Snoopy wrote:I love how it's automatically seen as racism when a white guy laughs at a black guy. Seriously, wake up to yourself homo's.
XemnasXD wrote:.curve wrote:
1. You're only making my case more. If it's more dominant in Africa than any other country, than obviously they're more fcking likely to spread it.
Adversely, if it's more dominant in gay men, they are more god damn likely to spread it.
1. africa is not a country
again your not reading anything im posting. You posted a percent of a percent. Your information says that of all the men who have AIDS a % of them have had gay sex. Thats all it says. It does not say anywhere that gay people are more likely to spread the disease. The way the disease is spread and the populations its prominent do not scale together. The chance of catching the disease drops to .01 when using a condom between ALL couples. If people use protection gays are no more likely to spread the disease than any other population. So in answer to your original statement that HIV/AIDS is more easily spread in a homosexual relationship the answer is NO. Biologically there is nothing in gay sex that makes the disease easier to spread and if a condom is used the chances of it being spread becomes equal all across the board. The reason why the disease was initially so high in the gay population was simply because we didn't use condoms because we can't have babies.
Is it more common, perhaps, i haven't seen the statics on Gay Men with HIV/AIDS only the statistics on Men with AIDS who have had gay sex which are two completely different numbers.
Whatever the reasons, in 2005, MSM still accounted for about 53% of all new HIV/AIDS cases and 71% of cases in male adults and adolescents.
.curve wrote:Plutonium wrote:How about seeing a woman kissing another woman or a woman holding another woman's hand? Does that make you angry too? I see it on a daily basis. If that doesn't make you angry, why is it not okay for the opposite gender to do the same?
No, double standard obviously.
XemnasXD wrote:@Plutonium
snoopy was trying to call me ugly or something to that effect. That wasn't directed at my race afaik but he has limited intelligence and when back up against the wall has no choice but to start shouting school boy insults.
Plutonium wrote:.curve wrote:Plutonium wrote:How about seeing a woman kissing another woman or a woman holding another woman's hand? Does that make you angry too? I see it on a daily basis. If that doesn't make you angry, why is it not okay for the opposite gender to do the same?
No, double standard obviously.
Justification?
XemnasXD wrote:@Plutonium
snoopy was trying to call me ugly or something to that effect. That wasn't directed at my race afaik but he has limited intelligence and when back up against the wall has no choice but to start shouting school boy insults. next he'll be making cracks about my mom, and making fun of me because i don't watch Hanna Montana. Again he's not being racist, thats just the best he can come up with.
You probably didn't get the insult because i look damn good and its so obvious that my hair is fantastic, i know, who could possibly have anything bad to say about that. Snoopy thats who, isn't that right little guy. Coochi coochi coo your so cute when you're stupid, yes you are, yes you are!!
XemnasXD wrote:@Curve
The reason is simple. Guys don't like to use condoms. They don't think they need them whether they're straight or gay and if they had a choice without consequences they'd go without the condom. I still don't know if those numbers are exact or where they're getting their data from but AIDS is increasing all across the board in almost every group including straight couples. In the US where the disease initially hit the gay community the hardest it would make sense that we still make up a proportion of the people with the disease. And again the CDC is not the be all end all medical website and its certainly not the biggest authority on AIDS in the US. As someone who actually keeps up with the disease more often than most people in science and health magazines i'd say those numbers are a bit off, but that might just be because they are 4 years old. Also keep in mind that if only 2,000 people reported having AIDS in 2005 than that means only 1000 of them had gay sex which isn't alot of people in the overall, not the best number but not a good number.
Lastly, and i'll say again. Posting numbers and stats without knowing their meaning or how to use them is just as useless as a snoopy post. Your right, you have posted more numbers than me but you've repeatedly confused their meanings and connections with relation to the point you were trying to prove thus rendering them void. I can post a bunch of numbers too and i probably should but i don't feel like taking 2 seconds to google something then pic out the first piece of information i see regardless of the fact that its 4 years out of date and then try to pass it off like i know completely what im talking about now....
XemnasXD wrote:You posted the percent of males with AIDS and somehow that correlates into Gay couples getting AIDS easier than straight couples. One is a statistic and one is a social issue. There is a relation but not the type which you imply. As i said if alls gay and straight people used condoms the spread of the disease drops to .01 at least when having sex.
Also i never said i knew more than the CDC. But i do the reputation of the CDC and i do know more than one credible source of medical information and i do know that your into is out of date.
....i hate having to connect the dots for ppl
As someone who actually keeps up with the disease more often than most people in science and health magazines i'd say those numbers are a bit off
Isn't AIDS/HIV spread more easily in homosexual relationships?
