An Atheist's Call to Arms

[Tasdik]

oh did john say that in the bible? or did peter? was it jesus?

Actually Luke's writings is the one I quoted. He was a highly educated physician. But yes Jesus is the one who SAID it.

[TOloseGT]

Actually Luke's writings is the one I quoted. He was a highly educated physician. But yes Jesus is the one who SAID it.

oh well, here's what i said 5 secs ago: and tolosegt did unto tasdik a mockery of epic proportions

[Tasdik]

Tasd, 2) I could say the same about the stories of all the Greek Gods. 3) Jesus asked for the donkey to be brought to him when they were close, to fulfill the prophecy. 4) Lol @ your arguments.


Dude, you haven't quoted the bible. >_>.

I was simply replying to Baro.
What does "Jesus asked for the donkey to be brought to him when they were close, to fulfill the prophecy." have to do with anything I said?
This difference between the Bible and Greek mythology is simply that the Bible is the oldest most accurate historical document around.

[Tasdik]

Actually Luke's writings is the one I quoted. He was a highly educated physician. But yes Jesus is the one who SAID it.

oh well, here's what i said 5 secs ago: and tolosegt did unto tasdik a mockery of epic proportions

You haven't done anything. Just say stupid random BS. If you want to debate then say something that's worth my time replying to.

[TOloseGT]

when u stop pulling shit outta the bible, i'll behave

[Tasdik]

when u stop pulling shit outta the bible, i'll behave

Why can't I?

[TOloseGT]

because the bible is as relevant to this discussion as emily osment is to star wars

[Draquish]

This difference between the Bible and Greek mythology is simply that the Bible is the oldest most accurate historical document around.

Lol, conversation over. I leave now. xD.

[Tasdik]

Peradventure atheists are correct, they must explain two things with regards to evolution: the formation of cell and the formation of the proteins to create that cell.

Now, to say that they randomly formed requires a leap of logic much greater than any creationist as the odds of that happening are highly improbable. Considering that scientists are still desperately attempting to explain how such a thing could have developed naturally, most agree that as our knowledge of the universe stands right now, there must have been some type of an out-of-this world force to create it. Even Richard Dawkins acknowledges this. However, he claims that the out-of-this world force is most likely some type of alien.

With regards to science being a basis for the denial of God, consider that spontaneous generation was once considered scientific "law." If anyone says science has "proven" anything, they're simply wrong in that science can only help draw reasonable conclusions based on known data and can in fact prove nothing as there is an infinite amount of data available. In addition, consider the model of the atom that most of you learned about. I can almost guarantee you that the model you learned about in your high school science class has now been shown to be inaccurate. Consequently, science has thus far even failed to provide an explanation for the most fundamental building block of life, yet atheists claim it can prove the nonexistence of God? Who is really making logical fallacies here?

[TOloseGT]

i'm with u on that one. proving and disproving the existence of god is asinine.

[XemnasXD]

This difference between the Bible and Greek mythology is simply that the Bible is the oldest most accurate historical document around.

That is just ignorant. It is a fact that most of the stories in the Bible are just copies of stories from FAR OLDER religions. Hinduism, one of, if not the oldest religion in the world, tells the story of the flood that wiped out the world wayyyy before God came along, Christians and Jews just took the story and added their own little touches.

As i said earlier their are tons of text documents that predate the bible. The would be more if christians didn't so zealously destroy every other historical document they used to come across because it so obviously threatened the claim that their religion was the right one. Hell, even the Art of War predates the the New Testament and the Old testament.

So lastly the bible is neither the oldest or the most historically accurate document around. Its a collection of fables stolen from other older religions and stories about the teachings of a man name jesus which could hardly be considered historical because he did nothing historical unless you're a Christian.

[piootr]

This difference between the Bible and Greek mythology is simply that the Bible is the oldest most accurate historical document around.

That is just ignorant. It is a fact that most of the stories in the Bible are just copies of stories from FAR OLDER religions. Hinduism, one of, if not the oldest religion in the world, tells the story of the flood that wiped out the world wayyyy before God came along, Christians and Jews just took the story and added their own little touches.

As i said earlier their are tons of text documents that predate the bible. The would be more if christians didn't so zealously destroy every other historical document they used to come across because it so obviously threatened the claim that their religion was the right one. Hell, even the Art of War predates the the New Testament and the Old testament.

So lastly the bible is neither the oldest or the most historically accurate document around. Its a collection of fables stolen from other older religions and stories about the teachings of a man name jesus which could hardly be considered historical because he did nothing historical unless you're a Christian.

And on that note:
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/

[Reise]

Tasdik dug himself quite the hole here. Think he can climb out?

[Grimjaw]

Tasdik dug himself quite the hole here. Think he can climb out?

Not unless someone hands him a ladder and a helping merciful hand.

[Draquish]

Tasdik dug himself quite the hole here. Think he can climb out?

Not unless someone hands him a ladder and a helping merciful hand.

10 fake monies say he's stuck.

[TOloseGT]

u guys are mean =[

[Barotix]

My "Norse" mythology image wins /thread. Talk about one hell of a shovel.
[edit*]Tasdik, you didn't see the similarities?

Lets try again:

Spoiler!

[/Pi]

Evolution is a mere theory and a lie propagated by humorless scientists who dream of simplifying the world into facts and numbers. The most obvious explanation for the origin of life is obviously Comical Design.

What is Comical Design?

The theory of Comical Design (CD theory) holds that certain amusing features of the universe, of living things and even the mechanical world are best explained by a cause with a sense of humour, not by natural means. Through the study and analysis of an entity’s appearance, a CD theorist is able to determine whether various natural entities are the product of chance, natural law, comical design, or some combination thereof. Such research involves observing the types of laughter produced when comical agents are viewed. Comical design has applied this scientific method to detect design in irreducibly hilarious biological structures, with prime examples in nature being the infamous duck-billed platypus of the animal kingdom and natural organic phallic entities (NOPEs) such as trees shaped like penises. In the mechanical world the same applies, with the Robin Reliant being undeniably irreducibly hilarious.

Is comical design a scientific theory?

Yes. The scientific method is commonly described as a four-step process involving observations, hypothesis, experiments, and conclusion. Comical design begins with the observation that hysterical agents produce complex and specified humour (CASH). CD theorists hypothesize that if a natural or mechanical object was comically designed, it will contain high levels of CASH. Scientists then perform experimental tests upon these objects to determine if they contain complex and specified humour. One easily testable form of CASH is irreducible hilarity, which can be discovered by experimentally watching the aforementioned entities and other observers to see if any form of side-splitting takes place. When CD researchers find irreducible hilarity in biology or machinery, they conclude that such structures were designed.

Who supports CD theory?

Here at the centre of comical knowledge (COCK) we are looking for scientists to aid in our research. A PhD is not necessary, nor a Masters or any form of degree or qualification. Break away from the fear of supporting the obviously flawed and humourless Darwinism. This group has been created to spread the theory of comical design so that all may become aware of the hilarity which is so obviously caused only by design. Donations in the form of pictures or videos pertaining to entities befitting of the descriptions above will be appreciated muchly.

Examples:






Source: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=12362066825

[Tasdik]

Tasdik dug himself quite the hole here. Think he can climb out?

Not unless someone hands him a ladder and a helping merciful hand.

10 fake monies say he's stuck.

*pays 10 fake monies*

Ignore everything I said prior to my question about "the formation of cell and the formation of the proteins to create that cell."

[DonBebek]

Trying to argue about the existence of god is the same as trying to argue about the existence of 'The flying spaghetti monster'

OH NO!
He's watching us
Tell me tasdik, how can you DISPROVE the existence of the spaghetti monster if I tell you I worship it?
How can you disprove it's amazing power and the fact that it created everything.
YOU CAN'T
lol

[Du De Wei]

nice vid dawkins pwns religions

and on that note quoting the bible is like quoting that scientology book dunno the name if u believe everything the bible says u would be stoning gays sitting on ur ass on sundays