Proposition 19.

RiceFarmer · Post by **RiceFarmer** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:42 am

What's your stance on this?

Less than a week to go till the vote. I don't live in California, and I don't do weed, but I support the legislation 100%.

Swindler · Post by **Swindler** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:09 pm

I dont live in California, hell I dont even live in America but I support it.

.curve · Post by **.curve** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:56 pm

I support it for the fact that it would make the state of California a ton of money.

Also, weed would still be illegal according to Federal law, and it follows the same guidelines as alcohol. Meaning no driving while high, have to be 21+ to buy, grow, consume it.

I'll be voting yes.

CeLL · Post by **CeLL** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:01 pm

i support it. i dont consume, but i support it.

*BlackFox · Post by *BlackFox » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:09 pm

Meh.. I Just don't support it.

Flara · Post by **Flara** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:20 pm

don't live there but probably wouldnt support it.

Love · Post by **Love** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:28 pm

*BlackFox wrote:Meh.. I Just don't support it.

translation I have no respect for others therefore I will use guns to force them to behave in a way that I approve of, oh yes I am a s*)() f*&(*&(.

In a more ideal world if you tried to actually enforce this you wouldn't have a life, fun observation.

.AWAKE. · Post by **.AWAKE.** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:48 pm

i live in california and i support it 100%

*BlackFox · Post by *BlackFox » Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:22 pm

Love wrote:translation I have no respect for others therefore I will use guns to force them to behave in a way that I approve of, oh yes I am a s*)() f*&(*&(.

Well, despite the crappy translation quality.. But that is Just too hilarious. lulz

CeLL · Post by **CeLL** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:41 pm

*BlackFox wrote:
Love wrote:translation I have no respect for others therefore I will use guns to force them to behave in a way that I approve of, oh yes I am a s*)() f*&(*&(.
Well, despite the crappy translation quality.. But that is Just too hilarious. lulz

i think it was a terrible attempt at trolling. no pot head is that angery.

Vaya · Post by **Vaya** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:17 pm

People do it anyway, So why not

*BlackFox · Post by *BlackFox » Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:31 pm

CeLL wrote:i think it was a terrible attempt at trolling. no pot head is that angery.

Yeah, I suppose so.. xD

EvGa · Post by **EvGa** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:55 pm

Anybody who opposes this is ignorant and/or bigoted.

Midori · Post by **Midori** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:58 pm

Don't really care.

I'm still not sure how it will bring the state money though, the majority of weed comes from outside the U.S., illegally imported. Can't really tax something that you can go out and buy off the street.

CeLL · Post by **CeLL** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:02 pm

i could just as easily buy tobacco from a farmer, does that mean they have a hard time taxing it and regulating it? i could easily buy wine, beer and whiskey from someone making it in their home. they still tax it and regulate it.

kontroversy · Post by **kontroversy** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:27 pm

X-Lax wrote:Don't really care.

I'm still not sure how it will bring the state money though, the majority of weed comes from outside the U.S., illegally imported. Can't really tax something that you can go out and buy off the street.

Obviously you have never been to California. The majority of our weed comes from right here ^^

Post by **Doron** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:32 pm

I never vote so don't really care.

Phenom_ · Post by **Phenom_** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:08 pm

Lol at everyone saying they dont "consume" it. Well I smoke weed. A fair bit lol. Just felt the need to say it =] While my reason is purely recreational, I do believe that there are some people that can benefit from it. As well as tax money being a HUGE plus, we're talking billions of dollars here.

inky · Post by **inky** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:21 pm

I support it. Whether or not it gets approved, people are going to smoke it. If approved, it's going to generate more tax revenue for the state and it's also going to decrease drug-related violence. We can simply treat it the same way we do with alcohol.

Post by **Doron** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:56 pm

May I ask(to the users of weed), why do you smoke weed?

CeLL · Post by **CeLL** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:58 pm

Doron wrote:May I ask(to the users of weed), why do you smoke weed?

cause they like it. just like tobacco smokers.

Dimethyltryptamine · Post by **Dimethyltryptamine** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:11 pm

I would definitely vote yes. Weed costs me so much money each week - I want to grow!

EvGa · Post by **EvGa** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:12 pm

^^ Strong username to topic ratio.

Midori · Post by **Midori** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:26 pm

i still don't see how it is going to get taxed if it's not being sold by a company/buisness/government.

Could someone give me a detailed explanation on how this can/might be done?

EvGa · Post by **EvGa** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:28 pm

Companies would start selling it. Little shops would open up. etc.

TheDrop · Post by **TheDrop** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:34 pm

EvGa wrote:Anybody who opposes this is ignorant and/or bigoted.

oh the irony

Midori · Post by **Midori** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:36 pm

EvGa wrote:Companies would start selling it. Little shops would open up. etc.

But how would that stop the already massive illegal market?

EvGa · Post by **EvGa** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:41 pm

UnbeatableDevil wrote:
EvGa wrote:Anybody who opposes this is ignorant and/or bigoted.

oh the irony

Oh, do go on.

Post by **dom** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:43 pm

Doron wrote:May I ask(to the users of weed), why do you smoke weed?

It's part of my dutch national heritage. I need to be proud of my roots.

Skyve · Post by **Skyve** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:14 pm

Doron wrote:May I ask(to the users of weed), why do you smoke weed?

Why do you smoke cigarettes? Derp

Silkroad Online Forums

Proposition 19.

Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.

Re: Proposition 19.