I hit 80!

Zero_Doom · Post by **Zero_Doom** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:03 pm

Not really, just wanted to show off that I hit lvl 80 finally! xD

Woohoo · Post by **Woohoo** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:05 pm

attention whore, i hate misleading title.

AznFury · Post by **AznFury** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:16 pm

Zero_Doom · Post by **Zero_Doom** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:17 pm

Hahaha, yea it is. xD Figured I would see how many people are extremely obsessed with the topic, and since I posted there are already 21+ views. If this was labeled "I hit 80!" it would be more like 5 - 6 views at this time in the morning. xD

Krevidy · Post by **Krevidy** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:23 pm

Woohoo wrote:attention whore, i hate misleading title.

JKMB · Post by **JKMB** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:25 pm

lol Gz Remus. (In b4 bot accusation)Jokes..

CeLL · Post by **CeLL** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:37 pm

...um this is the first topic i have seen about this in quite some time. are you sure you arent the one with the obsession issues? and gratz on 80 homie.

deathtoall · Post by **deathtoall** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:50 pm

Grats remus

Zero_Doom · Post by **Zero_Doom** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:51 pm

Zeela12 wrote:oh em gee i tink reemas u put rong tytle

i don c nightblaam bot durrga durrga

hak sherpa sherpa?

Zero_Doom · Post by **Zero_Doom** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:04 pm

Honestly I figured that this title would get the most views, so I used it. And look! It worked. xD

WickedFever · Post by **WickedFever** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:38 pm

who cares if he bots, everyone bots.

Disconn3cted · Post by **Disconn3cted** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:55 pm

WickedFever wrote:who cares if he bots, everyone bots.

1. nightbloom is female
2. this topic isn't even really about someone botting

@ topic starter you're right if it said "I hit lvl 80" I wouldn't have looked...you have deceived me :banghead:

sama98b · Post by **sama98b** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:57 pm

In the time you hit 80 others have 7 character ff lv90 >.<

Just so you feel good ....

Zero_Doom · Post by **Zero_Doom** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:03 pm

sama98b wrote:In the time you hit 80 others have 7 character ff lv90 >.<
Just so you feel good ....

That's true, but there is no plvl or pfarming in my character's past. Along with several months that I spent with my gf a while back. Not too worried about capped ff lvl90's that didn't get there by them pressing 123 over and over again.

Dark Ashelin · Post by **Dark Ashelin** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:19 pm

Zero_Doom wrote:
sama98b wrote:In the time you hit 80 others have 7 character ff lv90 >.<
Just so you feel good ....

That's true, but there is no plvl or pfarming in my character's past. Along with several months that I spent with my gf a while back. Not too worried about capped ff lvl90's that didn't get there by them pressing 123 over and over again.

Lies menz! Gf does not exist xD

Zero_Doom · Post by **Zero_Doom** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:20 pm

So many flames, and all because I hit level 80. :roll:

Toasty · Post by **Toasty** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:21 pm

Some people just dont appreciate having a high level char. Its as if they dont realise how much work / effort goes into making one..

Zero_Doom · Post by **Zero_Doom** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:22 pm

Toasty wrote:Some people just dont appreciate having a high level char. Its as if they dont realise how much work / effort goes into making one..

I'm seriously curious why they wouldn't know how much work/effort goes into making one... since most people that flamed me on here have them. I wonder why... :roll:

noobert mclagg · Post by **noobert mclagg** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:25 pm

Gratz anyways though

Shadowfox542 · Post by **Shadowfox542** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:47 pm

Zero_Doom wrote:
Toasty wrote:Some people just dont appreciate having a high level char. Its as if they dont realise how much work / effort goes into making one..

I'm seriously curious why they wouldn't know how much work/effort goes into making one... since most people that flamed me on here have them. I wonder why...

We don't care that your 80. Those that do care, would've entered the thread if it were called "I hit 80.".

Why is it so important to you to attract a stronger audience?

Zero_Doom · Post by **Zero_Doom** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:50 pm

Shadowfox542 wrote:
Zero_Doom wrote:
Toasty wrote:Some people just dont appreciate having a high level char. Its as if they dont realise how much work / effort goes into making one..

I'm seriously curious why they wouldn't know how much work/effort goes into making one... since most people that flamed me on here have them. I wonder why...

We don't care that your 80. Those that do care, would've entered the thread if it were called "I hit 80.".

Why is it so important to you to attract a stronger audience?

If you don't care, then why are you here? Is it because you are with all the other viewers who "don't care about nightbloom botting"? All these people that don't care and yet this topic has had over 400 views in 3 hours. Very interesting. xP

Disconn3cted · Post by **Disconn3cted** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:51 pm

I will now make all my topics with title "video of nightbloom botting"

Barotix · Post by **Barotix** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:52 pm

The misleading title was bound to cause flames. Gratz on 80; a very big achievement for any legit.

<<Editing the Topic.>>

Shadowfox542 · Post by **Shadowfox542** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:53 pm

Barotix wrote:The misleading title was bound to cause flames. Gratz on 80; a very big achievement for any legit.

<<Editing the Topic.>>

Causing flames=Trolling

Trolling=Against ToS

amirite?

Zero_Doom · Post by **Zero_Doom** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:57 pm

Barotix, that was so uncalled for. I am enjoying seeing that my thread got the same amount of views in 4 hours as another thread did in 17 hours. So really, why is nightbloom such a hot topic here? There was a thread open for an hour about nightbloom on Rev6 that had over 500 views. People state that they are no longer interested in nightbloom when so clearly they are.

Barotix, you can lock this thread now. Thanks guys for participating in my experiment. <3

Zero_Doom · Post by **Zero_Doom** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:58 pm

Shadowfox542 wrote:
Barotix wrote:The misleading title was bound to cause flames. Gratz on 80; a very big achievement for any legit.

<<Editing the Topic.>>

Causing flames=Trolling

Trolling=Against ToS

amirite?

Who was trolling? I just had a cleverly titled thread that drew people in. It's called advertising bud, look into it.

Barotix · Post by **Barotix** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:59 pm

Shadowfox542 wrote:
Barotix wrote:The misleading title was bound to cause flames. Gratz on 80; a very big achievement for any legit.

<<Editing the Topic.>>

Causing flames=Trolling

Trolling=Against ToS

amirite?

Well trolling isn't against the ToS, but it does fall under "intentionally pissing off other members" [5 easy ways to get banned], but I don't think Remus' intention was to cause flames.

Thanks guys for participating in my experiment.

A social experiment? You should have foreseen the flames.

Shadowfox542 · Post by **Shadowfox542** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:01 pm

Barotix wrote:
Shadowfox542 wrote:
Barotix wrote:The misleading title was bound to cause flames. Gratz on 80; a very big achievement for any legit.

<<Editing the Topic.>>

Causing flames=Trolling

Trolling=Against ToS

amirite?

Well trolling isn't against the ToS, but it does fall under "intentionally pissing off other members" [5 easy ways to get banned], but I don't think Remus' intention was to cause flames.

Srsly?

Every topic in GD remotely related nightbloom has been locked due to flames. Why would this be different. I appreciate the title change and everything, but he knew this would piss of some members.

Silkroad Online Forums

I hit 80!

I hit 80!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: nightbloom botting!

Re: I hit 80!

Re: I hit 80!

Re: I hit 80!

Re: I hit 80!

Re: I hit 80!

Re: I hit 80!

Re: I hit 80!