he was bot plvled sp and exp to 120 but never used a bot... thats still legit right?

definately not a legit.

Strwarrior · Post by **Strwarrior** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:43 am

Lets say allcaps and supervillian are trolls, but sp, also penfold i see no reason why he would open a gap, not even one, so he is probably ff 119.

Swindler · Post by **Swindler** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:28 am

Penfold you got molested as a child bro?

penfold1992 · Post by **penfold1992** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:52 am

Strwarrior wrote:Lets say allcaps and supervillian are trolls, but sp, also penfold i see no reason why he would open a gap, not even one, so he is probably ff 119.

no no, thats "assuming" i was just stating what i can see.... remember that we are wrong for "assuming" that he is a bot. :palm:

Goseki · Post by **Goseki** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:38 pm

I don't get it... although everyone can have their suspicions that a 120 legit doesn't exist, the only thing you can know for sure from the screenshot is that he is in a bot party...

omier · Post by **omier** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:42 pm

Goseki wrote:I don't get it... although everyone can have their suspicions that a 120 legit doesn't exist, the only thing you can know for sure from the screenshot is that he is in a bot party...

Not defending anyone, but you can't even be sure of it being a bot party. :sohappy:

You just assume it is by looking at the names.

Goseki · Post by **Goseki** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:02 pm

Sanktum wrote:
Goseki wrote:I don't get it... although everyone can have their suspicions that a 120 legit doesn't exist, the only thing you can know for sure from the screenshot is that he is in a bot party...

Not defending anyone, but you can't even be sure of it being a bot party. You just assume it is by looking at the names.

No it's pretty obvious. Only a party meant for botting 24/7 would have names like that...
It's one thing to not assume, but it's another to ignore the glaringly obvious.

Snazzi · Post by **Snazzi** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:39 pm

Goseki wrote:
Sanktum wrote:
Goseki wrote:I don't get it... although everyone can have their suspicions that a 120 legit doesn't exist, the only thing you can know for sure from the screenshot is that he is in a bot party...

Not defending anyone, but you can't even be sure of it being a bot party. You just assume it is by looking at the names.

No it's pretty obvious. Only a party meant for botting 24/7 would have names like that...
It's one thing to not assume, but it's another to ignore the glaringly obvious.

Screenshots have never been proof that people have been a bot. So seeing as you have no proof that he is a bot, you are all assuming (although it might seem obvious)... isn't that like false accusation shit?

penfold1992 · Post by **penfold1992** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:23 pm

well... i guess it would be, but seeing as the accusation isnt false this one can be overlooked.

Snazzi · Post by **Snazzi** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:06 pm

mmhkay.

Post by **Gaigemasta** » Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:15 am

waiting for this thread to be locked

Strwarrior · Post by **Strwarrior** » Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:38 am

Screen shots was never considered as proof because bots and legits lvls were near, this one is no, sp, and names in the party....................

JuelzSantana · Post by **JuelzSantana** » Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:24 am

Strwarrior wrote:Screen shots was never considered as proof because bots and legits lvls were near, this one is no, sp, and names in the party....................

so what you're telling me is that your accusations are false and out of thin air. just because a black person is running with baggy clothing on doesn't mean he is running from a crime he just committed. you're being EXTREMELY judgemental with no valid reason other than your own suspicion which isn't much.

Strwarrior · Post by **Strwarrior** » Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:49 am

JuelzSantana wrote:
Strwarrior wrote:Screen shots was never considered as proof because bots and legits lvls were near, this one is no, sp, and names in the party....................

so what you're telling me is that your accusations are false and out of thin air. just because a black person is running with baggy clothing on doesn't mean he is running from a crime he just committed. you're being EXTREMELY judgemental with no valid reason other than your own suspicion which isn't much.

Your comprasion is Farking fail, please think :palm:

However,

That black man running:
1. Maybe trying to catchup something, a class or watever, a white man running is the same,

(which is same as legits and bots during 90 cap, the ff was doable legitly, so screen shots were never enough, but now being ff 119 needs tons of time for a legit, which if u count the 5 hours per day gaming it wont be enough to reach 120 ff by this time if u was a legit.)

2. Committed a crime.

This guy:
1.botpt
2.botplvl
3.bot
4. *Put something here that can describe that sp and lvl*
Reason: ff with this sp, pt names, and reaching this lvl at this time.

Post by **Majorharper** » Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:08 pm

Who the fck cares omg get your cry baby ass out of here seriously 4 pages now and you are still crying? Everyone knows it we are not morons BUT WE COULDNT CARE LESS. Seriously go do something else you're pathetic

Kronos · Post by **Kronos** » Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:08 pm

Majorharper wrote:Who the fck cares omg get your cry baby ass out of here seriously 4 pages now and you are still crying? Everyone knows it we are not morons BUT WE COULDNT CARE LESS. Seriously go do something else you're pathetic

Eh, seriously. Who is crying? I can just see that some people want to keep the forum as clean as it should be. They are just people, who still care about the forum and want it to stay, what it used to be or at least what it should be. They just don't want this forum to be overrun by bots showing off their characters and i really don't want that either.

Unfortunately i don't think this screenshot is enough proof to get him banned from the forum in this case. It definitely is enough proof for me to know, that he is a bot or at least not legit, according to my standards. But i just doubt, that a high level or a huge ammount of SP or in this case both is enough proof for this forum. Most legits would certainly agree, that this guy is not legit, when they see the screenshot, but the legit "standards" of this forum are rather low. For example every true legit would say, that a bot pleveled character is not legit, but for this forum it wouldn't be a problem at all, as long as the character itself is not using the bot.

penfold1992 · Post by **penfold1992** » Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:06 pm

yes on uranus a warlock called Warlord iirc had a 8 man botting pt and he removed one of the chars replaced it with another of his chars that wasnt botting.... that char was then apparently legit. -.-

omier · Post by **omier** » Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:10 pm

penfold1992 wrote:yes on uranus a warlock called Warlord iirc had a 8 man botting pt and he removed one of the chars replaced it with another of his chars that wasnt botting.... that char was then apparently legit. -.-

Yep, the char itself was legit. :sohappy:

Kaninstek · Post by **Kaninstek** » Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:06 pm

Been off the forum a few days, glad I didn't miss anything

.curve · Post by **.curve** » Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:36 am

How did I miss this thread? Epicness ensued.

Few things:
1. penfold go outside
2. grats OP for sticking it out on official servers and capping. Enjoy the lack of considerable end game content that SRO offers
3. Exposed Botters WAS the worst thing to happen to this forum, but it also brought so many good laughs. RIP anyone cool who got banned because of that
4. If you did bot, grats not getting caught I guess

iSinnnn · Post by **iSinnnn** » Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:08 am

i had to double-check to make sure this thread wasn't from 2009. i'll pray for you guys.

Snazzi · Post by **Snazzi** » Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:40 am

iSinnnn wrote:i had to double-check to make sure this thread wasn't from 2009. i'll pray for you guys.

Silkroad Online Forums

This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it

Re: This is how we do it