Ratings

[brentonsbbe359]

I Made two more sigs today
this is the first one:



this is the second one:



I'm going to work on resizing the second one tomarrow.

please rate the first or the second one. I'm getting better and better at making sigs

[Melez]

Very simple though not bad. Just RESIZEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

[brentonsbbe359]

I finished it and its in my siggy. Its actually not as simple as it seems. I had to pick up alot of stuff and move it to the top for when i resized. And i added blurr and some interesting shadows. And tint. Then i changed to angle. If you look you can tell its at a rightwards slant.

[brentonsbbe359]

bump

[Kraq]

Should choose a better render, and only have 1 set of words, not 3. Looks good though you might wanna add a forest stock behind it all and blur it, to add depth.

[magisuns]

in that second sig and even in your revised version u have the same prob
when ur using gauss blur in a duped layer and then erasing try not to make it stick out so much. try to blend it in so its not like " HAI I ARE ERASED AND THAT PERSON ARE BLURRED "

also try to get a smoother render for sumthin like that, that one seems so... sharp x_x.

Your text drives me away from what i'm supposed to be looking at, i'm caught trying to read the tiny and difficult to read font as opposed to the sig that i should b appreciating.

the first one aint 2 bad but square isnt a turn on for me

[Melon]

I like the first one its not as pixely and it has nice colours.