mike2007 wrote:got a problem with that?Berto wrote:Someone in Epic named Phuk and someone in Blackhand named Phucker lulz
I don't care about accusations, I found the coincidence ironic.
mike2007 wrote:got a problem with that?Berto wrote:Someone in Epic named Phuk and someone in Blackhand named Phucker lulz
penfold1992 wrote:ONT! are avalon reali splitting? seems like a lot of effort to giv in to botters.... avalon guild makes no1 legit guild, only legit guild to stay on top. yet disbands. epic fail?
Berto wrote:OH SHEEEEEeeeeTTTttt SONNnn
Avalon lost
penfold1992 wrote:i have to agree. this isnt general discussion
this is another VENUS RULES WITH LEGITS thread which us non legits dont seem 2 care about?
can you please keep the venus discussion in the venus room?
NO_SILK_4_ME wrote:Berto wrote:bebrazz wrote:so its fall of all legits in venus?lol
It's bound to happen eventually. The only thing left is losing the fortress. One may think that fortress is nothing compared to the message of legits. NOPE, they'll learn true colors once the Jangan fortress falls to the other union, there wouldn't be a base to prove playing a legit union is better than botting, because you'll just be inferior to the botter's uni, thus - the Union and message begins to deteriorate and crumble as did all the other servers =)
Only a matter of t-t-timeeeeeeeEeeEEe.
That's depressing![]()
From what I gathered. Epic Won. Avalon is refusing to disband, claims that they're cheaters because they recruited all the bots they could find that were FF capped with good sets from their union AND had outside buffers.
antics wrote:NO_SILK_4_ME wrote:From what I gathered. Epic Won. Avalon is refusing to disband, claims that they're cheaters because they recruited all the bots they could find that were FF capped with good sets from their union AND had outside buffers.
was it somewhere in the rules they couldnt recruit at the last minute?
nightbloom wrote:antics wrote:NO_SILK_4_ME wrote:From what I gathered. Epic Won. Avalon is refusing to disband, claims that they're cheaters because they recruited all the bots they could find that were FF capped with good sets from their union AND had outside buffers.
was it somewhere in the rules they couldnt recruit at the last minute?
When blasjr first asked me to make this "bet" I said we would do it if they played "straight". They didnt, they were adding people from guilds outside their own union even. They recruited another union to act as outside buffers. I mean it was crazy the amount of cheating going on. That is hardly playing "straight". And I dont want to hear that ringing in players from all over the server is fair, cause its not. We agreed to fight Epic, not Epic + every other botter awake during that one hour period.

BalkanFanaticS wrote:Lv 90 S/S Hybrid [Active]
Lv 90 Glavie [Active]
Lv 87 Wizzard [Active]
Lv 86 Str Bowman [Active]
Lv 86 Hybrid Bowman [Active]
Lv 86 Int Spear [Active]
Tasdik wrote:Avalon should let some other legit guild take the fortress *like Blackhand* and disband. Don't use the fortress as an excuse to not disband.
Bop wrote:Tasdik wrote:Avalon should let some other legit guild take the fortress *like Blackhand* and disband. Don't use the fortress as an excuse to not disband.
are u certain that what nightbloom said is incorrect? Maybe you really cant disband when holding the fortress...although I cant prove whether thats true or not lol
Tasdik wrote:Bop wrote:Tasdik wrote:Avalon should let some other legit guild take the fortress *like Blackhand* and disband. Don't use the fortress as an excuse to not disband.
are u certain that what nightbloom said is incorrect? Maybe you really cant disband when holding the fortress...although I cant prove whether thats true or not lol
I'm sure what NB said is correct. However, they should let some other legit guild tak the fortress such as Blackhand during the next FW. Avalon should relinquish it's FW rights and disband.
nightbloom wrote:We did not agree to give up the fortress. We did not agree to disband the union.
Ragnorak wrote:Well I hope that a Legit union does not loose the fortress
Tasdik wrote:Ragnorak wrote:Well I hope that a Legit union does not loose the fortress
A legit union would still control the fortress. BHA
Tasdik wrote:Ragnorak wrote:Well I hope that a Legit union does not loose the fortress
A legit union would still control the fortress. BHA

nightbloom wrote:Tasdik wrote:Ragnorak wrote:Well I hope that a Legit union does not loose the fortress
A legit union would still control the fortress. BHA
I dont think BHA WANTS the fortress tbh. grace says they dont have enough people that can get up that early, that a lot of their members are in school, etc... Avalon never agreed to "give away" the fortress to a guild of your choosing.
The original deal was to play fair and Epic didnt. I dont think I am breaking any kind of agreement that wasnt already null and void.



TOloseGT wrote:yea, what epic did was retarded. they didn't honor the rules, why should u? no one's gonna look down on u for not disbanding.


