View on the Exposed Botters?

Anything related to Silkroad Online Forums. Report problems and bugs, or ask questions. Discuss latest features and additions.
User avatar
RuYi
Ex-Staff
Posts: 7145
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 7:39 am
Location: Done.

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by RuYi »

I'd love to lock it, Priam, but at this moment, I don't really care any more.
Let them cry and whine, who knows what they can achieve with such behaviour.

Everything I did, and with me the others who were in favour of EB, it seems like it's no longer important, like I am a nuisance, like a destroyer to the forum, the ideal, I'm so hard trying to keep up.

EB was born as a last thing to hold onto for the legits. Because nobody else cared. Because on other places, bots were supported and legits were laughed at. Joymax never gave a damn, so we could have taken the easy way and go along with that. But we decided not to, we decided to go take the harder way, to support those who want to play the game the way it should be played. The way it was meant to be played.

There's no other section where shit hits the fan as it does in Exposed Botters.
But if it makes a difference, even if it's for one person in the world, it's worth it.

But I'm tired. I'm really, really tired.
And I'm tempted to turn around and walk away when I see replies like these here.

So keep it coming. Keep crying and whining until it reaches a limit where ideals are forgotten, the EB is closed, and I can resign.
Image

User avatar
Priam
Forum Legend
Posts: 7885
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:38 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: At the apple store, Cause i'm an iAddict.

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Priam »

Well, if you put it that way, sure.

Still, it seems rather pointless and potentially harmfull to let these people ramble on about a matter that has been subject to discussion before. A matter on which SRF has taken an official stance, several times.
Image

User avatar
Fury
Loyal Member
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:53 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: GuildWars2

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Fury »

Just leave it the way it is. I think that if we get rid of the EB section, there will be no order within these forums and it will die. We obviously have some caring mods here that put in the effort to keep this place the way it is. Keep the EB section, remain legit, and anyone who doesnt like the rules are welcome to leave!
Image

User avatar
Mirosuke
Forum Legend
Posts: 6735
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:30 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Love the way you are.

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Mirosuke »

Priam wrote:Where is thou red name, ryoko. It's confusing me!

Yeah, i was thinking the same. :?


RuYi wrote:I'd love to lock it, Priam, but at this moment, I don't really care any more.
Let them cry and whine, who knows what they can achieve with such behaviour.

But I'm tired. I'm really, really tired.
And I'm tempted to turn around and walk away when I see replies like these here.

So keep it coming. Keep crying and whining until it reaches a limit where ideals are forgotten, the EB is closed, and I can resign.

Don't push yourself. :d
You know, this is like all of those senseless topics have been locked about ilegal stuffs. Just with a little 'positive' dialogue.

And yeah, if you mean to "let them cry" for those who are againts EB, i agree.
There's nothing more to do than let them a little time of "i'm going to make a change". Until they're going agressive and it's when you have to use your magic words.
( ๏̯͡ ๏ ) ~
Hwang Mi Hee(L)
あなた運命を全うする
ImageImageImage
WE WANT [ TORCHLIGHT II], [TERA ONLINE], [BLADE&SOUL] AND... [DIABLO III].


~* Old Sigs *~
[x][x][x][x]

User avatar
Ryoko
Site Owner
Posts: 6390
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:32 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic
Contact:

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Ryoko »

Mirosuke wrote:
Priam wrote:Where is thou red name, ryoko. It's confusing me!

Yeah, i was thinking the same. :?


Fox thinks it should be blue. I kinda agree. I like that.

User avatar
Priam
Forum Legend
Posts: 7885
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:38 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: At the apple store, Cause i'm an iAddict.

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Priam »

Orange maybe? ;)
Image

User avatar
bakafish
Veteran Member
Posts: 3358
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:47 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: EU-Kor'gall

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by bakafish »

I believe Goseki is at the wrong forums. WoW class forums is over there --->
Image

User avatar
Zypher
Forum God
Posts: 8705
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 11:41 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Canada

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Zypher »

Ryoko wrote:
Mirosuke wrote:
Priam wrote:Where is thou red name, ryoko. It's confusing me!

Yeah, i was thinking the same. :?


Fox thinks it should be blue. I kinda agree. I like that.

i like that

User avatar
Doppleganger
Addicted Member
Posts: 2706
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 8:58 am
Location: Resistance Headquarters

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Doppleganger »

Ryoko wrote:
Mirosuke wrote:
Priam wrote:Where is thou red name, ryoko. It's confusing me!

Yeah, i was thinking the same. :?


Fox thinks it should be blue. I kinda agree. I like that.

no no no each letter should be a different color!
ImageImage
Image

User avatar
Karras
Active Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:29 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: alps

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Karras »

Goseki, perhaps you should add a poll.
<< banned from srf for proof of botting. -cin >>

User avatar
Priam
Forum Legend
Posts: 7885
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:38 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: At the apple store, Cause i'm an iAddict.

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Priam »

Karras wrote:Goseki, perhaps you should add a poll.


Yes, that would be good, so you could lose your arguement on both fronts.
Image

User avatar
CrimsonNuker
Dom's Slut
Posts: 13791
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 3:31 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: guildwars2

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by CrimsonNuker »

Ryoko wrote:
Mirosuke wrote:
Priam wrote:Where is thou red name, ryoko. It's confusing me!

Yeah, i was thinking the same. :?


Fox thinks it should be blue. I kinda agree. I like that.


Can I has a colored naem? CrimsonNuker

Or a new title? :wink: I'll let you pick what it is
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Blindfire
Site Contributor
Posts: 3843
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:36 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: ...

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Blindfire »

I find it hilarious that Lempi has added remove EB to his sig, even though he claims this forum doesn't ban botters well enough.

User avatar
Karras
Active Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:29 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: alps

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Karras »

Priam wrote:Yes, that would be good, so you could lose your arguement on both fronts.

As u haven't notice, there was already a poll which was locked on the first say.
Results were that 69% ppl want it scrapped.
Have a look yourself.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=112635&p=1559293&hilit=SCRAP+EXPOSE+BOTTERS#p1559293
<< banned from srf for proof of botting. -cin >>

User avatar
Blindfire
Site Contributor
Posts: 3843
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:36 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: ...

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Blindfire »

50 of 25956 want it scrapped. In total 72 of 25956 voted. That poll was not an accurate representation of what the people want, it was what 50 insignificant members want. The 50 of you can leave, all we will notice is less QQ.

User avatar
Karras
Active Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:29 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: alps

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Karras »

Blindfire wrote:50 of 25956 want it scrapped. In total 72 of 25956 voted. That poll was not an accurate representation of what the people want, it was what 50 insignificant members want. The 50 of you can leave, all we will notice is less QQ.


Theres no argument here, the poll didnt get the chance to show us what the members really want.
However, it does show sign that more want EB off SRF.
<< banned from srf for proof of botting. -cin >>

User avatar
Priam
Forum Legend
Posts: 7885
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:38 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: At the apple store, Cause i'm an iAddict.

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Priam »

Karras wrote:
Priam wrote:Yes, that would be good, so you could lose your arguement on both fronts.

As u haven't notice, there was already a poll which was locked on the first say.
Results were that 69% ppl want it scrapped.
Have a look yourself.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=112635&p=1559293&hilit=SCRAP+EXPOSE+BOTTERS#p1559293


As you probably haven't noticed, i've been on this forum quite a while longer then you.

Which means i've seen all the ups and downs.

Which means i've seen this board before EB (Hell), and after.

Which means i've seen these sorts of topics quite a few times now.

Which means i've heard all your arguements before.

Which means your nothing new, and you'll probably keep whining untill you get a ban yourself, others have before you.

Which means you're not the new EB messiah, you're just some random chump whom thinks he's got it all covered.

Which means, nothing will change, SRF has an official stance, and you, if you hate it that much, need to f*ck off to some other board.

And your poll, well. This is a privately owned board. There are no democratic rights here. And the owner just so happens to hate botters. Go figure. Your poll has no rights.
Image

User avatar
[SD]Master_Wong
Forum God
Posts: 9509
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:02 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Plymouth, University

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by [SD]Master_Wong »

Priam wrote:
Karras wrote:
Priam wrote:Yes, that would be good, so you could lose your arguement on both fronts.

As u haven't notice, there was already a poll which was locked on the first say.
Results were that 69% ppl want it scrapped.
Have a look yourself.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=112635&p=1559293&hilit=SCRAP+EXPOSE+BOTTERS#p1559293


As you probably haven't noticed, i've been on this forum quite a while longer then you.

Which means i've seen all the ups and downs.

Which means i've seen this board before EB (Hell), and after.

Which means i've seen these sorts of topics quite a few times now.

Which means i've heard all your arguements before.

Which means your nothing new, and you'll probably keep whining untill you get a ban yourself, others have before you.

Which means you're not the new EB messiah, you're just some random chump whom thinks he's got it all covered.

Which means, nothing will change, SRF has an official stance, and you, if you hate it that much, need to f*ck off to some other board.

And your poll, well. This is a privately owned board. There are no democratic rights here. And the owner just so happens to hate botters. Go figure. Your poll has no rights.


And i was a forum vet when you where a forum noobie xD

what i thought i was suppose to carry on...yeh ok this is kind of trolling now il stop and go back to my section
MaStEr
Image
credits zelzin ^^

User avatar
Karras
Active Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:29 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: alps

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Karras »

Priam wrote:As you probably haven't noticed, i've been on this forum quite a while longer then you.

Don't b so sure.

Priam wrote:Which means you're not the new EB messiah, you're just some random chump whom thinks he's got it all covered.

Sounds familiar much? U sure sounds like u had everything covered.

Priam wrote:And your poll, well. This is a privately owned board. There are no democratic rights here. And the owner just so happens to hate botters. Go figure. Your poll has no rights.

Where did i say abt members' rights?

So much hate, have a chill pill...

If u dont like what i do, mayb u the "great ol one" should set a model n change ur sig.
<< banned from srf for proof of botting. -cin >>

User avatar
Blindfire
Site Contributor
Posts: 3843
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:36 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: ...

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Blindfire »

Crumpets wasn't banned for botting, Priam wanting him unbanned is
irrelevant to this discussion.

User avatar
Karras
Active Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:29 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: alps

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Karras »

Blindfire wrote:Crumpets wasn't banned for botting, Priam wanting him unbanned is
irrelevant to this discussion.


I wasn't referring to the bot part, but rather the fact that both of us place what we want in our sig.

Priam wrote:... nothing will change, SRF has an official stance, and you, if you hate it that much, need to f*ck off to some other board...
<< banned from srf for proof of botting. -cin >>

User avatar
Blindfire
Site Contributor
Posts: 3843
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:36 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: ...

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Blindfire »

The difference is, he isn't making several topics to try to get his way.

User avatar
Priam
Forum Legend
Posts: 7885
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:38 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: At the apple store, Cause i'm an iAddict.

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Priam »

Karras wrote:Don't b so sure.


Your joindate speaks against you. Yes, i know you'll now try and say you we're here 2 years before joining. And it'll be bullshit.

Karras wrote:Sounds familiar much? U sure sounds like u had everything covered.


I have a right to, since i've been around to see both sides of the story.

Karras wrote:Where did i say abt members' rights?


You're whining about a poll being locked, sounds familliar?

Karras wrote:So much hate, have a chill pill...

If u dont like what i do, mayb u the "great ol one" should set a model n change ur sig.


Crumpets is a total different story. Which is why i'll just leave my sig as it is? k?

He should have been here though, Would make this topic a lot more fun. Or end it quicker.
Image

User avatar
M3K0S
Loyal Member
Posts: 1580
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:32 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Azteca

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by M3K0S »

it doesnt matter if its a different story... he got banned for breaking the rules right?
same as the botters that visit this website... so it would help u look less bad if u took that out of ur sig...
ImageImage
i love you magisuns thx for the sig

User avatar
Priam
Forum Legend
Posts: 7885
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:38 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: At the apple store, Cause i'm an iAddict.

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Priam »

M3K0S wrote:it doesnt matter if its a different story... he got banned for breaking the rules right?
same as the botters that visit this website... so it would help u look less bad if u took that out of ur sig...


My reputation has always been one of a flaming asshole, how is taking it out of my sig gonna change that?

Anyways, i'm bad.

I've stated in several topics why it's in my sig, not gonna do the same hing again, lazy basterds, go dig it up.
Image

User avatar
M3K0S
Loyal Member
Posts: 1580
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:32 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Azteca

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by M3K0S »

so im wondering if ur a flaming asshole its just time till a mod gets tired of you just like crumpets and gets banned...
i can wait

EDIT: oh boy oh boy look what i found... copypasta tiem nao

* 5) Be a constant problem. Flame in nearly every post. Accuse everyone who starts a topic of being a bot. Spam ridiculous nonsense at any opportunity. Do stupid things to intentionally a) piss off the mod team or b) piss off another forum member. Inflate your post count with garbage. Post disturbing, inappropriate, or NSFW (not safe for work) images in threads, avatars, sigs, etc. If you intentionally make more work for us, you'll find yourself banned.


***IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW LONG YOU'VE BEEN A MEMBER HERE. IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW MANY POSTS YOU HAVE. IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE IN YOUR CIRCLE OF FRIENDS. IF YOU DO THESE THINGS, YOU ARE GONE. END OF STORY.***

hes not getting unbanned... lol
ImageImage
i love you magisuns thx for the sig

User avatar
Priam
Forum Legend
Posts: 7885
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:38 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: At the apple store, Cause i'm an iAddict.

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Priam »

Meh, it wasn't even that bad. Thanks for finding it though, I was looking for that.

Anyways. I'm talking one person. Whom I believe has done nothing remotely close. If you'd like to discuss my signature any further, create a topic about it.

In this topic, we're talking deleting an entire section that's only brought respect and good to SRF. There's a slight difference.
Image

User avatar
William-CL
Forum Legend
Posts: 7363
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:10 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: N/A

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by William-CL »

Are people really still complaining about EB? I like it, if it wasn't for that, There would be a lot of topics for mods to purge. About bots, who's a Bot, why not be a bot, why be a bot. Keep IT!
Image

User avatar
M3K0S
Loyal Member
Posts: 1580
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:32 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Azteca

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by M3K0S »

every single person makes a difference...
its like when u have 1000 dollars and u spend a dollar thinking "oh its only a dollar" so u go on spending dollar by dollar until u have none left... then ur like WTF happen to my 1000 dollars! lol
this is sorta the same... its gonna be the first of many... so unban all... or unban none!
thx

EDIT:: if the botters do get unbanned, i can bet ANYBODY that more than half of them wont even bother of thinking of this website...even if they are unbanned.... loll
ImageImage
i love you magisuns thx for the sig

User avatar
Karras
Active Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:29 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: alps

Re: View on the Exposed Botters?

Post by Karras »

@Priam
I am not arguing with you.
I've shared what i wanted to.
Apparently u don't even get what I was trying to deliver.
And, i've never whine abt my poll getting locked. Check again if you're unsure.

Abt the join date thingy, thats not exactly what i had in mind. But... i guess the smarter would've known what i was hinting.
<< banned from srf for proof of botting. -cin >>

Locked

Return to “Site Discussion”