server were using taxies isn't required

madah123 · Post by **madah123** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 10:30 am

I am want to start over in sro and I am looking for a server where I can find parties starting from level 25 + and preferably with english speaking players.
(yes I realize I used were instead of where so don't comment on that.)

Diversity · Post by **Diversity** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:04 pm

Most likely every server will not have this. Too much botting and so forth, but I suggest try azteca, many SRF members play there. So it's a great place to start.

madah123 · Post by **madah123** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:24 pm

ok I am either making a cleric bard or a warlock cleric any guild in azteca want's any of those?

penfold1992 · Post by **penfold1992** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:55 pm

madah123 wrote:ok I am either making a cleric bard or a warlock cleric any guild in azteca want's any of those?

no.. we want tanks xD

madah123 · Post by **madah123** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:59 pm

that's really a shame ( unless you want full str cleric lol?) but from which level do parties start? ong? what about the community are they active or bots?

Diversity · Post by **Diversity** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:49 am

Oh yeah totally bot free. That's ofcourse if the game isnt called silkroad online.

CeLL · Post by **CeLL** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:34 am

go to xian, no taxi required there.

penfold1992 · Post by **penfold1992** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:59 am

madah123 wrote:that's really a shame ( unless you want full str cleric lol?) but from which level do parties start? ong? what about the community are they active or bots?

99% bots to be honest... but yes there is a legit community.

you maybe get into a ong lvl party but im lvl 50 now and to be honest because we have tanks that are incredibly dumb *cough* DEL! *cough* we havent been able to sucessfully party really =(
however i can get into the cave now

Silkroad Online Forums

server were using taxies isn't required

server were using taxies isn't required

Re: server were using taxies isn't required

Re: server were using taxies isn't required

Re: server were using taxies isn't required

Re: server were using taxies isn't required

Re: server were using taxies isn't required

Re: server were using taxies isn't required

Re: server were using taxies isn't required