I've been to Six Flags and Kings Dominion within the last few weeks, and I'm still adamant that the back of rides are better. Everyone says the front, I say the back, and for the most part with a little convincing and a bit of switcharoo between the front and back of rides I've convinced my friends the same.
So for an example of why its better, let me explain:

Superman:
# Thrill Scale (0=Wimpy!, 10=Yikes!): 8.5Extreme height, acceleration, and speed
# Type: Steel out and back hypercoaster
# Highest point (feet): 200
# Max. speed (mph): 75
# Height restriction (minimum, in inches): 52
My theory, if your at the back, you'll be going down the 'hills' much faster, as the front of the train has already reached the bottom thus is pulling you and 'the back of the train' down and of course generating speed. While if your at the front, when you start inching down the hill the back of the train is still climbing to the top, and by the time you get to the bottom the back is only just coming over the ridge, thus you go slowly down the hill and thus is 'boring'.
You may just like the front cause you like to see where your going, in that case *meow*, but tell me what you think





















