Reise wrote:Sometimes the quickest killing round is actually the least humane.
Regular 5.56 isn't the ideal hunting round because even though it'll shred whatever you shoot, you'd end up picking the pieces of fragmented metal out in order to save the meat. That's why people prefer slower moving, heavier rounds for hunting so they can hit a major organ like the heart and kill it cleanly that way. There are different loads for every caliber too.
AR's and handguns are more fun to shoot too, yes.

Sporterized rifles are tres lame.
Yep. I use a 150 grain core lokt soft points in my .270 when hunting with a rifle. I've never had a deer take a step after being shot with my .270. They are dead before they know what happened. EDIT: Meant to add, it also tears the meat up pretty bad. I've started shooting for their necks.. instant kill and doesn't ruin the meat of the front shoulders.
I agree hunting a deer or other animal with a handgun simply because it sounds fun isn't a good idea. An experienced ethical hunter could harvest game with a .22 pistol and not have the animal suffer, but the risks outweigh the "reward".. ie. the animal suffering just so you could "have some fun", if you don't make a perfect shot.
AR's are definitely fun to shoot. Mine isn't decked out with all the useless lights and shat. It's plain jane open sights. See above pic

EDIT: Here's why I don't shoot deer with my AR.. check out the size difference in the .223 round I shoot from my AR and the .270 round. The AR would get the job done fine, but I have more confidence in a quick kill with the .270. Not to mention the .270 will reach out a loooong way.

I like gun/hunting topics.. =//