What sub for wizard?

[Thy]

I know this has probably been talked about multiple times. The thing is I plan to almost always train with 2 of my friends. One is a warrior tank sub-warlock and the other is a cleric/bard. So here's how I see it:

Cleric-more bless, rez the cleric/bard if he dies
Bard-noise, dances with the cleric/bard
Warlock-more damage?

What's your opinion?

[Tia]

Taking warlock wouldn't be very smart. I saw a video about 80 or 90 cap, wizard/warlock pvp, it was pretty good, but now, it would be a 1 hit kill in pvp.And you wouldnt really benefit the pt much. Say you got a PT giant. You switch to warlock, debuff,DoTs, switch back to staff and use LC. IMO it would take too much time, pointlessly.

Cleric- Would be better for the PT, you can get 2 blesses,which helps a lot.
Bard-Pretty useless in your PT since you already have a cleric/bard.

[Fox Mulder]

Definitely Cleric. It's always nice to have another 45 seconds of Bless in case of emergency and a second res in case the cleric is killed.

Bard would be pointless because if you want to have dances, both you and the cleric/bard have to stay with your Harps on, which is obviously no good. And you won't really need Noise if there is a warrior in the party.

If you choose Warlock, changing weapon to debuff each monster would be too much of a hassle and you'll end up using it only on giants (maybe not even then, since your warrior/warlock friend can do it as well).

[S3by]

Cleric all the way .

[Gladiator_RN]

Cleric.

[Thy]

I guess everyone agrees with cleric then, thank you guys

[campananico]

Bard
Even as a supporting bard in PT I can still deal out pretty good damage

[Tia]

Warrior isnt for dmg..

[Thy]

yeah that's what I was thinking. I would be the only one doing damage