omier44 wrote:Atomic bombs are still not life savers. Simply not using them is not equal to saving lives. I could also say that i saved a life because i didn't pull the trigger on a random guy.
This was my doubt while I was writing my reply.
Aaron777 wrote:Doron wrote:Hold it McLovin,
The Atom Bomb saved people?
Where/when? Maybe I just lack lessons in history but.. I believe they only kill....
Well the bombs themselves didn't actually save anyone, however, if the U.S. would have invaded the Japanese islands, the casualties of American troops was projected at around 500,000. The total Japanese death toll ended up being around 200,000. Roosevelt felt the cost of Japanese citizens was worth the end of the war. If he hadn't dropped the bombs, the result would've been a large percentage more casualties for both sides.
And this is what I have just read, 'cept it was not president Roosevelt, but president Truman, because Roosevelt died on April 12th.
Still..I think this not quite a right assumption, even though people who support this theory claim that this is what the official Allied plan says.
Unfortunately for them, History is not made up of ifs and buts, but of facts and people.
Fast EDIT:
Doron wrote:Wow Roosevelt was such a partypooper.
Actually, Roosevelt was one of the best presidents the USA have ever had. He was praised worldwide because he found a solution to the economic collapse in 1929. I've read of Irish and Italians having pictures of him hang on the wall, besides those of Eamon de Valera or of the Pope.