user wrote:Crumpets wrote:lol.
As if this doesn't happen 100,000x a day and people turn a blind eye to it.
what are you talking about, righteous people report this sort of shit to police
Isn't it clear ?
user wrote:Crumpets wrote:lol.
As if this doesn't happen 100,000x a day and people turn a blind eye to it.
what are you talking about, righteous people report this sort of shit to police


JustaDude wrote:I got a video of some dude using baby cats as bait to fish sharks and marlin's im looking for the vid right now cant find it. as soon as i get it i'll post.. its real sad.
Crumpets wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCaFiEE9lqE
Case solved .. people can now go back to not giving a shit about anuimal cruelty as usual.
user wrote:this man does not represent me on animal abuse
+1Grimjaw wrote:JustaDude wrote:I got a video of some dude using baby cats as bait to fish sharks and marlin's im looking for the vid right now cant find it. as soon as i get it i'll post.. its real sad.
How about you don't post that?

Crumpets wrote:user wrote:this man does not represent me on animal abuse
And now in a coherent English sentance please.
Crumpets wrote:lol.
As if this doesn't happen 100,000x a day and people turn a blind eye to it.
user wrote:Crumpets wrote:user wrote:this man does not represent me on animal abuse
And now in a coherent English sentance please.
my english no good
Crumpets wrote:
Meh, I think I know what you are trying to say. To comment on what you said again .. Yes I am against any form of animal abuse for pleasure. *Worded that sentance carefully as I eat meat. Anyways, the reason i said what I said was that there are so many cases of animal abuse when you walk around towns or watch vids and no one gives a toss about it. Only when 'The internet' gets involved everyone musthop on the 'cool wagon' and give a rats ass. Now after this is done, everyone will go back to their usual self and forget about normal abuse.
See now ?
user wrote:Killing animals is okay for me under 2 circumstances: For scientific research to save human lives (Eg. Insulins was created from animal testing) and for food.
Sacchin wrote:user wrote:Killing animals is okay for me under 2 circumstances: For scientific research to save human lives (Eg. Insulins was created from animal testing) and for food.
There are already proven methods that don't need animals to be tested on, in fact people refer to animal testing as the old unnecessary, inaccurate and primitive way.
user wrote:Sacchin wrote:user wrote:Killing animals is okay for me under 2 circumstances: For scientific research to save human lives (Eg. Insulins was created from animal testing) and for food.
There are already proven methods that don't need animals to be tested on, in fact people refer to animal testing as the old unnecessary, inaccurate and primitive way.
What are the alternatives then, would you care like to explain more?
TOloseGT wrote:i heard his life AND his family's life got fked up by hackers.

inky wrote:If you wannna' start talking about animal testing, go make another thread. You'll require a much bigger space for that. Although I love animals, I do believe that animal testings are one of the necessary things we have to do but are not exactly happy about it. Hell, even my current microbio professor, who has been a vet for 40 years, believes that animal testings are essential for our survival. If you don't know shit about this topic, don't even bother posting. Most of the people who bitch about animal testings only look at it from the surface and don't realize the underlying issues involved in this highly debated topic.