We was/ We were

pipigrande · Post by **pipigrande** » Sun May 10, 2009 4:48 am

Do you say we was or we were?

I say 'we were' and every time I hear 'we was' I'm like hmmm, because it sounds bad to me...

Kirkaldi · Post by **Kirkaldi** » Sun May 10, 2009 4:50 am

We were.

Mirosuke · Post by **Mirosuke** » Sun May 10, 2009 5:02 am

For me, Were is the right word for We.

Btw, same question with:

"You're an idiot." or "Your an idiot." :roll:

I hate the ppl who say it wrong :banghead:

(Second one is fail, the first one is ok)

XemnasXD · Post by **XemnasXD** » Sun May 10, 2009 5:04 am

was just sounds stupid....

Reise · Post by **Reise** » Sun May 10, 2009 5:13 am

I'm not gonna lie I say "we was" on occasion.

Most of the time though I say it normally.

Starrie · Post by **Starrie** » Sun May 10, 2009 6:01 am

We were... I think thats pretty obvious, we was just doesnt sound good.

I was / I were

CrimsonNuker · Post by **CrimsonNuker** » Sun May 10, 2009 6:07 am

Naw homie its we was.

Midori · Post by **Midori** » Sun May 10, 2009 6:07 am

In the area i live in, "We was" is used by white trash.

evilpeta · Post by **evilpeta** » Sun May 10, 2009 6:16 am

whoever started the "we/they/you was" shit is an idiot
and 'it sounds bad' because it's wrong

Mirosuke wrote:For me, Were is the right word for We.

Btw, same question with:

"You're an idiot." or "Your an idiot."
I hate the ppl who say it wrong

(Second one is fail, the first one is ok)

yeah, same goes for There, Their and They're. *sigh*

Breed · Post by **Breed** » Sun May 10, 2009 6:27 am

we have a very literate forum

kreisimees · Post by **kreisimees** » Sun May 10, 2009 6:35 am

Breed wrote:we have a very literate forum

Would you prefer illiterate? :roll:

Breed · Post by **Breed** » Sun May 10, 2009 6:43 am

kreisimees wrote:
Breed wrote:we have a very literate forum

Would you prefer illiterate?

I'll never miss bad grammar.
It's a shame that theres teenagers who cant spell at all.

Snickers · Post by **Snickers** » Sun May 10, 2009 6:46 am

Kirkaldi wrote:We were.

woutR · Post by **woutR** » Sun May 10, 2009 9:39 am

We was is for black gangsters and wiggers.

What annoys me the most is their/they're and your/you're. In my own language I got annoyed to **** by hun/hen which could either mean them and their.
Literally what these fucktards are saying is "I'm going to their."

MrJoey · Post by **MrJoey** » Sun May 10, 2009 10:26 am

Breed wrote:we have a very literate forum

There's plenty of illiterates on this forum, hopefully they have seizures or something when they see this topic.

v Alas, no seizure.

M3K0S · Post by **M3K0S** » Sun May 10, 2009 10:47 am

haha we was for some black ppl and wiggers...
we were is the correct term...
but cmon it dusnt matter every1 has their own vocabulary and as long as sum1 understand what your trying to say youre cool...
like when i tell sum1 to stop it i say "kick it!"...

Psychedeelic · Post by **Psychedeelic** » Sun May 10, 2009 11:15 am

ive never ever used we was.. sounds so wrong

noobert mclagg · Post by **noobert mclagg** » Sun May 10, 2009 1:51 pm

We were, we was just does sound right.

NuclearSilo · Post by **NuclearSilo** » Sun May 10, 2009 2:12 pm

Starrie wrote:We were... I think thats pretty obvious, we was just doesnt sound good.

I was / I were

"I were" exists

XemnasXD · Post by **XemnasXD** » Sun May 10, 2009 2:48 pm

M3K0S wrote:haha we was for some black ppl and wiggers...

because only some black people or white people trying to act black say we was....

thank you for your stereotype

evilpeta · Post by **evilpeta** » Sun May 10, 2009 3:48 pm

he's not generalizing so it's not a stereotype
it's like saying some asians have small dicks, that's not a stereotype either.

asians have small dicks. blacks and wiggers say 'we was'. those are stereotypes

XemnasXD · Post by **XemnasXD** » Sun May 10, 2009 4:19 pm

not to take this far off topic so this will be my last word on the subject but you do realize that stereotyping IS generalizing....

heroo · Post by **heroo** » Sun May 10, 2009 4:30 pm

we was is da shizzle yohh.

Draquish · Post by **Draquish** » Sun May 10, 2009 4:38 pm

Breed wrote:
kreisimees wrote:
Breed wrote:we have a very literate forum

Would you prefer illiterate?

I'll never miss bad grammar.
It's a shame that there's teenagers who can't spell at all.

evilpeta · Post by **evilpeta** » Sun May 10, 2009 4:48 pm

XemnasXD wrote:not to take this far off topic so this will be my last word on the subject but you do realize that stereotyping IS generalizing....

exactly and that's why it was not meant to be a stereotype/generalization since he added "SOME" in the sentence. not that hard to figure out

Draquish wrote:
Breed wrote:
kreisimees wrote:
Would you prefer illiterate?

I'll never miss bad grammar.
It's a shame that there's teenagers who can't spell at all.

fail at grammar check
supposed to be there're not there's

Draquish · Post by **Draquish** » Sun May 10, 2009 5:08 pm

Touche mademoiselle.

XemnasXD · Post by **XemnasXD** » Sun May 10, 2009 5:20 pm

there're is not a word. It is merely some backwoods patois...

cin · Post by **cin** » Sun May 10, 2009 5:33 pm

Breed wrote:we has a very literate forum

Mirosuke · Post by **Mirosuke** » Sun May 10, 2009 11:19 pm

inky · Post by **inky** » Mon May 11, 2009 12:10 am

We were

Code: Select all

Silkroad Online Forums

We was/ We were

What do you say?

We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were

Re: We was/ We were