Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

_Clitrix_ · Post by **_Clitrix_** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:36 am

Tragic, 2012 is nearing, coincidence?

Post by **Crowley** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:44 am

Coincidence. Pretty big earth quake though, the last one in Christchurch was effin' tiny.

Squirt · Post by **Squirt** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 2:19 pm

I just can't believe how silly the name of that city is.

CeLL · Post by **CeLL** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 2:59 pm

maybe this is gods way of telling new zealand to stop drinking horse sperm.

EvGa · Post by **EvGa** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:22 pm

Strong city name to event ratio.

God is good.

MrJoey · Post by **MrJoey** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:23 pm

Squirt wrote:I just can't believe how silly the name of that city is.

jyushinshuu · Post by **jyushinshuu** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:22 am

why would Jesus made earthquake in Chirstchurch?

kreisimees · Post by **kreisimees** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:32 am

_Clitrix_ wrote:2012 is nearing

jyushinshuu · Post by **jyushinshuu** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:38 am

why did 6.3 magnitude of earthquake did so much damage in Christchurch? It's not like its a 3rd world country compared to Haiti.

6.3 is not that strong to do that much damage.

Key-J · Post by **Key-J** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 4:18 pm

6.3 is very strong dude. Remember, each point that it goes up is exponential.

Furthermore, 2 other key factors need to be examined:

Distance from Epicenter, and Wave type.

If the epicenter was right under ChristChurch then one could expect a lot lot of damage. However, if the epicenter was far away in some remote place, but the shocks that hit Christ Church were 6.3 then it could (not would) do less damage.

Also, if the waves that ChristChurch felt were Horizontal waves, then less damage could be expected, however if they were Vertical waves, a lot more damage could be expected.

MrTwilliger · Post by **MrTwilliger** » Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:57 pm

Exactly a week and a half prior to this event occurring, my mother was holidaying in Christchurch. We are all pretty thankful that she didn't extend her tip.

It's a terrible event though, truly tragic. I'm thankful that the death count is still quite low, it could of easily been a lot higher.

Kraq · Post by **Kraq** » Sat Feb 26, 2011 6:34 am

_Clitrix_ wrote:Tragic, 2012 is nearing, coincidence?

Such ignorance, smh.

MrTwilliger wrote:Exactly a week and a half prior to this event occurring, my mother was holidaying in Christchurch. We are all pretty thankful that she didn't extend her tip.

It's a terrible event though, truly tragic. I'm thankful that the death count is still quite low, it could of easily been a lot higher.

Woah, that reminds me of when my family and I vacationed in Los Cabos, Mexico right before the big tornado hit all of that area. Coincidence?

_Clitrix_ · Post by **_Clitrix_** » Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:19 am

god likes tourists?

heroo · Post by **heroo** » Sun Feb 27, 2011 5:04 am

_Clitrix_ wrote:god likes tourists?

yeah, cause tourists are good for heaven's economy. right?

Mindy · Post by **Mindy** » Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:58 am

heroo wrote:
_Clitrix_ wrote:god likes tourists?

yeah, cause tourists are good for heaven's economy. right?

They usually do have money with them so why not?

Silkroad Online Forums

Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.

Re: Christchurch- new zealand Earthquakes.