ThisIsAvalon wrote:NuclearSilo wrote:What? Go after that easy? Cant even touch the skin of the bowman
Look @ 2:18 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JQqRkXXO5o
Oh, I didnt know that arrows combo have splash now. You can arrow combo BOTH my wizard and my tank at the same time?
BloodOwnzzz wrote:ThisIsAvalon wrote:NuclearSilo wrote:What? Go after that easy? Cant even touch the skin of the bowman
Look @ 2:18 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JQqRkXXO5o
Oh, I didnt know that arrows combo have splash now. You can arrow combo BOTH my wizard and my tank at the same time?
Yeh it's the new .pk2 edit they made at 0x33...
Da_Realest wrote:1. This bow user is in Armor not Garments like a typical bow user. Not to mention the Fences casted on my Armor Bow user. You're not hitting 40k even with a critical.Barotix wrote:Assuming KB hits, scorn is canceled: switch to Xbow use KB (move name escapes me) on archer, followed up by KD(assuming it hits 2x 50% each 100%): switch to dagger activate DD scud to archer and prick for 40k. Warlock/Cleric stuns cleric/bard, Cleric cast Bless spell.
Your move.
2. You can't kd or knockback an opponent that has a wall casted.
With that said, your Rogue won't kill me. So you may want to rethink that step.. If not, I can continue.
ThisIsAvalon wrote:NuclearSilo wrote:What? Go after that easy? Cant even touch the skin of the bowman
Look @ 2:18 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JQqRkXXO5o
Oh, I didnt know that arrows combo have splash now. You can arrow combo BOTH my wizard and my tank at the same time?
NuclearSilo wrote:ThisIsAvalon wrote:NuclearSilo wrote:What? Go after that easy? Cant even touch the skin of the bowman
Look @ 2:18 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JQqRkXXO5o
Oh, I didnt know that arrows combo have splash now. You can arrow combo BOTH my wizard and my tank at the same time?
What? I thought I killed 1 of your men at the beginning, so it is 8vs7. Easy to KB now, huh? Ah, u have a bard cant fight, so 8v6
BloodOwnzzz wrote:7 SoSun Bows...
Barotix wrote:BloodOwnzzz wrote:7 SoSun Bows...
getting desperate?
My Rogue/Warrior uses the AoE Scorn that gets the attention of your two Warriors, then switching to 1hd/Shield. While doing so, My 2 Bow users spam knockback combo on the Wizard who just attacked and my Warlock/Cleric cast Advance Reflect and stuns your Rogue.Barotix wrote:Da_Realest wrote:1. This bow user is in Armor not Garments like a typical bow user. Not to mention the Fences casted on my Armor Bow user. You're not hitting 40k even with a critical.Barotix wrote:Assuming KB hits, scorn is canceled: switch to Xbow use KB (move name escapes me) on archer, followed up by KD(assuming it hits 2x 50% each 100%): switch to dagger activate DD scud to archer and prick for 40k. Warlock/Cleric stuns cleric/bard, Cleric cast Bless spell.
Your move.
2. You can't kd or knockback an opponent that has a wall casted.
With that said, your Rogue won't kill me. So you may want to rethink that step.. If not, I can continue.
El-oh-El, no KD or KB because he doesn't have to get close: In his comfort zone with a Fence and Fire wall i shouldve read better.
so Scorn is canceled, hmm: Rogue is Kbed. Warlock/Cleric does a group stun on the warrior in armour the cleric/bard and the (A)Archer, Cleric cast bless. normal mage atke bow in Fire breaking shield followed up by KB x6 80% each.
@blood, not all warrior and cleric buffs are applicable outside a party.
Ziegfried wrote:What you do or say in any game is a small extension of who you really are. It's the anonymity that can allow them to show their true self, or who they would be if there was no "penalty" for their actions.
BloodOwnzzz wrote:Bless + Screens
NuclearSilo wrote:what skill that give 3k def?
Im trying to search in konpaku site
That was the point of scorn. To prevent your Warriors from taking any counterattack measures. You know, no casting screens, sprint assault, etc.Barotix wrote:NuclearSilo wrote:what skill that give 3k def?
Im trying to search in konpaku site
Nightbloom came here with a screenshot pimping with that 6k def, Jesus Christ freaking unstoppable. Although 1 AoE would've killed her because the gear was not touched by the pimp hand.
ATM reading everything up to now to see what i can do to Da_Realist.
Hmm since my warriors weren't atking scorn won't do anything, so i have one immobilized rogue for 5 seconds and my Wizard is being annoyed. Thinking of a counter must check konpaku.
Ziegfried wrote:What you do or say in any game is a small extension of who you really are. It's the anonymity that can allow them to show their true self, or who they would be if there was no "penalty" for their actions.
BloodOwnzzz wrote:I'm done with this fighting. I already got it down to this...
As long as you have 2 Warriors and 1 Cleric your party is pretty much invincible.(No more than 3 Wizards with it though...)
.Da_Realest wrote:8 Warlocks using stealth detect pots keeping Advance Reflect casted?BloodOwnzzz wrote:8 Wizards keep up perma Party Invisible and then when your party least expects it AoE's the shit out of you. Beat that shit!
Astra wrote:Da_Realest wrote:8 Warlocks using stealth detect pots keeping Advance Reflect casted?BloodOwnzzz wrote:8 Wizards keep up perma Party Invisible and then when your party least expects it AoE's the shit out of you. Beat that shit!
FTW dudee!
I still haven't seen 8men warlock pt.
Scary theory. I can imagine Vampire Kisses going on all sides, diseased people everywhere, someone call a doctor!
Agreed.tedtwilliger wrote:seriously, make a video of these fights or else you cant compare them.
These are too idealistic, what if the wariror goes to use a screen but hits the wrong key? what if he clicks the wrong target? what if the cleric goes to heal but hits offering instead?
dam theres so many variables in this game, you know the whole "human side" of the game and all. Theres no justice in arguing on paper because you aren't taking into account anything.
Not to forget lag
Ziegfried wrote:What you do or say in any game is a small extension of who you really are. It's the anonymity that can allow them to show their true self, or who they would be if there was no "penalty" for their actions.
