Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
- Blurred
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 2894
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:30 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
- Contact:
Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Who do you think is going to win it?
CTRL+W = ?
----------------------------------------------
xFire: blurred1
Steam: l33chie
----------------------------------------------
xFire: blurred1
Steam: l33chie
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Colts.
But I'm rooting for the Saints the whole way. = )
But I'm rooting for the Saints the whole way. = )
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
probably the colts, but id rather see new orleans win in their first super bowl appearance.

ECSRO ~ 86 Blader Dead
- curvekiller
- Active Member
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Bavaria
- Contact:
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Colts, but not cause I like them. NO was just too weak against the Vikings...
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*
Guild Wars 2
Still checking SRF for the community.
- vietxboy911
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3236
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:04 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: london2012
- Contact:
- woutR
- Elite Member
- Posts: 5573
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 5:20 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
I know absolutely nothing about american football, but I'd still like to venture a guess: I go for Colts!

<<
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Hell I'm not that into football but even I watched the game!
Peterson was a god damn fore throughout the whole game like a mate of mine says.
I could've sworn that Favre got hurt though! He got tackled pretty rough and he was limping.
I think that the Saints can beat the colts, with Favre and Peterson I'm not sure, I'm thinking the Vikings could have done better against the colts.
This is a hard one, But I'mma have to go with the Colts because of Manning.
But Brees didn't do that bad throughout the game, he did have to do extra work than a quarterback should, so did Favre.
It was a back and forth game
!
Peterson was a god damn fore throughout the whole game like a mate of mine says.
I could've sworn that Favre got hurt though! He got tackled pretty rough and he was limping.
I think that the Saints can beat the colts, with Favre and Peterson I'm not sure, I'm thinking the Vikings could have done better against the colts.
This is a hard one, But I'mma have to go with the Colts because of Manning.
But Brees didn't do that bad throughout the game, he did have to do extra work than a quarterback should, so did Favre.
It was a back and forth game

Spoiler!
woutR wrote:Squirt, you're a genius when it comes to raping women.
- vietxboy911
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3236
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:04 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: london2012
- Contact:
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Yes, Saints could of won in regulation. They simply couldnt convert turnovers into points, and i'd say if they want to win the superbowl they need to score with the oppurtunities given
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Saints are so bad, sooo bad.
- Heosphoros
- Active Member
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:20 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off topic
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Colts. If you disagree, you probably don't watch football.
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Heosphoros wrote:Colts. If you disagree, you probably don't watch football.
Living on a prayer.

Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Peyton manning is the best ever
imagine if he had WRs outside of reggie wayne, the guy is a stud.
imagine if he had WRs outside of reggie wayne, the guy is a stud.

Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Peterson has the potential to be one of the greatest running backs ever, if only he'd learn to hang onto the damn ball. You'd think during college he would've learned how to, apparently not.
*CJ love*
*CJ love*
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Tasdik wrote:Peterson has the potential to be one of the greatest running backs ever, if only he'd learn to hang onto the damn ball. You'd think during college he would've learned how to, apparently not.
*CJ love*
He only played 1 year in college, his freshman year and would've won the Heisman if it wasnt for Matt Leinart.
He was plagued by injuries, and went onto the draft after missing an entire year due to a broken collarbone.
Everyone knows he fumbles, he's like Tiki barber, it took Tiki 8 years to learn not to fumble, and that's basically a RB's entire life span in the nfl.

- the_wicked
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 1:49 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Whisperwind [US-PVE]
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Saints should have lost to Minnesota by like 14.
So theres no chance they're stopping peyton.
So theres no chance they're stopping peyton.

Spoiler!
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
peyton isnt good at football, he should stick to making commercials
- McLovin1t
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:00 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Zypher wrote:peyton isnt good at football, he should stick to making commercials
Kinda like how Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson wasn't a great wrestler, but the best actor we've ever seen.
OR
Kinda like Arnold Schwarzanegger (I think), not the best actor, but the best governor we've ever seen.

ZSZC Water - Pure Int S/S 3x
ZSZC Fire - Pure Str Bow 4x
ZSZC Fire - Pure Int Spear 4x
- iSinnnn
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:18 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: mavnation.
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
dom wrote:Vikings
this.
and colts will win, probably by two or more possessions. it seems like every year recently there's a boring team i don't want to see in the super bowl (seahawks, bears, cardinals, saints)
in short: **** you nfc, get good.
- CeLL
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4441
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
McLovin1t wrote:Zypher wrote:peyton isnt good at football, he should stick to making commercials
Kinda like how Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson wasn't a great wrestler, but the best actor we've ever seen.
OR
Kinda like Arnold Schwarzanegger (I think), not the best actor, but the best governor we've ever seen.
the rock was a good wrestler.

^^Thanks Thomas42
- woutR
- Elite Member
- Posts: 5573
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 5:20 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
McLovin1t wrote:Zypher wrote:peyton isnt good at football, he should stick to making commercials
Kinda like how Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson wasn't a great wrestler, but the best actor we've ever seen.
OR
Kinda like Arnold Schwarzanegger (I think), not the best actor, but the best governor we've ever seen.
hahahahaha
Good one!

<<
- Ganja
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1494
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:44 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: off topic
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Who Dat?
- cpinney
- Ex-Staff
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:34 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Maine, USA
- Contact:
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
iSinnnn wrote:dom wrote:Vikings
this.
and colts will win, probably by two or more possessions. it seems like every year recently there's a boring team i don't want to see in the super bowl (seahawks, bears, cardinals, saints)
in short: **** you nfc, get good.
how are the cardinals and saints boring teams?
not to mention last years Superbowl was one of the best in recent memory.

- iSinnnn
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:18 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: mavnation.
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
cpinney wrote:iSinnnn wrote:dom wrote:Vikings
this.
and colts will win, probably by two or more possessions. it seems like every year recently there's a boring team i don't want to see in the super bowl (seahawks, bears, cardinals, saints)
in short: **** you nfc, get good.
how are the cardinals and saints boring teams?
not to mention last years Superbowl was one of the best in recent memory.
by boring i meant that the players themselves were boring, referring more towards their careers/current legacy than playstyle. going into it, the only "superstar" was warner, fitzgerald broke out in the playoffs, and has always been great but he really got recognized in that playoff run.
the defense? what defense?
i could have really cared less about any of that cardinals roster getting to the super bowl let alone winning one. admittedly the game was pretty good, or maybe it just seemed that way because.. bears.. seahawks.. hell even the panthers.
as for the saints, i'd rather see manning tack another ring onto his hall of fame resume then watch a team that arguably is very lucky to be there in the first place win it all.
it's going to be painful to watch regardless, i was looking forward to manning's legacy vs brett's last shot.
- vietxboy911
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3236
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:04 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: london2012
- Contact:
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
you shouldnt fumble "all day" if you want to think like that
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
CeLL wrote:McLovin1t wrote:Zypher wrote:peyton isnt good at football, he should stick to making commercials
Kinda like how Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson wasn't a great wrestler, but the best actor we've ever seen.
OR
Kinda like Arnold Schwarzanegger (I think), not the best actor, but the best governor we've ever seen.
the rock was a good wrestler.
ya mclovin is confused as fucc
- Da_Realest
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2435
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 4:30 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
Re: Super Bowl: Saints vs. Colts
Been a Colt's fan since '94. I expect the Colts to win if they can stop Reggie Bush.
Ziegfried wrote:What you do or say in any game is a small extension of who you really are. It's the anonymity that can allow them to show their true self, or who they would be if there was no "penalty" for their actions.






