Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
- srf_frs
- Common Member
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 5:54 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: hellhole
Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
Alright, heres the deal: I weight 68 kilograms( should be about 138 pounds), i'm 1.81 tall if thats neccessery. Anyways, how deep(water ofc) would i go if jump off from a platform. I hope u get what i mean. Platform is 7,5 meters high from water.
- ghostkilla43
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:06 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
- Contact:
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
pie
<< banned for proof of botting. -cin >>
- Twist
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:09 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: BEEN DERPIN ALL DAY DERP DERP
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
So u want jump from platform and its 7.5 meters high?I think its more then enough to jump,xD!
<<Account shut down to prevent sockpuppeting. New user accountname "hey">>
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
I think he wants to jump from the platform and make sure that once he goes into the pool or whatever, he doesn't break his legs because he goes too fast too deep.
- woutR
- Elite Member
- Posts: 5573
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 5:20 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
I've jumped from a 5 meter cliff myself into water that was about 5 meters deep and I only went in 2 meters.
I think you need like 4 meters to be totally safe. I'm 64 kg btw.
I think you need like 4 meters to be totally safe. I'm 64 kg btw.

<<
- Grandpa
- Active Member
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:54 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
Not enough information is given to calculate the result.
Code: Select all
Code: Select all
- srf_frs
- Common Member
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 5:54 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: hellhole
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
Grandpa wrote:Not enough information is given to calculate the result.
Code: Select all
ROFL xD
Alright actually i wanna jump from bridge, which is 7.5 meters from water, and i dont know exactly the surface, i know that river shouldnt be over 5 m deep, there are also boats and bigger boats crossing the river,so it should be deep enough. I know its crazy stunt but i really wanna do that.
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
Only 1 way to find out..
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>
- hemagoku
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:42 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Artist Corner
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
well one time i jumped from a boat and i got really deep in the sea ,luckly i went up fast ,my glasses were full of water and couldn't see anything ,anyway it depends on the way u jump ,if i want to jump and touch the floor then come up i can do it ,if i don't ,i don't
check my dA : http://hemagoku.deviantart.com/ 
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
srf_frs wrote:Grandpa wrote:Not enough information is given to calculate the result.
Code: Select all
ROFL xD
Alright actually i wanna jump from bridge, which is 7.5 meters from water, and i dont know exactly the surface, i know that river shouldnt be over 5 m deep, there are also boats and bigger boats crossing the river,so it should be deep enough. I know its crazy stunt but i really wanna do that.
just jump take note later
<<banned from SRF for bot support. -SG>>
- NuclearSilo
- Forum God
- Posts: 8834
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:00 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Age of Wushu
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
This is physic, not math...
If today is 3 years ago, i could help u
If today is 3 years ago, i could help u
Playing Age of Wushu, dota IMBA
- AkillerNXC
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 8:49 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
NuclearSilo wrote:This is physic, not math...
If today is 3 years ago, i could help u
Yup. You would need the speed your hitting the water at, and the density of the water (Pretty sure)...
OT: Just jump and find out XD
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
Don't know what your education level is but you can get a nice estimate by doing the following (all of which is around middle school level so I know you'll be able to understand when you google it):
1. Calculate gravitational potential energy at the top of 7.5 meters.
2. Calculate velocity based on height and gravitational accerlation.
3. Calculate kinetic energy at the base of the jump. Forget dissapation by air as it's much too short of a jump to matter.
4. Google energy trasnfer rate for water for a given kinetic energy from above.
5. Subtract it and calculate the kinetic energy left over.
6. Google friction coefficient for water.
7. Multiply water's friction coefficient into energy dissapated to find out how much energy you have left.
8. Solve for velocity and plug it in to a height equation with ground level being the top stopping at 2 decimal places since anything more specific is useless.
I believe there's a much more complicated way to do this but I would not know what it is without looking it up. Unfortuinately it's 5:00 though, so I'm leaving, gl.
1. Calculate gravitational potential energy at the top of 7.5 meters.
2. Calculate velocity based on height and gravitational accerlation.
3. Calculate kinetic energy at the base of the jump. Forget dissapation by air as it's much too short of a jump to matter.
4. Google energy trasnfer rate for water for a given kinetic energy from above.
5. Subtract it and calculate the kinetic energy left over.
6. Google friction coefficient for water.
7. Multiply water's friction coefficient into energy dissapated to find out how much energy you have left.
8. Solve for velocity and plug it in to a height equation with ground level being the top stopping at 2 decimal places since anything more specific is useless.
I believe there's a much more complicated way to do this but I would not know what it is without looking it up. Unfortuinately it's 5:00 though, so I'm leaving, gl.
- hemagoku
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:42 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Artist Corner
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
ok u can do that or just jump xDSM-Count wrote:Don't know what your education level is but you can get a nice estimate by doing the following (all of which is around middle school level so I know you'll be able to understand when you google it):
1. Calculate gravitational potential energy at the top of 7.5 meters.
2. Calculate velocity based on height and gravitational accerlation.
3. Calculate kinetic energy at the base of the jump. Forget dissapation by air as it's much too short of a jump to matter.
4. Google energy trasnfer rate for water for a given kinetic energy from above.
5. Subtract it and calculate the kinetic energy left over.
6. Google friction coefficient for water.
7. Multiply water's friction coefficient into energy dissapated to find out how much energy you have left.
8. Solve for velocity and plug it in to a height equation with ground level being the top stopping at 2 decimal places since anything more specific is useless.
I believe there's a much more complicated way to do this but I would not know what it is without looking it up. Unfortuinately it's 5:00 though, so I'm leaving, gl.
check my dA : http://hemagoku.deviantart.com/ 
- Quyxz
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 4:47 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
7.5 m high
acceleration is 9.81 m/s²
distance = 0.5 a t ²
lol not wanting to calculater it all
but i can only calculate the speed you hit the water with
but this is without air fraction
acceleration is 9.81 m/s²
distance = 0.5 a t ²
lol not wanting to calculater it all
but i can only calculate the speed you hit the water with
but this is without air fraction
One oldskool matherfacker


- crazyskwrls
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:16 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
im pretty sure it depends on your u dive, if u do a belly flop its definitely going to be far less than if u do a perfect dive
also u have to take account of how much air ur lung can take, if u have a lung full of air its going to be different if your lung is almost empty
etc...
also u have to take account of how much air ur lung can take, if u have a lung full of air its going to be different if your lung is almost empty
etc...

thnx Kraq
- 0l3n
- Elite Member
- Posts: 5184
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 1:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Artists Corner
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
Backfire wrote:Only 1 way to find out..
Your right... Toss in an object with the same wight and shape like you, with an air filled 4l bag inside.
- NO_SILK_4_ME
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1016
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:14 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
It has too many factors. How fast you're going, wind, body position, body movement, how you're entering, etc.
eCSRO:
ilshootli- 81
Fembria:
iContagious - 81
ZSZC:
iPewPewUQQ - 63 Bower
Iris :
Star_L1ght - 59 Rogue/Warrior
Venus:
TR_ousers 57 Rogue/Bard
ilshootli- 81
Fembria:
iContagious - 81
ZSZC:
iPewPewUQQ - 63 Bower
Iris :
Star_L1ght - 59 Rogue/Warrior
Venus:
TR_ousers 57 Rogue/Bard
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
Just disregard those other factors and follow the steps SM typed. This is physics. Assume there is no wind, disregard body position, and air resistance.
Maddening


- Grandpa
- Active Member
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:54 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
Ever skip a rock on a lake?
Disregard body position? Okay, sure, right.
Body position is more important than body weight - question: Disregarding air/wind resistance, what falls faster 1 pound of feathers or 1 pound of lead?
crazyskwrls has the right of it. Distance from sea level, weather factors (is it a hot day), windage, water density (salt water or fresh?) and other factors (like surface tension, is it raining?) will all have a play but when it comes down to the impact and penetration it will rise or fall on how much of your body surface smacks the water. With a feet first high dive, the other factor that will limit the depth is your body's attitude after you penetrate the surface - think about the letter "J" <----- that's the path you want to have the moment after penetration.
Going head first? Don't go alone.
Code: Select all
I used to dive alot but never from any height above 40'. The way we were taught for shallow head first dive was for lifeguard style rescue (completely different). It's like trying to bellyflop and stretching out all the way at first then, just prior to impact, tuck the belly up and try to form a semi-circle with elbows, forearms and legs hitting first, then belly thrust and spread immediately after impact. That was a completely different form but watch the video, you'll get the idea. I wouldn't even think about high dive into shallow, but if you are not able to surface dive to the bottom without stopping to clear your ears it's probably deep enough. On the vid above - check it out from 1:23 to 1:26, looks like that is the approximate distance you're thinking about, right? I'd still advise against it; the bottom surface is irregular, and if unknown, caution should prevail. What if there were a log down there? Or worse, a piranha that could bite your pee-pee off
~Granps
Disregard body position? Okay, sure, right.
Body position is more important than body weight - question: Disregarding air/wind resistance, what falls faster 1 pound of feathers or 1 pound of lead?
crazyskwrls has the right of it. Distance from sea level, weather factors (is it a hot day), windage, water density (salt water or fresh?) and other factors (like surface tension, is it raining?) will all have a play but when it comes down to the impact and penetration it will rise or fall on how much of your body surface smacks the water. With a feet first high dive, the other factor that will limit the depth is your body's attitude after you penetrate the surface - think about the letter "J" <----- that's the path you want to have the moment after penetration.
Going head first? Don't go alone.
Code: Select all
I used to dive alot but never from any height above 40'. The way we were taught for shallow head first dive was for lifeguard style rescue (completely different). It's like trying to bellyflop and stretching out all the way at first then, just prior to impact, tuck the belly up and try to form a semi-circle with elbows, forearms and legs hitting first, then belly thrust and spread immediately after impact. That was a completely different form but watch the video, you'll get the idea. I wouldn't even think about high dive into shallow, but if you are not able to surface dive to the bottom without stopping to clear your ears it's probably deep enough. On the vid above - check it out from 1:23 to 1:26, looks like that is the approximate distance you're thinking about, right? I'd still advise against it; the bottom surface is irregular, and if unknown, caution should prevail. What if there were a log down there? Or worse, a piranha that could bite your pee-pee off
~Granps
- Echos
- Active Member
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 5:23 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
- Contact:
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
basically you shouldntgo deeper then 5m,ive jumped from 7m high platform to 6m deep water,my legs didnt touched the bottom,and if its deeper then 5m then you prolly just touch gently the bottom with your legs:)

Thanks IceCrash for the signature:)
timtam wrote:crackdealers ftw.
- _Creep_
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1031
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:47 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Far away from humans..............................further the better.
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
So much trouble about one jump, just jump. From that height 2 meteres of waters is more then enough.
I have some crazu friend that jumped from bridge about 20 meters and water wasnt to deep either, altough he is insane
.
I have some crazu friend that jumped from bridge about 20 meters and water wasnt to deep either, altough he is insane
Characters:
90 lvl rogue xbow/dagger/cleric
72 lvl bower pacheon/fire/light
79 lvl spear hybrid


Missing TG with this character lol
90 lvl rogue xbow/dagger/cleric
72 lvl bower pacheon/fire/light
79 lvl spear hybrid


Missing TG with this character lol
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
Granps you know what I mean. I thought we were assuming he was going in feet first which is why we can disregard the position of his body as I thought it would be understood. How did I infer this? Well he want to know how deep he will go and he doesn't want to get hurt. A belly Flop won't go deep, head first and he might crack his skull. In Physics when doing experiments you're usually told to disregard air-resistance and wind for simplicity. Don't try to complicate things, remove unnecessary variables so you can get a round-about number.
Maddening


- Stress
- Ex-Staff
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:42 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
SM-Count wrote:1. Calculate gravitational potential energy at the top of 7.5 meters.
2. Calculate velocity based on height and gravitational accerlation.
3. Calculate kinetic energy at the base of the jump. Forget dissapation by air as it's much too short of a jump to matter.
Here we go. Name A the point of leaving the bridge; B the point of touching the water.
Energy in A = Energy in B (by the energy conservation law)
EcA + EpA = EcB + EpB (Ec = kinetic energy; Ep = potential energy)
Obviously, EcA = 0, because EcA = m * v ^ 2 / 2, and the velocity is 0 in that point.
Also, EpB = 0, because EpB = m * g * h, and the relative height, in this case, is 0.
We're left with:
EpA = EcB, hence m * g * h = m * v ^ 2 / 2, where h = height, v = velocity, m = mass, g = gravitational acceleration.
Conclusively v = sqrt(2 * g * h). Computed: v = 12,1243 m / s
EDIT: Kinetic energy upon touching the water:
EcB = m * v^2 / 2 = 68 * 147 / 2 = 34 * 147 = 4998 J.
I don't know how to calculate SM-Count's next steps, the first three is all I could do. I lack the theoretical base regarding friction and energy loss equations.
Last edited by Stress on Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.
- Stephanus
- Active Member
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:48 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Cabal online, Mars server
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
Well, looking at GD, i cant say anything but i had to show how is it there.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=103978
Also, trolls in action:)
viewtopic.php?f=72&t=83961&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
Enjoy.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=103978
Also, trolls in action:)
viewtopic.php?f=72&t=83961&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
Enjoy.
- hemagoku
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:42 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Artist Corner
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
i lack physics rules ,i really forgot physics after the exam 
check my dA : http://hemagoku.deviantart.com/ 
- Swindler
- Forum God
- Posts: 11256
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:49 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Pimpas Paradise.
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
just jump, if you break any legs well then you know you'll never do it again.. you learn about your mistakes
- Stephanus
- Active Member
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:48 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Cabal online, Mars server
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
I studied physics for like 8 year:)
All i can say is: experiments, experience, practice.
Thats all.
First from low heights and slowly go for higher jumps.
Practice and experience, not just
BOOOYAAAA!!!.... (ckrack) -> dead
All i can say is: experiments, experience, practice.
Thats all.
First from low heights and slowly go for higher jumps.
Practice and experience, not just
BOOOYAAAA!!!.... (ckrack) -> dead
Well, looking at GD, i cant say anything but i had to show how is it there.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=103978
Also, trolls in action:)
viewtopic.php?f=72&t=83961&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
Enjoy.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=103978
Also, trolls in action:)
viewtopic.php?f=72&t=83961&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
Enjoy.
- Grandpa
- Active Member
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:54 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
Easy enough. Don't jump or a piranha will bite your pee-pee off, but I thought I covered that.Barotix wrote: Don't try to complicate things, remove unnecessary variables.
- Stephanus
- Active Member
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:48 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Cabal online, Mars server
Re: Is there a super-hyper mathematic who could answer this.
Stephanus wrote:I studied physics for like 8 year:)
All i can say is: experiments, experience, practice.
Thats all.
First from low heights and slowly go for higher jumps.
Practice and experience, not just
BOOOYAAAA!!!.... (ckrack) -> dead
ps/edit:
if you do it, do it in style.
listen to this music before.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY-oili63QQ
helps a lot:D
arghnnooo wrong button T_T
Well, looking at GD, i cant say anything but i had to show how is it there.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=103978
Also, trolls in action:)
viewtopic.php?f=72&t=83961&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
Enjoy.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=103978
Also, trolls in action:)
viewtopic.php?f=72&t=83961&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
Enjoy.



