About zoomhack
- Confused
- Common Member
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:47 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Sweden
About zoomhack
I saw a topic about vortex using zoomhack...
Just so u all know that Softmod has zoomhack too and there is no way that u can c that someone bots by looking on the screen only when someone use Softmod..
When i was on Zeus alot off ppl used Softmod and they say that and i knew alot of them..
The screen is the same as someone that is legit..
Only a few bot programs shows some kind of a sign if u bot on the screen..
So everyone that has zoomhack can also use softmod cuz its a part of softmod bot..
Iam not saying that i belive that vortex bots..
Hes name just show up in a topic about zoomhack
Just so u all know that Softmod has zoomhack too and there is no way that u can c that someone bots by looking on the screen only when someone use Softmod..
When i was on Zeus alot off ppl used Softmod and they say that and i knew alot of them..
The screen is the same as someone that is legit..
Only a few bot programs shows some kind of a sign if u bot on the screen..
So everyone that has zoomhack can also use softmod cuz its a part of softmod bot..
Iam not saying that i belive that vortex bots..
Hes name just show up in a topic about zoomhack
- Necrobat
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 11:39 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Australia
Re: About zoomhack
Zoomhack is an illegal hack/3rd party program which is against Joymax's ToS, and most client which have zoomhacks in are generally also able to double as bot clients.
If Joymax wanted you to have a long zoom, they would have implemented it in the first place.
If Joymax wanted you to have a long zoom, they would have implemented it in the first place.

- PR0METHEUS
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:30 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: About zoomhack
Necrobat wrote:Zoomhack is an illegal hack/3rd party program which is against Joymax's ToS, and most client which have zoomhacks in are generally also able to double as bot clients.
If Joymax wanted you to have a long zoom, they would have implemented it in the first place.
Exactly. Zoomhack != bot, but it is still 'illegal hack/3rd party software'.
I saw another thread somewhere where they were talking about running a script that drops 1 gold on the ground over and over and over faster than a human could do it. People would use it to trap gold bots. I'd say this script should be illegal, and bannable, as well. It's not the intended purpose of the modification that matters. It's the fact that the client is altered, or 3rd party software is used to modify how the client acts, that matters.
Missing the good times in SRO... 
SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
- NuclearSilo
- Forum God
- Posts: 8834
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:00 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Age of Wushu
Re: About zoomhack
zoomhack = hack
bot = bot
To hard to differentiate?
bot = bot
To hard to differentiate?
Playing Age of Wushu, dota IMBA
- chesticles
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1978
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 1:41 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
- Contact:
Re: About zoomhack
PR0METHEUS wrote:I saw another thread somewhere where they were talking about running a script that drops 1 gold on the ground over and over and over faster than a human could do it. People would use it to trap gold bots. I'd say this script should be illegal, and bannable, as well. It's not the intended purpose of the modification that matters. It's the fact that the client is altered, or 3rd party software is used to modify how the client acts, that matters.
+1. Anything that alters or modifies the client or that is 3rd party is againist JM TOS
Want to play Jade Dynasty and get a bunch of free stuff?
In USA-East, The Billows
My Inductor ID is 8390004X080400090002522Z0d21fe
Copy that code and paste it in the box when you make a new character.
- Confused
- Common Member
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:47 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Sweden
Re: About zoomhack
NuclearSilo wrote:zoomhack = hack
bot = bot
To hard to differentiate?
Zoomhack is in some bot programs..
Same shit but diff names
- NuclearSilo
- Forum God
- Posts: 8834
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:00 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Age of Wushu
Re: About zoomhack
Confused wrote:NuclearSilo wrote:zoomhack = hack
bot = bot
To hard to differentiate?
Zoomhack is in some bot programs..
Zoomhack is in loader.
Loader is not a bot.
Playing Age of Wushu, dota IMBA
- PR0METHEUS
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:30 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: About zoomhack
NuclearSilo wrote:Confused wrote:NuclearSilo wrote:zoomhack = hack
bot = bot
To hard to differentiate?
Zoomhack is in some bot programs..
Zoomhack is in loader.
Loader is not a bot.
Why argue semantics? Both are illegal in this game. Illegal bot software, illegal third party software, illegal client modifications.
Missing the good times in SRO... 
SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
- CloudStrider
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Away
Re: About zoomhack
Pro, details matter when it comes to the bannning rpocess.
Illegal 3rd Party Software -- 7 day ban [I think]
Botting -- Life time ban
Illegal 3rd Party Software -- 7 day ban [I think]
Botting -- Life time ban
penfold1992 wrote:durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S

Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
- NuclearSilo
- Forum God
- Posts: 8834
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:00 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Age of Wushu
Re: About zoomhack
PR0METHEUS wrote:NuclearSilo wrote:Confused wrote:Zoomhack is in some bot programs..
Zoomhack is in loader.
Loader is not a bot.
Why argue semantics? Both are illegal in this game. Illegal bot software, illegal third party software, illegal client modifications.
Because the thread starter didnt agree that zoomhack =/= bot
No, it's not the same shit
Playing Age of Wushu, dota IMBA
- PR0METHEUS
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:30 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: About zoomhack
CloudStrider wrote:Pro, details matter when it comes to the bannning rpocess.
Illegal 3rd Party Software -- 7 day ban [I think]
Botting -- Life time ban
Good point. They have different penalties as far as SRF is concerned. Both still illegal in game.
Missing the good times in SRO... 
SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
Re: About zoomhack
I think the point the thread starter is making, is that zoomhack can be found Softmod, therefore if a SS has zoomhack in, its equally likly to be a botter using softmod, as it is to be a loader.
* Zeus: JKMD - lvl 77 INT S/S - PvP / inactive
Guild: UnitedLegion
* Zeus: Soul_Stealer - lvl 82 STR Warlock/Rogue - N/A / retired
Guild: N/A
* Venus: JKMB - lvl 27 INT S/S - Grinding / inactive
Guild: PureEntity
* Venus: JKME - lvl 51 STR Warrior/Cleric - Ress'd / active
Guild: PureEntity
Guild: UnitedLegion
* Zeus: Soul_Stealer - lvl 82 STR Warlock/Rogue - N/A / retired
Guild: N/A
* Venus: JKMB - lvl 27 INT S/S - Grinding / inactive
Guild: PureEntity
* Venus: JKME - lvl 51 STR Warrior/Cleric - Ress'd / active
Guild: PureEntity
Re: About zoomhack
also most loaders have zoomhack and most loaders arent compatible with bots.
thats what i heard from dutch_botters guild in Olympus so most of them have softmod.. >_>
thats what i heard from dutch_botters guild in Olympus so most of them have softmod.. >_>
Server: Ephesus [Active]
Name: Luniz Lvl 48 - 0 gap Pure Int S/S
Name: Luniz Lvl 48 - 0 gap Pure Int S/S
- CloudStrider
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Away
Re: About zoomhack
PR0METHEUS wrote:CloudStrider wrote:Pro, details matter when it comes to the bannning rpocess.
Illegal 3rd Party Software -- 7 day ban [I think]
Botting -- Life time ban
Good point. They have different penalties as far as SRF is concerned. Both still illegal in game.
True.
But some people use No-DC clients to login easier, not too bot, these might have a zoom feature.
In my opinion these players are not as bad as botters.
penfold1992 wrote:durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S

Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
Re: About zoomhack
CloudStrider wrote:PR0METHEUS wrote:CloudStrider wrote:Pro, details matter when it comes to the bannning rpocess.
Illegal 3rd Party Software -- 7 day ban [I think]
Botting -- Life time ban
Good point. They have different penalties as far as SRF is concerned. Both still illegal in game.
True.
But some people use No-DC clients to login easier, not too bot, these might have a zoom feature.
In my opinion these players are not as bad as botters.
i got banned for a week from srf for saying NoDC Client Ftw... >_>
i dont use one cuz i dont need one PREMIUM for the real win ^^
anyway its against the rules cuz its a 3rd pt programm.. blabla bla...
you know the rest.
Server: Ephesus [Active]
Name: Luniz Lvl 48 - 0 gap Pure Int S/S
Name: Luniz Lvl 48 - 0 gap Pure Int S/S
- [TS]=Hark=[TS]
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:16 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Black Desert Online
Re: About zoomhack
well if its a recent ss then its more likly to be softmod because none of the loaders with zoomhack in them work anymore sence the update last tuesday.

^^ mAd propps to Verfo for the sig:P thankx man!
- Millenium
- Ex-Staff
- Posts: 2732
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:36 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Waterloo
- Contact:
Re: About zoomhack
Its true and we know that zoomhack *usually* comes with bot or other multi-client stuff.
However we can't assume vortex bots from his video. That video only tells us that he does use 3rd part software, he probably has modded client and it probably came with a bot, but at this point we can't be sure.
Anyway he's gone for another 15 days or so, if he really bots we'll probably get the news somehow =)
However we can't assume vortex bots from his video. That video only tells us that he does use 3rd part software, he probably has modded client and it probably came with a bot, but at this point we can't be sure.
Anyway he's gone for another 15 days or so, if he really bots we'll probably get the news somehow =)
DID YOU KNOW? Milly has retired!!!!
Status: Into Minecraft


Re: About zoomhack
y post shit that everyone already knows?
/lock plz
/lock plz


i love you magisuns thx for the sig
- Grimm-.-
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:12 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: SteakSauce
- Contact:
Re: About zoomhack
CloudStrider wrote:PR0METHEUS wrote:CloudStrider wrote:Pro, details matter when it comes to the bannning rpocess.
Illegal 3rd Party Software -- 7 day ban [I think]
Botting -- Life time ban
Good point. They have different penalties as far as SRF is concerned. Both still illegal in game.
True.
But some people use No-DC clients to login easier, not too bot, these might have a zoom feature.
In my opinion these players are not as bad as botters.
Tru.
Testosterone has no dc... also comes with zoom hack... curse filter thing... and other shiz
<< banned for proof of botting. -cin >>
- Teddybeer
- Active Member
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:48 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Silkroad-R
Re: About zoomhack
I DONT BELIEVE TESTOSTERONE IS TOO ILLEGAL...
/CAPS
When using AGbot on it its illegal or another bot :S
i dont understand whats wrong with zoomhack tho...
No DC i can understand it makes harder login for legit....
I dont see the problem of loader
Correct me if im wrong but ppl shouldnt get ban from using just loader only proof of bot...
no BAN please as i said : Correct me if im wrong
/CAPS
When using AGbot on it its illegal or another bot :S
i dont understand whats wrong with zoomhack tho...
No DC i can understand it makes harder login for legit....
I dont see the problem of loader
Correct me if im wrong but ppl shouldnt get ban from using just loader only proof of bot...
no BAN please as i said : Correct me if im wrong

- Necrobat
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 11:39 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Australia
Re: About zoomhack
Teddybeer wrote:I DONT BELIEVE TESTOSTERONE IS TOO ILLEGAL...
/CAPS
When using AGbot on it its illegal or another bot :S
i dont understand whats wrong with zoomhack tho...
No DC i can understand it makes harder login for legit....
I dont see the problem of loader
Correct me if im wrong but ppl shouldnt get ban from using just loader only proof of bot...
no BAN please as i said : Correct me if im wrong
Loader is still a 3rd party program.
3rd party programs are against the rules.
That is all there is to it.

- Fury
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:53 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: GuildWars2
Re: About zoomhack
yea and according to joymax's TOS, pk2 editing is also illegal, but its allowed here at srf. If you say pk2 editing doesn't affect other people or the game, nor does zoomhack...

- CloudStrider
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Away
Re: About zoomhack
Fury wrote:yea and according to joymax's TOS, pk2 editing is also illegal, but its allowed here at srf. If you say pk2 editing doesn't affect other people or the game, nor does zoomhack...
Hmmm, seems a fair point.
But you don;t get banned for using zoomhack you get banned for using the actual loader, but in essence that doesn't really affect anyone either...
penfold1992 wrote:durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S

Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
- Necrobat
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 11:39 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Australia
Re: About zoomhack
Fury wrote:yea and according to joymax's TOS, pk2 editing is also illegal, but its allowed here at srf. If you say pk2 editing doesn't affect other people or the game, nor does zoomhack...
Only Pk2 allowed here is stuff that only affects you. (aka changing how degrees look to you) Pk2 editing that affects others (see: invisibility/stealth hack) is not allowed here.
Further more, zoomhack DOES affect people, as it increase how far you can see and allows you to select people you wouldn't be able to.
I will say it again. If Joymax wanted you to have a longer zoom, it would be in the game to begin with.

- Glockshna
- Common Member
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 4:20 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Rome
- Contact:
Re: About zoomhack
Ummmmmm, Zoom hack doesn't do that. I used the Testosterone loader once before i found out that its bann-able on SRF and SRO and the zoom hack has no effect on how far you can see other players. It zooms you out yes but you cant see anything except the scenery in the field of the zoom. And further more, you cannot select anyone past the normal field of sight. It doesn't change the area of Players/NPCs u can see it only shows the scenery. I see no reason for it to be banned.
Also... This can be achieved with a pk2 edit im sure. And pk2 editing is allowed on SRF.. so i don't see why this shouldn't As long as no one uses it for the Multi-client, or for botting purposes.
Also, 1 question. Are No-DC clients allowed? Im a bit fuzzy on that subject in the SRF rules. It does modify the way SRO acts but it has no effect on other players, like changing the way ur char looks to u... Is it allowed?
I will put emphasis on the fact that i only used it ONCE. I don't use it now seeing that its against the rules.
Also... This can be achieved with a pk2 edit im sure. And pk2 editing is allowed on SRF.. so i don't see why this shouldn't As long as no one uses it for the Multi-client, or for botting purposes.
Also, 1 question. Are No-DC clients allowed? Im a bit fuzzy on that subject in the SRF rules. It does modify the way SRO acts but it has no effect on other players, like changing the way ur char looks to u... Is it allowed?
I will put emphasis on the fact that i only used it ONCE. I don't use it now seeing that its against the rules.
CeLL wrote:on the off topic, presenting the existance of a loader and or bot within your posts is bot support even if you dont bot... thats like if i put sbot in my sig or something.

Hmm?
- Fury
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:53 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: GuildWars2
Re: About zoomhack
No-dc clients aren't allowed here either cos that makes the "legits" harder to login.

- KsqueaKJ
- Regular Member
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:01 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Illinois
Re: About zoomhack
so ppl who are saying loaders , zoomhacks, and no dc clients are so bad?
even if what i say right here gets me banned from this site for 7 days then o well..
but honestly so u all are telling me that u never broke a law? and agree that EVERY LAW is right? and not wrong in anyway? fools.
im sure atleast 76% of u guys download music , so u think u all should be fined or put in jail? didnt think so
same goes for zoom hack and no dc client, zoom hack doesnt give u any advantage so why do u care if someone uses it? and no dc clients shouldnt be looked down upon, cuz lets see who makes it impossible to log in? o ya thats right gold bots. what do we all hate on this forum thats right gold bots. so whats the different from a legit player dishing out 20 bucks for a premium to a company who doesnt deserve that 20, compared to that same person just uses the no dc client? whats the difference? ud rather make a company money, who prefers botters to legits cuz they make more money off of them and who doesnt ban the gold bots cuz they make u guys all buy premium so they make more money, then just use a no dc client?
and i really hope this doenst get me banned from this site cuz im just arguing about what the topic is about so if u do ban me thats just immature
enjoy.
even if what i say right here gets me banned from this site for 7 days then o well..
but honestly so u all are telling me that u never broke a law? and agree that EVERY LAW is right? and not wrong in anyway? fools.
im sure atleast 76% of u guys download music , so u think u all should be fined or put in jail? didnt think so
same goes for zoom hack and no dc client, zoom hack doesnt give u any advantage so why do u care if someone uses it? and no dc clients shouldnt be looked down upon, cuz lets see who makes it impossible to log in? o ya thats right gold bots. what do we all hate on this forum thats right gold bots. so whats the different from a legit player dishing out 20 bucks for a premium to a company who doesnt deserve that 20, compared to that same person just uses the no dc client? whats the difference? ud rather make a company money, who prefers botters to legits cuz they make more money off of them and who doesnt ban the gold bots cuz they make u guys all buy premium so they make more money, then just use a no dc client?
and i really hope this doenst get me banned from this site cuz im just arguing about what the topic is about so if u do ban me thats just immature
enjoy.
server:xian
level:85
build:pure str blade
server:xian
level:60
build:pure int wizard/bard
server:xian
level:53
build:pure int spear
level:85
build:pure str blade
server:xian
level:60
build:pure int wizard/bard
server:xian
level:53
build:pure int spear
- ImmortalKiller
- Active Member
- Posts: 675
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:13 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: VA/CA
Re: About zoomhack
KsqueaKJ wrote:but honestly so u all are telling me that u never broke a law? and agree that EVERY LAW is right? and not wrong in anyway? fools.
im sure atleast 76% of u guys download music , so u think u all should be fined or put in jail? didnt think so
Where the hell did you get 76 from
Counter Strike... | Source
CAL...................................................................... | Main
Silkroad Online | Aege
...................................................................................................
CAL...................................................................... | Main
Silkroad Online | Aege
...................................................................................................

- KsqueaKJ
- Regular Member
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:01 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Illinois
Re: About zoomhack
ImmortalKiller wrote:KsqueaKJ wrote:but honestly so u all are telling me that u never broke a law? and agree that EVERY LAW is right? and not wrong in anyway? fools.
im sure atleast 76% of u guys download music , so u think u all should be fined or put in jail? didnt think so
Where the hell did you get 76 from
rofl i just picked a % from 60-80% didnt want to pick to low of a % or too high
server:xian
level:85
build:pure str blade
server:xian
level:60
build:pure int wizard/bard
server:xian
level:53
build:pure int spear
level:85
build:pure str blade
server:xian
level:60
build:pure int wizard/bard
server:xian
level:53
build:pure int spear
- Glockshna
- Common Member
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 4:20 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Rome
- Contact:
Re: About zoomhack
Fury wrote:No-dc clients aren't allowed here either cos that makes the "legits" harder to login.
So then everyone should use one. Same chances for all. And it also makes it easier for people that have shitty computers, that cant handle restarting SRO every 10 seconds.
KsqueaKJ wrote:so ppl who are saying loaders , zoomhacks, and no dc clients are so bad?
even if what i say right here gets me banned from this site for 7 days then o well..
but honestly so u all are telling me that u never broke a law? and agree that EVERY LAW is right? and not wrong in anyway? fools.
im sure atleast 76% of u guys download music , so u think u all should be fined or put in jail? didnt think so
same goes for zoom hack and no dc client, zoom hack doesnt give u any advantage so why do u care if someone uses it? and no dc clients shouldnt be looked down upon, cuz lets see who makes it impossible to log in? o ya thats right gold bots. what do we all hate on this forum thats right gold bots. so whats the different from a legit player dishing out 20 bucks for a premium to a company who doesnt deserve that 20, compared to that same person just uses the no dc client? whats the difference? ud rather make a company money, who prefers botters to legits cuz they make more money off of them and who doesnt ban the gold bots cuz they make u guys all buy premium so they make more money, then just use a no dc client?
and i really hope this doenst get me banned from this site cuz im just arguing about what the topic is about so if u do ban me thats just immature
enjoy.
+1 I totaly aggree. There is no reason to pay Joymax money that they don't deserve for a premium when u could just try 6 or 7 times with a NODC client and get in.
And also, no ones perfect. Thats the truest thing u said,
Honestly so u all are telling me that u never broke a law? and agree that EVERY LAW is right? and not wrong in anyway? fools.
im sure atleast 76% of u guys download music , so u think u all should be fined or put in jail? didnt think so
CeLL wrote:on the off topic, presenting the existance of a loader and or bot within your posts is bot support even if you dont bot... thats like if i put sbot in my sig or something.

Hmm?

