If you can remove one thing from the world

Squirt · Post by **Squirt** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:13 pm

DarkJackal wrote:Everyone knows about the Anti-verse.

Yes, So if I remove the Anti-verse will that cancel out our universe from existence?

Miguez · Post by **Miguez** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:50 pm

Fat woman, I do not like.

LaloHao · Post by **LaloHao** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:58 pm

seriously WHAT THE FUCK

Miguez · Post by **Miguez** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:59 pm

ofy1993 wrote:
Thee_UniQue wrote:Fat woman, I do not like.

according to Silo, then you would also have to remove thin women.

OH GOD THE HORROR! MAKE THEM STOPPPPPPPPP!!!

who cares about silo

Wu · Post by Wu » Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:12 pm

I'd remove fourchan; it sucked dozens of hours of my life away and it turned the entire internet into little fourchanners. I die a little inside when people post things like 'I am disappoint' and pedobear pics anywhere else than there. :s

Post by **Blindfire** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:14 pm

ofy1993 wrote:
Thee_UniQue wrote:Fat woman, I do not like.

according to Silo, then you would also have to remove thin women.

OH GOD THE HORROR! MAKE THEM STOPPPPPPPPP!!!

OR, that means you remove anorexic women, leave the non-toothpicks.

Azilius · Post by **Azilius** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:22 pm

This must be Nuclears weekly trolling...

Ashikiheyun · Post by **Ashikiheyun** » Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:29 pm

Azilius wrote:This must be Nuclears weekly trolling...

Yup.

NuclearSilo · Post by **NuclearSilo** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:55 am

SwordCloud wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:
SwordCloud wrote:Nuclear and his logics . . .

Removing something and his opposite?If you remove Violence You can't remove the peace,
IF you remove the peace you can't remove the violence,if you remove life and dead,then we lives or we are all deads?I will never undertand your logic because you don't think the same way as many of member including me think.

simply add the word "not/no" to the word you remove, you'll understand
live - not live (dead)
dead - not dead (live)
peace - no peace (war, violence, etc...)

you remove life and death, you are neither living or dying

Then if you don't live and you're not dead what are you?
This have no sense for me,you can't remove the both things,could you tell me how this can have a sense?

That's the point. If you can't remove, it means that you can't remove, nuf said. So you got to find smt that could be removed and it gives the benefit for the world.

"Live" is to describe an organic still breathing, moving, organs works internally. "Dead" is the opposite. So smt could be neither live or dead could be an object non-organic for example. You can't say a "table is dead" nor "living"

DarkJackal · Post by **DarkJackal** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:07 am

I can say a table is dead I think, it use to be a tree didn't it? So its technically the dead corpse of a once living organism :3.

Blurred · Post by **Blurred** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:51 am

I would love to remove posting rights, so now no one can post in this confusing thread!

Mirosuke · Post by **Mirosuke** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:53 am

sorry but i agree with silo

dont kill me pls.

name something that has not opposite?

rek · Post by **rek** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:15 am

This thread would have been fun if OP wasn't so serious.

NuclearSilo · Post by **NuclearSilo** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:24 am

DarkJackal wrote:I can say a table is dead I think, it use to be a tree didn't it? So its technically the dead corpse of a once living organism :3.

No one says that except you

Life and death apply only on organic object. They are are tied together. If you remove life or death, you might also remove organic object as well. Which mean you remove your own existence. Or in another word, you transform yourself into a non-organic thing. You can't move, can't talk, can't hear like a table

Squirt wrote:So with your logic your saying theres an anti- universe?

Probably. If the universe contains everything. Who says there isn't a "-verse" which contains nothing?

SM-Count · Post by **SM-Count** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:30 am

rek wrote:This thread would have been fun if OP wasn't so serious.

Srsly, chill the **** out ppls. Just ignore the all caps large text in bold in OP, god knows OTL is supposed to only read title and then post, not actually read the OP.

I'd remove AIDS, and it's opposite, non-AIDS people; so we're left with people who had AIDS but now don't anymore. It's like they've been given a second chance at life, what will they do with it? Get herpes? Great reality show. I dunno, I was discussing this over dinner, it was srs business.

Squirt · Post by **Squirt** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:56 am

NuclearSilo wrote:Probably. If the universe contains everything. Who says there isn't a "-verse" which contains nothing?

If there was a verse that contained nothing then it wouldn't exist.
All these anti materials we think of are just a figment of our HUMAN imaginations.

Blurred · Post by **Blurred** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:01 am

Squirt wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:Probably. If the universe contains everything. Who says there isn't a "-verse" which contains nothing?

If there was a verse that contained nothing then it wouldn't exist.
All these anti materials we think of are just a figment of our HUMAN imaginations.

The universe came from nothing anyways.

Squirt · Post by **Squirt** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:06 am

Blurred wrote:
Squirt wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:Probably. If the universe contains everything. Who says there isn't a "-verse" which contains nothing?

If there was a verse that contained nothing then it wouldn't exist.
All these anti materials we think of are just a figment of our HUMAN imaginations.

The universe came from nothing anyways.

So if a universe was created in the verse that had nothing, would our universe seize to exist to satisfy the positive/negative rule?

Or would the energy from our universe be used to "power" the other universe, I.E our material travels to other universe and the "nothing" is really our universe.

NuclearSilo · Post by **NuclearSilo** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:17 am

Squirt wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:Probably. If the universe contains everything. Who says there isn't a "-verse" which contains nothing?

If there was a verse that contained nothing then it wouldn't exist.
All these anti materials we think of are just a figment of our HUMAN imaginations.

Yes, it doesn't materially exists in a way...
You can think about the opposite of the Big Bang. It's a dot infinitely small you could ever imagine 1exp(-∞). Nothing exists in that antiverse but the verse exists itself.

Squirt wrote:So if a universe was created in the verse that had nothing, would our universe seize to exist to satisfy the positive/negative rule?

Or would the energy from our universe be used to "power" the other universe, I.E our material travels to other universe and the "nothing" is really our universe.

What?

TheSpy · Post by **TheSpy** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:28 am

I'd remove politicians. Why? At least in our country the current president cares only about himself and can't even raise the minimal monthly salary from 450€ to 600€. When they asked him, 'Could you get through the month with 450€?' he didn't even reply, because for him it would be nearly impossible.

There you have your why. the opposite is non-politicians, so that would basically wipe out the whole human kind, right? <3

TheDrop · Post by **TheDrop** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:38 am

TheSpy wrote:I'd remove politicians. Why? At least in our country the current president cares only about himself and can't even raise the minimal monthly salary from 450€ to 600€. When they asked him, 'Could you get through the month with 450€?' he didn't even reply, because for him it would be nearly impossible.

There you have your why. the opposite is non-politicians, so that would basically wipe out the whole human kind, right? <3

well to be fair, getting through a month w/ $600 (thats 450€ right) would be hard for a normal person, atleast here in the states.
anyways, removing politicians = anarchism

NuclearSilo · Post by **NuclearSilo** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:42 am

euh, politic is important, it's what decide if one country should have war or peace with another country

Squirt · Post by **Squirt** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:44 am

NuclearSilo wrote:
Squirt wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:Probably. If the universe contains everything. Who says there isn't a "-verse" which contains nothing?

If there was a verse that contained nothing then it wouldn't exist.
All these anti materials we think of are just a figment of our HUMAN imaginations.

Yes, it doesn't materially exists in a way...
You can think about the opposite of the Big Bang. It's a dot infinitely small you could ever imagine 1exp(-∞). Nothing exists in that antiverse but the verse exists itself.

Nothing exist with in that verse, would it still be in our dimension?Or timeline?

vietxboy911 · Post by **vietxboy911** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:57 am

I think you are being too serious in this topic, and that it might get locked soon.

Miguez · Post by **Miguez** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:10 am

After reading this page...

NuclearSilo · Post by **NuclearSilo** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:19 am

vietxboy911 wrote:I think you are being too serious in this topic, and that it might get locked soon.

That's right. It's bad to be too serious

. We need to tell jokes every time, right?
The forum rule said you can't post smt serious

Miguez · Post by **Miguez** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:31 am

NuclearSilo wrote:
vietxboy911 wrote:I think you are being too serious in this topic, and that it might get locked soon.

That's right. It's bad to be too serious . We need to tell jokes every time, right?
The forum rule said you can't post smt serious

w
t
f

Kirkaldi · Post by **Kirkaldi** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:56 am

I would remove you, Silo, and your opposite is your spouse or boyfriend or girlfriend. Whatever you are, you are REMOVED. Bye bye.

NuclearSilo · Post by **NuclearSilo** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:06 am

Hahahaha, if you remove me, who would let you taste the fun of spiritual stuffs bring to this forum?

Ashikiheyun · Post by **Ashikiheyun** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:32 am

I would remove darkness, and therefore light. WHAT IS LEFT NOW?!

Silkroad Online Forums

If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world

Re: If you can remove one thing from the world