Man you have a seriously bad habit of misinterpreting my statements. CBA to clarify [although some clarification might help you understand my point of view]. My Sig sums up w/e long response I would have posted.
I'll try to make this as short as possible:
Mind telling me exactly how I would lose both freedom and security by sacrificing a little of the former?
If you're giving up freedom how exactly are you
more secure? To give up freedom for security is a paradox.
Who said I can't trust my family and friends?
Err, no-one.
But do my personal acquaintances govern me?
I didn't mention your personal acquaintances governing you, but I did mention trusting
yourself. Do you understand the concept of self-governance?
1]Do I pay income tax to my friends? 2]Do they make laws?
1]Unconstitutional. 2]What do laws have to do with this "discussion?"
they are strangers. But they are our leaders.
The bureaucracy also consist of
several unelected officials. I look for statesmen, not leaders.
Its obvious what you think of the American bureaucracy.
Yeah, I think we need senators and congressmen that actually, idk, follow the constitution most of the time, and don't constantly twist the words to fit w/e social agenda they had in mind when they ran. Their job is simple; To
uphold and preserve the constitution. They ain't doing it well.
You will be eternally suspicious and dissatisfied with our government.
Suspicious? Yes, but I have my reasons. Dissatisfied? A fleeting feeling.
Do you live in China?
No, I live in America.
I feel like I left some things untyped and it might bite me in the ass when you misinterpret this post and read into it, again.
