Rawr~ wrote:I would like to have smaller maps since I don't see playing with 64 players being lag free. In BFBC2 I often spend my time just looking for people unless I sit on a point and just wait.
that's why I never really liked BF. The game is way too strategic and lacks action imo. The only part about it that I like are the graphics and that it requires real skills. Cod is easy as f*ck but it's fun. It's just pure action, running free through the map and raping everyone. You can't do that shi!t with BF.
''When I die, make sure they bury me upside down, so that the world can kiss my ass.''
Rawr~ wrote:I would like to have smaller maps since I don't see playing with 64 players being lag free. In BFBC2 I often spend my time just looking for people unless I sit on a point and just wait.
that's why I never really liked BF. The game is way too strategic and lacks action imo. The only part about it that I like are the graphics and that it requires real skills. Cod is easy as f*ck but it's fun. It's just pure action, running free through the map and raping everyone. You can't do that shi!t with BF.
And those reasons, are exactly the reason why I like Battlefield. It's different for everyone.
Rawr~ wrote:I would like to have smaller maps since I don't see playing with 64 players being lag free. In BFBC2 I often spend my time just looking for people unless I sit on a point and just wait.
that's why I never really liked BF. The game is way too strategic and lacks action imo. The only part about it that I like are the graphics and that it requires real skills. Cod is easy as f*ck but it's fun. It's just pure action, running free through the map and raping everyone. You can't do that shi!t with BF.
And those reasons, are exactly the reason why I like Battlefield. It's different for everyone.
Well maybe not different from anyone, but different from other AAA shooter. Beside of that i find it much more pleasing when i am able to storm a flag with my mates due to perfect communication and teamwork of everyone. COD for example just can't bring me that feeling cause everybody can just run in and rambo everyone to death and maybe throw in a flashbang if you want to go for a tactical approach.
Rawr~ wrote:I would like to have smaller maps since I don't see playing with 64 players being lag free. In BFBC2 I often spend my time just looking for people unless I sit on a point and just wait.
that's why I never really liked BF. The game is way too strategic and lacks action imo. The only part about it that I like are the graphics and that it requires real skills. Cod is easy as f*ck but it's fun. It's just pure action, running free through the map and raping everyone. You can't do that shi!t with BF.
And those reasons, are exactly the reason why I like Battlefield. It's different for everyone.
If you find BFBC2 to be lacking action you aren't playing it right.
When I play I get as much action as COD, and more so than CS since you don't have to wait until the end of the round.
(3:40 WTF)
Code: Select all
To get into the fights in BFBC2 you have to know where they will happen. You need to remember that teammates spawn on eachother or on flags. So, head to where the bad guys are heading and when they die, head toward cap point at which they would be most likely to spawn.
Exceptions are the giant Farking maps on BFBC2, which is why I like Vietnam more.
If you want super Farking action, play on a 32+ player server on Rush. You get 32 players within spitting distance.
Rawr~ wrote:I would like to have smaller maps since I don't see playing with 64 players being lag free. In BFBC2 I often spend my time just looking for people unless I sit on a point and just wait.
that's why I never really liked BF. The game is way too strategic and lacks action imo. The only part about it that I like are the graphics and that it requires real skills. Cod is easy as f*ck but it's fun. It's just pure action, running free through the map and raping everyone. You can't do that shi!t with BF.
2142 you could easily do it when the ship's shields are down and you're all boarding it.
But that's what I like about BF. It isn't instant action which I find boring.. well excluding Bad Company
If being a loser means not playing Silkroad all day.. lulwut?
Rawr~ wrote:I would like to have smaller maps since I don't see playing with 64 players being lag free. In BFBC2 I often spend my time just looking for people unless I sit on a point and just wait.
that's why I never really liked BF. The game is way too strategic and lacks action imo. The only part about it that I like are the graphics and that it requires real skills. Cod is easy as f*ck but it's fun. It's just pure action, running free through the map and raping everyone. You can't do that shi!t with BF.
And those reasons, are exactly the reason why I like Battlefield. It's different for everyone.
I'm Different. I like Halo/Cod/Battlefield I guess it depends on my mood, but I get equal enjoyment out of all 3. They are just fun as fuck. Just when you think the game can't get any better, they release and even better looking one that makes you toss away that $60
I am getting this. No Doubt! The first trailer they released already had me sold. The 12 minute gameplay one. Insane. I'd even go so far as to say from what I've seen between this and Mw3, I like these graphics more. There's just a nice balance between the environment and character. Mw2 lacked on Environment graphics and focused more on players but it was still awesome. Mw3 looks nice, but I'd have to see more to make a fair argument. Over all, Battlefield Bad Company 2 -> Battlefield 3 Graphics is a Massive Improvement. Mw2 -> Mw3 doesn't look as Impressive.
I see that as someone trying really hard to get a news story. He probably simply asked to be a part of the demo or had a rep do it and it got blown out of proportion. Honestly though, can you blame him? lol
Blackdragon6 wrote:I see that as someone trying really hard to get a news story. He probably simply asked to be a part of the demo or had a rep do it and it got blown out of proportion. Honestly though, can you blame him? lol
The thing was he expected to jump in front of the line, but they didn't allow him. I'm not sure if the military people and xzibit had to wait in line though. I could imagine they were just allowed to jump in front. I'd honestly be okay with it.
Of course the news story is getting out of context easily, but hey.. it's all about Bobby Kotick trying to play the game. Regardless of what happened.
If being a loser means not playing Silkroad all day.. lulwut?
- Squad Leader confirmed, 4 Person Squad - Ability to spot a Enemy Squad Leader - Equippable Grenades - Falling debris from destruction 3.0 can kill players! - Equippable knife as well as quick knife (like BC2) - Support class able to mount bipods and give ammo - Rifleman class has medpack + defibrillator - Ability to change fire modes in multiplayer (semi/burst/auto) - Regenerative health in MP, but suppression effect stops regen (only regen when you aren't under fire) - Suppression effects from LMG, blur vision - Flashlights can blind the enemy - First Person Animations in Multiplayer - Faction Specific Weapons + Unlocks - Vehicles can be immobilized before being destroyed - Able to opt out of Revives in Multiplayer - 3D spotting (not too sure what this is...)
BF3 ID: Alpinewolf007 Though I Fly Through the Valley of Death, I Shall Fear No Evil. For I am at 80,000 Feet and Climbing.
nitrofreez wrote:Some multiplayer details that were revealed:
- Squad Leader confirmed, 4 Person Squad - Ability to spot a Enemy Squad Leader - Equippable Grenades - Falling debris from destruction 3.0 can kill players! - Equippable knife as well as quick knife (like BC2) - Support class able to mount bipods and give ammo - Rifleman class has medpack + defibrillator - Ability to change fire modes in multiplayer (semi/burst/auto) - Regenerative health in MP, but suppression effect stops regen (only regen when you aren't under fire) - Suppression effects from LMG, blur vision - Flashlights can blind the enemy - First Person Animations in Multiplayer - Faction Specific Weapons + Unlocks - Vehicles can be immobilized before being destroyed - Able to opt out of Revives in Multiplayer - 3D spotting (not too sure what this is...)
I knew i saw the LMG take down his Bi-Pod in one of the videos that came out of E3, but my friends wouldn't believe me. Sweet. Love mounted Machine-guns.
nitrofreez wrote:Some multiplayer details that were revealed:
- Squad Leader confirmed, 4 Person Squad - Ability to spot a Enemy Squad Leader - Equippable Grenades - Falling debris from destruction 3.0 can kill players! - Equippable knife as well as quick knife (like BC2) - Support class able to mount bipods and give ammo - Rifleman class has medpack + defibrillator - Ability to change fire modes in multiplayer (semi/burst/auto) - Regenerative health in MP, but suppression effect stops regen (only regen when you aren't under fire) - Suppression effects from LMG, blur vision - Flashlights can blind the enemy - First Person Animations in Multiplayer - Faction Specific Weapons + Unlocks - Vehicles can be immobilized before being destroyed - Able to opt out of Revives in Multiplayer - 3D spotting (not too sure what this is...)
Brago wrote:Squad leader must get something special.
3D spotting, seems like we may get an overview of a map or something.
sounds great i cant wait.
As far as i got told squad leader haven't got some special stuff like commander in BF2, but he is the only person you can spawn on (which is a good feature in my opinion, might enforce team play withing pug-squads a bit more)
The 3D spotting is the triangle thing over the enemies head you already can see in BFBC2
