What classes do the highest damage and lowest?

[iscared]

Can someone make me a list from top damage dealer to lowest damage dealer. Euro & Chinese please.

[Sir_Edward]

thats quite a task your asking there but ill take a stab at it.

euro wiz
euro rouge
euro warrior
chin bow
chin spear
chin glavie/glauvl... however you spell it
euro warlock
chin s/s sword
chin s/s blade
euro bard
euro cleric

i think thats all of them. note that is is only on attack power and not defense.

[-.-]

euro cleric (offering)
euro wiz
euro rouge (damage buffs on)
euro warrior
euro rouge (damage buffs off)
euro bard
chin spear
chin bow (int)
chin bow (str with crits)
chin glavie (with crits)
euro warlock (with debuffs)
chin s/s sword
chin glavie (no crits)
chin bow (str no crits)
chin blade (with debuffs)
euro warlock (no debuffs)
chin blade (no debuffs)

well i added a few conditions in, and moved some of them around... and assumes you are using the cookie cutter masteries lol, Also moved warlock up on list because I counted dots+nuke as 1 attack (I did same with bard's attack chain lol) because I went by damage in time for a set of attacks, and not any single attack

single attack with consistent damage (so not counting crits or debuffs ) but counted buffs on rogue because its only one that really changes places, wiz buff/none is still at top, chinese buffs arent going to vary damage as much since all chinese can use same ones:
cleric
wiz
rogue (buff on)
warrior
rogue (buff off)
spear
bow (int)
s/s
bow
galvie
bard
warlock
blade

edit: its interesting because aside from bard (well without seeing what sub is) the defense list from most to least is nearly exact opposite , well not that surprising but people forget that you give up def for power, or power for def and want a char that is best in both. :d

[pr0klobster]

Both previous posts are pretty close. If you don't mind my adding something to clarify:

1st poster is avg damage (imho)
2nd poster listed kind of MAX damage. Of course a cleric cannot consistently deal nearly as much as even a warrior or a bard. Their nukes are too slow.

[iscared]

Thanks but doesn't euro bard beat bladers in overall damage?

[karimgh]

No i dont think so.
If they did, Then why werent they been used as MAIN dmg delears class?
And no BLADER are from the best classes in PVP at high lvls at 60+ Or so.
While bards are only for buffs

[iscared]

No i dont think so.
If they did, Then why werent they been used as MAIN dmg delears class?
And no BLADER are from the best classes in PVP at high lvls at 60+ Or so.
While bards are only for buffs

Bladers are only better at pvp then bard because they can tank that's all, and maybe knock down.

[karimgh]

Well there are many reasons for this:
1-Bladers can KD then hit while on the ground
2-Block
3-HELL ALOT OF HP
4-Bards cant 1 hit kill and so does the Blader.
5-In that case, we will need block,and alot of HP.
6-Bards can be one hit dead !!!

So i prefer to make a bard as a sub class for anything (for buffs) and make the main class any of the DMG dealers

[iscared]

Well i'm talking about the average character. I don't really care what character can block and stuff considering in PVE bards have noise so there basically protected from all monsters except Champions and Giants.

Bards can also 1 hit alot of people..

[pr0klobster]

No i dont think so.
If they did, Then why werent they been used as MAIN dmg delears class?
And no BLADER are from the best classes in PVP at high lvls at 60+ Or so.
While bards are only for buffs

Er, no.

Bards are not 1v1 pvp, that's true, but try them out in a party pvp sometime. At high levels tambours can give you 40%+ dmg absorption and nice 110% swing march.

I don't think anyone has ever compared a blader's dmg to a bard. Bards might do more dmg than a blader, but blader w/ chains and statuses has more hits.

[Ownage]

Bards do about as much dmg as pure int s/s nuker. They attk quick so they can attk more in a small amount of time and end up doing more dmg.