A letter from GameGuard

A place for general discussion about Silkroad Online. Talk about the game or ask questions. Please keep threads Silkroad Online related.
User avatar
.curve
Elite Member
Posts: 5167
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 9:59 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Antelope Valley, CA

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by .curve »

makanudo wrote:
aznshadow wrote:
They don't say anywhere that GameGuard will work in game. They splash the logo, allowing you to see that it's there. Not necessarily that it's working.


By displaying the GameGuard logo, they are stating they are USING the GameGuard client itself. By displaying the logo and not actually including the GameGuard is fraudulent use of products. It's like buying a computer with AVG Anti-Virus but it only displays the logo for AVG, without actually having the real thing implemented making it seem as though AVG's product is a piece of shit.



This.


Interpret it how you want. They don't explicitly state that GameGuard will be active.

Edit:
Sure, that logo is pretty suggestive. They also suggested that they would take a firm stance against bots. That they were continually doing their best to ensure a smooth gaming experience. Wait...
Speak the truth, even if your voice shakes.
Image

User avatar
makanudo
New Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 10:12 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Mexico baby

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by makanudo »

Yeah and maybe they are trying but if gameguard is not active and they are advertising it as if it was then its pretty much fraud

User avatar
duhovnik
Casual Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:13 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Pluto

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by duhovnik »

you could have asked what they want to do with it :!:
2H Sword / cleric on Pluto. Level 82 and stopped
Wizzard / Cleric on Pluto. Level 46 and very slowly creeping towards the next level

Image

User avatar
iscared
Active Member
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:11 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Azteca

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by iscared »

Sleepy wrote:They sound as incompetent and clueless as JoyMax to me...

Why would they ask you to send them files lol? Surely such a company would know what they provide or at least download the client to check...

Joymax could of editted the GG files, then canceled the subscription of GG, meaning they got a free anti hack..

but um..this will bring peoples FPS up a little because GG does run in the backround with a little MU being used.
Image
signature made by jaksje

User avatar
dorkus
Common Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:52 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Hercules

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by dorkus »

so basically EVERYONE else knew silkroad was using a fake GameGuard EXCEPT for the people that make GameGuard?

i just assumed they didnt care. im sure joymax pays them to use their name anyway, and thats all it is really about in the end.
Image

Launger
Common Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:34 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Maya

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by Launger »

Joymax is in a stalemate now, if they accept gameguards client, it will easily block the bot programs, but then joymax will lose bots. So we have to hope, that joymax finally understands, that real players are worth more tha bots, accepts gameguard and we have a happy ending.

OR it keeps ignoring GG and then isro will be full of bots, and everyone will migrate to esro.

User avatar
TheKnight
Veteran Member
Posts: 3067
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 5:11 pm
Location: leagueoflegends

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by TheKnight »

Launger wrote:Joymax is in a stalemate now, if they accept gameguards client, it will easily block the bot programs, but then joymax will lose bots. So we have to hope, that joymax finally understands, that real players are worth more tha bots, accepts gameguard and we have a happy ending.

OR it keeps ignoring GG and then isro will be full of bots, and everyone will migrate to esro.

And What will happend when there is only bots in iSro? and escro is full of players?
Image

Image
League of Legends EUW - Summoner Name: Th3Knight

User avatar
CeLL
Senior Member
Posts: 4441
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by CeLL »

NuclearSilo wrote:Uhm, if they bought the license but don't use it is kinda weird. Greedy like JM won't let the money down the drain for nothing.

yeah your right, the spoil ***k botters that buy the **** out of silk make them way less money than what they spend on game guard.
Image
^^Thanks Thomas42

User avatar
Bleederi
Casual Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:21 am
Quick Reply: Yes

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by Bleederi »

I say FRAUD. Just want to see what is coming up...

User avatar
BloodyBlade
Elite Member
Posts: 5219
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:32 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Attending your mothers sexual needs :)

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by BloodyBlade »

there is no gameguard in csro and vsro.
Oh and wait, you can log in first try.
My sig died

User avatar
HawaiianMix
Active Member
Posts: 786
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:25 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Ksro

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by HawaiianMix »

CeLL wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:Uhm, if they bought the license but don't use it is kinda weird. Greedy like JM won't let the money down the drain for nothing.

yeah your right, the spoil ***k botters that buy the **** out of silk make them way less money than what they spend on game guard.


I like the list of characters you have in your signature. :P
Image Image Image

User avatar
PR0METHEUS
Senior Member
Posts: 4093
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:30 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by PR0METHEUS »

Karras wrote:
Could you please tell me which game you are playing since we are providing our solutions to many different games that Joymax services?

Is it Silkroad or DarkEden?


This statement is enough proof that JM is paying GG for its solution on SRO.
Which means, JM is entitled to put the logo of GG in SRO.
Use it or not, its their choice.
JM don't answer to GG, GG answer to JM.


Well even if you pay for a license, I'd think you shouldn't be able to use their logos without using their software. I'm sure Microsoft would have a problem if some company bought a corporate license for Windows Vista, then threw the "Windows" name and logos up onto some other OS to make it look like Windows.

Would Symantec have a problem with OEM vendors putting the yellow shield icon (the one for Symantec Antivirus client) into the system tray of all computers the vendor sells? Of course assuming the yellow shield icon also had the tooltip "Symantec Antivirus Client" when you hover the mouse over it.

Seems it's the same thing with GameGuard. If the GG client is not really running, Joymax shouldn't claim it is, even if they have a license.
Missing the good times in SRO... :love:

SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)

User avatar
CeLL
Senior Member
Posts: 4441
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by CeLL »

HawaiianMix wrote:
CeLL wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:Uhm, if they bought the license but don't use it is kinda weird. Greedy like JM won't let the money down the drain for nothing.

yeah your right, the spoil ***k botters that buy the **** out of silk make them way less money than what they spend on game guard.


I like the list of characters you have in your signature. :P

wanna old hands??
Image
^^Thanks Thomas42

User avatar
HawaiianMix
Active Member
Posts: 786
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:25 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Ksro

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by HawaiianMix »

CeLL wrote:
HawaiianMix wrote:
I like the list of characters you have in your signature. :P

wanna old hands??


You know I do, you hot and single, sexy individual. Now give me a character. :P
Image Image Image

User avatar
chesticles
Loyal Member
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 1:41 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic
Contact:

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by chesticles »

waits for GameGuard action oO
Image
Image


Want to play Jade Dynasty and get a bunch of free stuff?
In USA-East, The Billows
My Inductor ID is 8390004X080400090002522Z0d21fe
Copy that code and paste it in the box when you make a new character.

User avatar
g859
Casual Member
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 7:52 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: United States

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by g859 »

Here's my email to Joymax a while back on gameguard:

Image

Good thing I kept it in my inbox :D

*EDIT* Emailed the same person as in the OP's post, Jay, and wrote a lengthy email building on what was said in the first post. Hopefully they can beat some sense into Joymax!

User avatar
NuclearSilo
Forum God
Posts: 8834
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:00 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Age of Wushu

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by NuclearSilo »

they are automated email response, nothing to wonder
Playing Age of Wushu, dota IMBA

User avatar
CeLL
Senior Member
Posts: 4441
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by CeLL »

HawaiianMix wrote:
CeLL wrote:
HawaiianMix wrote:
I like the list of characters you have in your signature. :P

wanna old hands??


You know I do, you hot and single, sexy individual. Now give me a character. :P

as soon as i actaully have one of them, then ill give it to you.
Image
^^Thanks Thomas42

User avatar
Sharp324
Senior Member
Posts: 4383
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:24 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by Sharp324 »

Launger wrote:Joymax is in a stalemate now, if they accept gameguards client, it will easily block the bot programs, but then joymax will lose bots. So we have to hope, that joymax finally understands, that real players are worth more tha bots, accepts gameguard and we have a happy ending.

OR it keeps ignoring GG and then isro will be full of bots, and everyone will migrate to esro.


Gameguard sucks worse than PunkBuster. It definitely wouldnt last long. Even script kiddies can get by gameguard easily.
------------------------------

User avatar
BuDo
Senior Member
Posts: 4714
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:16 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Xian

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by BuDo »

And this is why I've debating religiously that JM is to be blame for all the botting that takes place in SRO. They literally open the gates for all the people who are willing to bot. If they are truly using the gameguard logo without actually using the program to stop illegal 3rd party software then this is proof they are responsible 100%.
Image

_________________________________________________
BOW Full STR Fire level 102 -- ON A LONG BREAK..POSSIBLY FOREVER

User avatar
NuclearSilo
Forum God
Posts: 8834
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:00 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Age of Wushu

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by NuclearSilo »

BuDo wrote:And this is why I've debating religiously that JM is to be blame for all the botting that takes place in SRO. They literally open the gates for all the people who are willing to bot. If they are truly using the gameguard logo without actually using the program to stop illegal 3rd party software then this is proof they are responsible 100%.

Ok, so if they try to fix it by banning all your bot friends, your friends will quit and never play sro again right? Is that what you want?
Playing Age of Wushu, dota IMBA

User avatar
CeLL
Senior Member
Posts: 4441
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:26 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: SHEEKA JOOM BA BOOM BAH!! BAM! BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by CeLL »

NuclearSilo wrote:
BuDo wrote:And this is why I've debating religiously that JM is to be blame for all the botting that takes place in SRO. They literally open the gates for all the people who are willing to bot. If they are truly using the gameguard logo without actually using the program to stop illegal 3rd party software then this is proof they are responsible 100%.

Ok, so if they try to fix it by banning all your bot friends, your friends will quit and never play sro again right? Is that what you want?

hmmm, i dont like who this comment is supporting.

also, hacking and 3rd party prevention doesnt HAVE to mean insta-ban, i can simply mean prevent the software from operating with sro. forcing legit play.
Image
^^Thanks Thomas42

User avatar
BuDo
Senior Member
Posts: 4714
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:16 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Xian

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by BuDo »

NuclearSilo wrote:
BuDo wrote:And this is why I've debating religiously that JM is to be blame for all the botting that takes place in SRO. They literally open the gates for all the people who are willing to bot. If they are truly using the gameguard logo without actually using the program to stop illegal 3rd party software then this is proof they are responsible 100%.

Ok, so if they try to fix it by banning all your bot friends, your friends will quit and never play sro again right? Is that what you want?


Yes indeed...ban all the bots including my bot friends and I'd be happy. I know that some of my friends would then make a new but legit account after that anyways.
Image

_________________________________________________
BOW Full STR Fire level 102 -- ON A LONG BREAK..POSSIBLY FOREVER

User avatar
Amarisa
Senior Member
Posts: 4049
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Magic

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by Amarisa »

NuclearSilo wrote:
BuDo wrote:And this is why I've debating religiously that JM is to be blame for all the botting that takes place in SRO. They literally open the gates for all the people who are willing to bot. If they are truly using the gameguard logo without actually using the program to stop illegal 3rd party software then this is proof they are responsible 100%.

Ok, so if they try to fix it by banning all your bot friends, your friends will quit and never play sro again right? Is that what you want?


you underestimate the addiction young one.....
Image

User avatar
jabbers
Loyal Member
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:15 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: la revolucion

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by jabbers »

Launger wrote:Joymax is in a stalemate now, if they accept gameguards client, it will easily block the bot programs, but then joymax will lose bots. So we have to hope, that joymax finally understands, that real players are more troublesome than bots, accepts gameguard and we have a happy ending.

OR it keeps ignoring GG and then isro will be full of bots, and everyone will migrate to esro.
Image

User avatar
Starrie
Frequent Member
Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 6:41 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Tibet

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by Starrie »

BuDo wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:
BuDo wrote:And this is why I've debating religiously that JM is to be blame for all the botting that takes place in SRO. They literally open the gates for all the people who are willing to bot. If they are truly using the gameguard logo without actually using the program to stop illegal 3rd party software then this is proof they are responsible 100%.

Ok, so if they try to fix it by banning all your bot friends, your friends will quit and never play sro again right? Is that what you want?


Yes indeed...ban all the bots including my bot friends and I'd be happy. I know that some of my friends would then make a new but legit account after that anyways.

There will be one problem, all servers will be empty except for the few legits, maybe 100, each server still has, so there is no jobbing, pvping, no items to buy, etc. Before all bots are legitly d8-10 again, we are about half a year further.
Image
Thnx cin for sig & Hershey for avy :)

User avatar
TheDrop
Forum Legend
Posts: 7150
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:37 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: uefa2012

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by TheDrop »

Starrie wrote:There will be one problem, all servers will be empty except for the few legits, maybe 100, each server still has, so there is no jobbing, pvping, no items to buy, etc. Before all bots are legitly d8-10 again, we are about half a year further.

Merge the servers. Though similar guild names/char names might be a lil tricky.
let it gooooo let it gooooOoOooOOOOOO

Let her suck my pistol
She open up her mouth and then I blow her brains out
Image

User avatar
Swindler
Forum God
Posts: 11256
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:49 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Pimpas Paradise.

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by Swindler »

UnbeatableDevil wrote:
Starrie wrote:There will be one problem, all servers will be empty except for the few legits, maybe 100, each server still has, so there is no jobbing, pvping, no items to buy, etc. Before all bots are legitly d8-10 again, we are about half a year further.

Merge the servers. Though similar guild names/char names might be a lil tricky.

Merge the guilds to :roll:

User avatar
TheDrop
Forum Legend
Posts: 7150
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:37 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: uefa2012

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by TheDrop »

HejsaN wrote:
UnbeatableDevil wrote:
Starrie wrote:There will be one problem, all servers will be empty except for the few legits, maybe 100, each server still has, so there is no jobbing, pvping, no items to buy, etc. Before all bots are legitly d8-10 again, we are about half a year further.

Merge the servers. Though similar guild names/char names might be a lil tricky.

Merge the guilds to :roll:

Merge the chars too then? :roll:
let it gooooo let it gooooOoOooOOOOOO

Let her suck my pistol
She open up her mouth and then I blow her brains out
Image

User avatar
NuclearSilo
Forum God
Posts: 8834
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:00 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Age of Wushu

Re: A letter from GameGuard

Post by NuclearSilo »

merge the item ID too
Playing Age of Wushu, dota IMBA

Post Reply

Return to “Silkroad General Discussion”