RedBlueGreen and others.

zShared · Post by **zShared** » Fri May 15, 2009 12:36 am

So I just read on another forum that RedBlueGreen got banned from here. All he said was because he was trying to help someone get unbanned... Why is he banned? What exactly did he do?
How many others are there that just get banned and I guess they just fade away until noone really remembers them? We know who gets banned in EB.. why shouldn't / can't we know who gets banned? :|
At least post the reason why under their names so if we see an old thread we would know..

_MvP_ · Post by **_MvP_** » Fri May 15, 2009 12:55 am

All the good people went from this forum...

NuclearSilo · Post by **NuclearSilo** » Fri May 15, 2009 12:56 am

I don't think so. If he is banned, he'd have a sig "banned..."

zShared · Post by **zShared** » Fri May 15, 2009 1:17 am

NuclearSilo wrote:I don't think so. If he is banned, he'd have a sig "banned..."

these people have been banned without it being in their sigs.. and this is just from what I remember.. I guess there's many more.

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=15757

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=38476

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=45294

notice the last visit.. and this thread on the other forum; http://forum.rev6.com/Silkroad-Online-G ... t3272.html

nohunta · Post by **nohunta** » Fri May 15, 2009 1:18 am

Meh SRF is falling.

Rip Tide · Post by **Rip Tide** » Fri May 15, 2009 1:41 am

Wow that sucks, didnt even notice him not around

Post by **Blindfire** » Fri May 15, 2009 1:50 am

Only SG, Ryoko or Key-J can edit signatures. The bans now are being down by global mods and they can't edit signatures.

selenne · Post by **selenne** » Fri May 15, 2009 2:00 am

well, amalie got banned and didnt get that sig too.

Hennessey · Post by **Hennessey** » Fri May 15, 2009 2:02 am

nohunta wrote:Meh SRF is falling.

selenne · Post by **selenne** » Fri May 15, 2009 2:30 am

Hennessey wrote:
nohunta wrote:Meh SRF is falling.

legits are falling.

now in olympus we're just enough to fill a guild up. maybe.

Insanity · Post by **Insanity** » Fri May 15, 2009 2:32 am

aww i liked RedBlueGreen and Mousetrap...

it might be time to reconsider the no-tolerance policy before this forum ends up like the tavern.

Sacchin · Post by **Sacchin** » Fri May 15, 2009 2:37 am

selenne wrote:legits are falling.

*sro and^

Mirosuke · Post by **Mirosuke** » Fri May 15, 2009 3:06 am

oh noezz...

Toshiharu · Post by **Toshiharu** » Fri May 15, 2009 3:14 am

If no one noticed, Red = _SomeOne_

Never mentioned anything, because I actually prefer having people on the forums... =/

fckerr · Post by **fckerr** » Fri May 15, 2009 4:09 am

That thread there is really interesting imo.

HawaiianMix · Post by **HawaiianMix** » Fri May 15, 2009 5:07 am

I don't know why you actually care. Majority of the people bot and if they get banned, they'll just make another account.

Doppleganger · Post by **Doppleganger** » Fri May 15, 2009 6:01 am

nohunta wrote:Meh SRF is falling.

Without a parachute
Code: Select all

_MvP_ · Post by **_MvP_** » Fri May 15, 2009 10:05 am

Insanity wrote:aww i liked RedBlueGreen and Mousetrap...

it might be time to reconsider the no-tolerance policy before this forum ends up like the tavern.

It will end up like tavern, mostly cuz of mods and theyre policy..

Toasty · Post by **Toasty** » Fri May 15, 2009 10:31 am

nohunta wrote:Meh SRF is falling.

Ah well, enjoy SRF while you still can.

SwordCloud · Post by **SwordCloud** » Fri May 15, 2009 10:42 am

I heard that the first guy pissed off a moderator,he got banned for that.
Now i think the mod was pissed off and Red defend the one who pissed off the mod,so I think everything is fine. :wink:

Puma60 · Post by **Puma60** » Fri May 15, 2009 10:43 am

I agree, SRF is falling. Right now this forums is close to dead. Roughly 2 topics a day started in General Discussion. Im sure it could have been 5+ a day if all those bots weren't banned. The Exposed Botters section ruined this forums. I couldn't name more than 5 legits players Lvl 90+ in Rome, the majority of legits being level 1-40 that havn't yet discovered the bot. It makes me wonder, how many members on this forums are actually legit like they say they are.

I can't find the topic, but earlier this month someone made a topic/poll asking how many people botted. If I can remember correctly, about 60% of these forums admitted to botting in the poll. Now imagine if you reached your goal of banning every botter on here. You would be left with about 40% of the community, most of which have quit already (just posting in Off Topic Lounge) or inexperienced low levels.

Anyway, this topic is most likely going to be locked sinces Mod's wont want to face the reality.

Toasty · Post by **Toasty** » Fri May 15, 2009 10:52 am

Puma60 wrote:I agree, SRF is falling. Right now this forums is close to dead. Roughly 2 topics a day started in General Discussion. Im sure it could have been 5+ a day if all those bots weren't banned. The Exposed Botters section ruined this forums. I couldn't name more than 5 legits players Lvl 90+ in Rome, the majority of legits being level 1-40 that havn't yet discovered the bot. It makes me wonder, how many members on this forums are actually legit like they say they are.

I can't find the topic, but earlier this month someone made a topic/poll asking how many people botted. If I can remember correctly, about 60% of these forums admitted to botting in the poll. Now imagine if you reached your goal of banning every botter on here. You would be left with about 40% of the community, most of which have quit already (just posting in Off Topic Lounge) or inexperienced low levels.

Anyway, this topic is most likely going to be locked sinces Mod's wont want to face the reality.

Barely anyone would be left. Most of the legits who do still play have already left for another forum or been banned.

The mods probably know they did wrong by making the EB, but they cant change their mind now. It was SRF's members fault anyway. We all asked for a way to punish bots, and we got it.

Rosato · Post by **Rosato** » Fri May 15, 2009 10:54 am

I like the idea of banning bots from the forums but banning people for saying there opinion or trying to get someone unbanned is just stupid. What kind of communist government is this?

AznFury · Post by **AznFury** » Fri May 15, 2009 11:04 am

Rosato wrote:I like the idea of banning bots from the forums but banning people for saying there opinion or trying to get someone unbanned is just stupid. What kind of communist government is this?

not a fun one?

_MvP_ · Post by **_MvP_** » Fri May 15, 2009 11:59 am

aznfury91 wrote:
Rosato wrote:I like the idea of banning bots from the forums but banning people for saying there opinion or trying to get someone unbanned is just stupid. What kind of communist government is this?

not a fun one?

Thats for sure.

RuYi · Post by **RuYi** » Fri May 15, 2009 12:37 pm

NuclearSilo wrote:I don't think so. If he is banned, he'd have a sig "banned..."

That was months ago, when SG was still active. There are plans for a 'banned' title for each banned member, but that might take a while.

For all you care bears, RedBlueGreen was banned because he posted someone else's account information.
We have a set or rules here, many of which YOU, the community, demanded, and now you got them.
Anyone breaking them will face the consequences, no matter how much you cry.

If you guys are really think we ban people just because we don't like their tone or attitude, then I severely overestimated your intelligence.
For if that was the case, I would have banned a lot more people.

This is how it is, it's not up for discussion.
Don't like it? Leave.

Silkroad Online Forums

RedBlueGreen and others.

RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.

Re: RedBlueGreen and others.