This forum is a cesspool of grammar mistakes. It is pointless to sit here and try to correct every single one.
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
Though this ugly sentence is easily comprehensible, it is irrelevant, as the issue is
grammar, which, not only arguably excludes spelling, but also relies on the order in which words are presented, as well as the matter in which they are presented.
This will not work.
Will this not work?
Notice, the first is a statement in which the explanation of the possibility of something succeeding is dismissed, whereas the other asks if the possibility of something succeeding can be dismissed. To further the example, we can then purposely make a mistake by "innocently" replacing the question mark with a period, thus only adding to the confusion.
Will this not work.Now, watch the first sentence and how the meaning then changes again when made into a question.
This will not work?Which is now questioning someone's previous statement, whereas it could have been interpreted as agreement with a period.
Also, though your example works, that person looks profoundly stupid, and, like word choice, this presentation will probably effect the gravity of your point in the human mind.